{"title":"非洲或亚洲,lˈschistosomes人类进化的起源是什么?","authors":"Guangjun Zhang , Olivier Verneau , Chiping Qiu , Joseph Jourdane , Mingyi Xia","doi":"10.1016/S0764-4469(01)01383-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The origin and the evolution of Schistosomatidae species, due to their medical importance (responsible of the second most important human parasitosis after malaria), arouse a great interest. A combination of phylogenetic studies using several molecular markers has provided support for the traditional grouping and evolutionary inferences derived from morphological and biological data. The genus <em>Schistosoma</em>, which comprises all species parasitizing Man, is generally split into four evolutionary lineages (<em>mansoni, haematobium, indicum</em> and <em>japonicum</em> lineages). The group of African schistosomes (including <em>mansoni</em> and <em>haematobium</em> lineages) appears very divergent from the <em>japonicum</em> lineage. Recent phylogenetic studies using partial 28S rDNA sequencing and including <em>Orientobilharzia turkestanicum</em> from Iran, an Asian parasite of livestock, found, unexpectedly, that this species nested among <em>Schistosoma</em> species, thus rendering the latter paraphyletic, and suggested an Asian origin for the <em>Schistosoma</em> genus. The present work re-examines the question of the geographical origin of human schistosomes by analysing a new genomic marker (ITS2) as well as by including the use of <em>O. turkestanicum</em> originating from northeastern China. Our results are in agreement with previous work using 28S, in demonstrating that <em>Schistosoma</em> is not monophyletic. However, <em>O. turkestanicum</em>, whatever the method of analysis used (distance or parsimony), was grouped with members of the <em>japonicum</em> group to the exclusion of African <em>Schistosoma</em> species. Then, our data argue strongly for the need for further phylogenetic study including new taxa and new genomic sequences before definitly concluding either an Asian or African origin for the genus <em>Schistosoma</em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100306,"journal":{"name":"Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie","volume":"324 11","pages":"Pages 1001-1010"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0764-4469(01)01383-X","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Afrique ou Asie, quelle est lˈorigine évolutive des schistosomes humains ?\",\"authors\":\"Guangjun Zhang , Olivier Verneau , Chiping Qiu , Joseph Jourdane , Mingyi Xia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0764-4469(01)01383-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The origin and the evolution of Schistosomatidae species, due to their medical importance (responsible of the second most important human parasitosis after malaria), arouse a great interest. A combination of phylogenetic studies using several molecular markers has provided support for the traditional grouping and evolutionary inferences derived from morphological and biological data. The genus <em>Schistosoma</em>, which comprises all species parasitizing Man, is generally split into four evolutionary lineages (<em>mansoni, haematobium, indicum</em> and <em>japonicum</em> lineages). The group of African schistosomes (including <em>mansoni</em> and <em>haematobium</em> lineages) appears very divergent from the <em>japonicum</em> lineage. Recent phylogenetic studies using partial 28S rDNA sequencing and including <em>Orientobilharzia turkestanicum</em> from Iran, an Asian parasite of livestock, found, unexpectedly, that this species nested among <em>Schistosoma</em> species, thus rendering the latter paraphyletic, and suggested an Asian origin for the <em>Schistosoma</em> genus. The present work re-examines the question of the geographical origin of human schistosomes by analysing a new genomic marker (ITS2) as well as by including the use of <em>O. turkestanicum</em> originating from northeastern China. Our results are in agreement with previous work using 28S, in demonstrating that <em>Schistosoma</em> is not monophyletic. However, <em>O. turkestanicum</em>, whatever the method of analysis used (distance or parsimony), was grouped with members of the <em>japonicum</em> group to the exclusion of African <em>Schistosoma</em> species. Then, our data argue strongly for the need for further phylogenetic study including new taxa and new genomic sequences before definitly concluding either an Asian or African origin for the genus <em>Schistosoma</em>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie\",\"volume\":\"324 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1001-1010\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0764-4469(01)01383-X\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S076444690101383X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S076444690101383X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Afrique ou Asie, quelle est lˈorigine évolutive des schistosomes humains ?
The origin and the evolution of Schistosomatidae species, due to their medical importance (responsible of the second most important human parasitosis after malaria), arouse a great interest. A combination of phylogenetic studies using several molecular markers has provided support for the traditional grouping and evolutionary inferences derived from morphological and biological data. The genus Schistosoma, which comprises all species parasitizing Man, is generally split into four evolutionary lineages (mansoni, haematobium, indicum and japonicum lineages). The group of African schistosomes (including mansoni and haematobium lineages) appears very divergent from the japonicum lineage. Recent phylogenetic studies using partial 28S rDNA sequencing and including Orientobilharzia turkestanicum from Iran, an Asian parasite of livestock, found, unexpectedly, that this species nested among Schistosoma species, thus rendering the latter paraphyletic, and suggested an Asian origin for the Schistosoma genus. The present work re-examines the question of the geographical origin of human schistosomes by analysing a new genomic marker (ITS2) as well as by including the use of O. turkestanicum originating from northeastern China. Our results are in agreement with previous work using 28S, in demonstrating that Schistosoma is not monophyletic. However, O. turkestanicum, whatever the method of analysis used (distance or parsimony), was grouped with members of the japonicum group to the exclusion of African Schistosoma species. Then, our data argue strongly for the need for further phylogenetic study including new taxa and new genomic sequences before definitly concluding either an Asian or African origin for the genus Schistosoma.