BASET评分:一种用于筛选和分级阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的新型简单生物特征评分

IF 2.4 Q1 Medicine
Sleep Medicine: X Pub Date : 2023-12-15 Epub Date: 2023-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.sleepx.2023.100083
Abdelbaset M. Saleh , Magda A. Ahmed , Eman A. El Said , Nabil J. Awadalla , Amira A.M.M. Attia
{"title":"BASET评分:一种用于筛选和分级阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的新型简单生物特征评分","authors":"Abdelbaset M. Saleh ,&nbsp;Magda A. Ahmed ,&nbsp;Eman A. El Said ,&nbsp;Nabil J. Awadalla ,&nbsp;Amira A.M.M. Attia","doi":"10.1016/j.sleepx.2023.100083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Polysomnography (PSG) is the gold-standard diagnostic tool for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). However, the availability of PSG is limited, and OSA is widely underdiagnosed; more than 80% of most developed nations undiagnosed. There is no diagnostic validated simple tool with clear cutoff point for predicting and roll out patient with OSA in primary care clinics significantly alters clinical outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Our study aimed to assess the validity of BASET scoring as a new potential tool for screening and grading the severity of OSA patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>After institution review board approval and formal patient consent, 144 subjects for suspected OSA and their relatives were enrolled. All subjects were subjected to a full night PSG study after history taking, sleep questionnaires, and physical examination, including BASET score components: <strong>B</strong>= Body Mass Index (BMI), <strong>A</strong>= Abdominal circumference (AC), S = Snoring, <strong>E</strong>= Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and T= Tongue teeth imprint. ROC analysis that used to assess the optimal cutoff point of the BASET score and to compare its accuracy for predicting OSA with Berlin and STOP-Bang scores.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This study included 63 OSAS patients, 33 (52.38%) males and 30 (47.62%) females, and 81 controls; 22 (27.16%) males and 50 (72.84%) females. The Cronbach's alpha for the 5 BASET score components was 0.846, indicating the internal consistency reliability of the scale. Moreover, BASET score has a moderately strong positive significant correlation (r = 0.778, p&lt;0.001) with AHI. By ROC analysis, the accuracy of the three measures was generally high, with BASET score predicting OSA most accurately (AUC=0.984, 95%CI: 0.956–0.999), followed by STOP-Bang (AUC=0.939, 95%CI: (0.887–0.972) and Berlin (AUC=0.901, 95%CI: 0.841–0.945). The AUC of BASET score was significantly higher compared to the Berlin score (difference= 0.0825, 95%CI: 0.039–0.125) and STOP-Bang score (difference= 0.0447, 95%CI: 0.011–0.078). On the other hand, there was no difference between the AUC of Berlin and STOP-Bang scores (difference=0.0378, 95%CI: 0.006 - 0.081 4). BASET score was significantly (p&lt;0.001) associated with OSA grades,</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>BASET score is a convenient, reliable, and valid tool for diagnosing OSA. BASET score is more accurate for predicting OSA than Berlin and STOP-Bang scores, while there is no difference between Berlin and STOP-Bang scores. BASET score indicates OSA grades.</p></div><div><h3>Registration of clinical trials by number</h3><p>NCT05511974.</p></div><div><h3>Name of the registry</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov URL: <span>https://clinicaltrials.gov/</span><svg><path></path></svg></p></div>","PeriodicalId":37065,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Medicine: X","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100083"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/40/28/main.PMC10457551.