评估HEmopatch®减少腋窝淋巴结清扫后血清相关并发症:一项初步研究(HEIDI)。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Breast Care Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-04 DOI:10.1159/000525839
Merel A Spiekerman van Weezelenburg, Lisa de Rooij, Loeki Aldenhoven, Pieter P H L Broos, Sander M J van Kuijk, Elisabeth R M van Haaren, Alfred Janssen, Yvonne L J Vissers, Geerard L Beets, James van Bastelaar
{"title":"评估HEmopatch®减少腋窝淋巴结清扫后血清相关并发症:一项初步研究(HEIDI)。","authors":"Merel A Spiekerman van Weezelenburg, Lisa de Rooij, Loeki Aldenhoven, Pieter P H L Broos, Sander M J van Kuijk, Elisabeth R M van Haaren, Alfred Janssen, Yvonne L J Vissers, Geerard L Beets, James van Bastelaar","doi":"10.1159/000525839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is performed to treat locoregional metastatic disease in breast cancer and melanoma patients. However, it is notorious for its complications, most commonly seroma formation and its sequelae. Ample research has been done to evaluate seroma formation after ALND; these results, however, have not been conclusive. Hence, this pilot study aimed to evaluate a readily available haemostatic patch, Hemopatch®, to assess its effect on seroma formation following ALND.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this pilot study, a prospective cohort of 20 patients receiving Hemopatch® following ALND was compared to a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent ALND between 2014 and 2019. The primary outcome measure was the number of patients developing clinically significant seroma (CSS) after ALND. Additionally, the number of wound complications, subsequent interventions, additional outpatient clinic visits, and drain output was assessed. Differences between groups were deemed clinically relevant if the proportions differed >50% between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 20 prospective and 42 retrospective patients were included. In the Hemopatch® group, 30% of the patients developed CSS, compared to 43% in the control group. Three patients in both groups developed a surgical site infection. Thirty-five percent of patients in the Hemopatch® group required additional unscheduled visits versus 62% of patients in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of Hemopatch® after ALND did not lead to a clinically relevant reduction of CSS and wound complications. However, fewer Hemopatch® patients required additional outpatient clinic visits. Due to the limited amount of participants, the true value of Hemopatch® in ALND remains unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":9310,"journal":{"name":"Breast Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9801401/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating HEmopatch® in Reducing Seroma-Related Complications following Axillary Lymph Node DIssection: A Pilot Study (HEIDI).\",\"authors\":\"Merel A Spiekerman van Weezelenburg, Lisa de Rooij, Loeki Aldenhoven, Pieter P H L Broos, Sander M J van Kuijk, Elisabeth R M van Haaren, Alfred Janssen, Yvonne L J Vissers, Geerard L Beets, James van Bastelaar\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000525839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is performed to treat locoregional metastatic disease in breast cancer and melanoma patients. However, it is notorious for its complications, most commonly seroma formation and its sequelae. Ample research has been done to evaluate seroma formation after ALND; these results, however, have not been conclusive. Hence, this pilot study aimed to evaluate a readily available haemostatic patch, Hemopatch®, to assess its effect on seroma formation following ALND.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this pilot study, a prospective cohort of 20 patients receiving Hemopatch® following ALND was compared to a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent ALND between 2014 and 2019. The primary outcome measure was the number of patients developing clinically significant seroma (CSS) after ALND. Additionally, the number of wound complications, subsequent interventions, additional outpatient clinic visits, and drain output was assessed. Differences between groups were deemed clinically relevant if the proportions differed >50% between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 20 prospective and 42 retrospective patients were included. In the Hemopatch® group, 30% of the patients developed CSS, compared to 43% in the control group. Three patients in both groups developed a surgical site infection. Thirty-five percent of patients in the Hemopatch® group required additional unscheduled visits versus 62% of patients in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of Hemopatch® after ALND did not lead to a clinically relevant reduction of CSS and wound complications. However, fewer Hemopatch® patients required additional outpatient clinic visits. Due to the limited amount of participants, the true value of Hemopatch® in ALND remains unclear.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9801401/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000525839\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000525839","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)用于治疗乳腺癌和黑色素瘤患者的局部转移性疾病。然而,它的并发症是臭名昭著的,最常见的是血清肿的形成及其后遗症。在评估ALND后血清形成方面已经做了大量的研究;然而,这些结果并不是决定性的。因此,本初步研究旨在评估一种现成的止血贴片Hemopatch®,以评估其对ALND后血肿形成的影响。方法:在这项初步研究中,将20名接受血斑贴片®治疗的ALND患者的前瞻性队列与2014年至2019年期间接受ALND的患者的回顾性队列进行比较。主要结局指标是ALND后发生临床显著血清肿(CSS)的患者数量。此外,还评估了伤口并发症的数量、随后的干预措施、额外的门诊就诊次数和引流量。如果组间比例差异大于50%,则认为组间差异具有临床相关性。结果:共纳入20例前瞻性和42例回顾性患者。在Hemopatch®组中,30%的患者发生了CSS,而对照组为43%。两组均有3例患者发生手术部位感染。Hemopatch®组中35%的患者需要额外的计划外就诊,而对照组中这一比例为62%。结论:ALND术后应用Hemopatch®并没有导致临床相关的CSS和伤口并发症的减少。然而,较少的Hemopatch®患者需要额外的门诊就诊。由于参与者数量有限,Hemopatch®在ALND中的真正价值尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating HEmopatch® in Reducing Seroma-Related Complications following Axillary Lymph Node DIssection: A Pilot Study (HEIDI).

Purpose: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is performed to treat locoregional metastatic disease in breast cancer and melanoma patients. However, it is notorious for its complications, most commonly seroma formation and its sequelae. Ample research has been done to evaluate seroma formation after ALND; these results, however, have not been conclusive. Hence, this pilot study aimed to evaluate a readily available haemostatic patch, Hemopatch®, to assess its effect on seroma formation following ALND.

Methods: In this pilot study, a prospective cohort of 20 patients receiving Hemopatch® following ALND was compared to a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent ALND between 2014 and 2019. The primary outcome measure was the number of patients developing clinically significant seroma (CSS) after ALND. Additionally, the number of wound complications, subsequent interventions, additional outpatient clinic visits, and drain output was assessed. Differences between groups were deemed clinically relevant if the proportions differed >50% between groups.

Results: In total, 20 prospective and 42 retrospective patients were included. In the Hemopatch® group, 30% of the patients developed CSS, compared to 43% in the control group. Three patients in both groups developed a surgical site infection. Thirty-five percent of patients in the Hemopatch® group required additional unscheduled visits versus 62% of patients in the control group.

Conclusion: The application of Hemopatch® after ALND did not lead to a clinically relevant reduction of CSS and wound complications. However, fewer Hemopatch® patients required additional outpatient clinic visits. Due to the limited amount of participants, the true value of Hemopatch® in ALND remains unclear.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breast Care
Breast Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Breast Care'' is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that covers all aspects of breast biology. Due to its interdisciplinary perspective, it encompasses articles on basic research, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of malignant diseases of the breast. In addition to presenting current developments in clinical research, the scope of clinical practice is broadened by including articles on relevant legal, financial and economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信