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BASET scoring: A novel simple biometric score for screening and grading obstructive sleep apnea\",\"authors\":\"Abdelbaset M. Saleh ,&nbsp;Magda A. Ahmed ,&nbsp;Eman A. El Said ,&nbsp;Nabil J. Awadalla ,&nbsp;Amira A.M.M. Attia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sleepx.2023.100083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Polysomnography (PSG) is the gold-standard diagnostic tool for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). However, the availability of PSG is limited, and OSA is widely underdiagnosed; more than 80% of most developed nations undiagnosed. There is no diagnostic validated simple tool with clear cutoff point for predicting and roll out patient with OSA in primary care clinics significantly alters clinical outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Our study aimed to assess the validity of BASET scoring as a new potential tool for screening and grading the severity of OSA patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>After institution review board approval and formal patient consent, 144 subjects for suspected OSA and their relatives were enrolled. All subjects were subjected to a full night PSG study after history taking, sleep questionnaires, and physical examination, including BASET score components: <strong>B</strong>= Body Mass Index (BMI), <strong>A</strong>= Abdominal circumference (AC), S = Snoring, <strong>E</strong>= Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and T= Tongue teeth imprint. ROC analysis that used to assess the optimal cutoff point of the BASET score and to compare its accuracy for predicting OSA with Berlin and STOP-Bang scores.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This study included 63 OSAS patients, 33 (52.38%) males and 30 (47.62%) females, and 81 controls; 22 (27.16%) males and 50 (72.84%) females. The Cronbach's alpha for the 5 BASET score components was 0.846, indicating the internal consistency reliability of the scale. Moreover, BASET score has a moderately strong positive significant correlation (r = 0.778, p&lt;0.001) with AHI. By ROC analysis, the accuracy of the three measures was generally high, with BASET score predicting OSA most accurately (AUC=0.984, 95%CI: 0.956–0.999), followed by STOP-Bang (AUC=0.939, 95%CI: (0.887–0.972) and Berlin (AUC=0.901, 95%CI: 0.841–0.945). The AUC of BASET score was significantly higher compared to the Berlin score (difference= 0.0825, 95%CI: 0.039–0.125) and STOP-Bang score (difference= 0.0447, 95%CI: 0.011–0.078). On the other hand, there was no difference between the AUC of Berlin and STOP-Bang scores (difference=0.0378, 95%CI: 0.006 - 0.081 4). BASET score was significantly (p&lt;0.001) associated with OSA grades,</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>BASET score is a convenient, reliable, and valid tool for diagnosing OSA. BASET score is more accurate for predicting OSA than Berlin and STOP-Bang scores, while there is no difference between Berlin and STOP-Bang scores. BASET score indicates OSA grades.</p></div><div><h3>Registration of clinical trials by number</h3><p>NCT05511974.</p></div><div><h3>Name of the registry</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov URL: <span>https://clinicaltrials.gov/</span><svg><path></path></svg></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep Medicine: X\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100083\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/40/28/main.PMC10457551.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep Medicine: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259014272300023X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Medicine: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259014272300023X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景多导睡眠图(PSG)是阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的金标准诊断工具。然而,PSG的可用性有限,OSA的诊断普遍不足;大多数发达国家80%以上未确诊。在初级保健诊所中,没有一种诊断验证的简单工具可以预测和推广OSA患者,从而显著改变临床结果。目的我们的研究旨在评估BASET评分作为筛查和分级OSA患者严重程度的一种新的潜在工具的有效性。方法在机构审查委员会批准和患者正式同意后,纳入144名疑似OSA受试者及其亲属。所有受试者在进行病史记录、睡眠问卷调查和体检后,均接受了一项通宵PSG研究,包括BASET评分组成部分:B=体重指数(BMI)、a=腹围(AC)、S=打鼾、E=埃沃斯睡眠量表和T=舌牙印记。ROC分析,用于评估BASET评分的最佳截止点,并将其预测OSA的准确性与Berlin和STOP-Bang评分进行比较。结果本研究包括63例OSAS患者,其中男性33例(52.38%),女性30例(47.62%),对照组81例;男性22例(27.16%),女性50例(72.84%)。5个BASET分数组成部分的Cronbachα为0.846,表明量表的内部一致性可靠性。此外,BASET评分与AHI具有中等强度的正显著相关性(r=0.778,p<0.001)。通过ROC分析,这三项指标的准确性普遍较高,BASET评分预测OSA最准确(AUC=0.984,95%CI:0.956-0.999),其次是STOP-Bang(AUC=0.939,95%CI:(0.887–0.972)和Berlin(AUC=0.0901,95%CI:0.841–0.945)。BASET评分的AUC显著高于Berlin评分(差异=0.0825,95%CI:0.039–0.125)和STOP-Ban评分(差异0.0447,95%CI:0.011–0.078)。另一方面,Berlin的AUC和STOP-Bang评分之间没有差异(差异=0.0378、95%CI:0.06-0.081 4)。BASET评分与OSA分级显著相关(p<0.001)。结论BASET评分是诊断OSA的一种方便、可靠、有效的工具。BASET分数在预测OSA方面比Berlin和STOP-Bang分数更准确,而Berlin和STOP-Bang分数之间没有差异。BASET分数表示OSA等级。临床试验注册编号NCT05511974。注册名称ClinicalTrials.gov网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov/
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

BASET scoring: A novel simple biometric score for screening and grading obstructive sleep apnea

BASET scoring: A novel simple biometric score for screening and grading obstructive sleep apnea

BASET scoring: A novel simple biometric score for screening and grading obstructive sleep apnea

BASET scoring: A novel simple biometric score for screening and grading obstructive sleep apnea

Background

Polysomnography (PSG) is the gold-standard diagnostic tool for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). However, the availability of PSG is limited, and OSA is widely underdiagnosed; more than 80% of most developed nations undiagnosed. There is no diagnostic validated simple tool with clear cutoff point for predicting and roll out patient with OSA in primary care clinics significantly alters clinical outcomes.

Objectives

Our study aimed to assess the validity of BASET scoring as a new potential tool for screening and grading the severity of OSA patients.

Methods

After institution review board approval and formal patient consent, 144 subjects for suspected OSA and their relatives were enrolled. All subjects were subjected to a full night PSG study after history taking, sleep questionnaires, and physical examination, including BASET score components: B= Body Mass Index (BMI), A= Abdominal circumference (AC), S = Snoring, E= Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and T= Tongue teeth imprint. ROC analysis that used to assess the optimal cutoff point of the BASET score and to compare its accuracy for predicting OSA with Berlin and STOP-Bang scores.

Results

This study included 63 OSAS patients, 33 (52.38%) males and 30 (47.62%) females, and 81 controls; 22 (27.16%) males and 50 (72.84%) females. The Cronbach's alpha for the 5 BASET score components was 0.846, indicating the internal consistency reliability of the scale. Moreover, BASET score has a moderately strong positive significant correlation (r = 0.778, p<0.001) with AHI. By ROC analysis, the accuracy of the three measures was generally high, with BASET score predicting OSA most accurately (AUC=0.984, 95%CI: 0.956–0.999), followed by STOP-Bang (AUC=0.939, 95%CI: (0.887–0.972) and Berlin (AUC=0.901, 95%CI: 0.841–0.945). The AUC of BASET score was significantly higher compared to the Berlin score (difference= 0.0825, 95%CI: 0.039–0.125) and STOP-Bang score (difference= 0.0447, 95%CI: 0.011–0.078). On the other hand, there was no difference between the AUC of Berlin and STOP-Bang scores (difference=0.0378, 95%CI: 0.006 - 0.081 4). BASET score was significantly (p<0.001) associated with OSA grades,

Conclusion

BASET score is a convenient, reliable, and valid tool for diagnosing OSA. BASET score is more accurate for predicting OSA than Berlin and STOP-Bang scores, while there is no difference between Berlin and STOP-Bang scores. BASET score indicates OSA grades.

Registration of clinical trials by number

NCT05511974.

Name of the registry

ClinicalTrials.gov URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep Medicine: X
Sleep Medicine: X Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书