非导弹穿透性脑损伤--清除长穿透性异物的外科技术:病例报告。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
British Journal of Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-30 DOI:10.1080/02688697.2022.2159926
Ming-Fai Tse, Shih-Hao Huang, Yi-Hsin Tsai, Chien-Hsun Li
{"title":"非导弹穿透性脑损伤--清除长穿透性异物的外科技术:病例报告。","authors":"Ming-Fai Tse, Shih-Hao Huang, Yi-Hsin Tsai, Chien-Hsun Li","doi":"10.1080/02688697.2022.2159926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Penetrating brain injury (PBI), a relatively uncommon injury, is associated with remarkable secondary complications such as vascular injury, intracranial haemorrhage, infection, and mortality. Non-missile PBI (NMPBI) due to sharp or blunt objects is usually treated surgically by removing the penetrating object, evacuating the associated haemorrhage, identifying possible bleeders along with haemostasis, and performing debridement. Various approaches are used for different scenarios of non-missile PBI according to the object's characteristics, penetrating site, depth, associated intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), and presence of vascular injury along the penetrating tract. NMPBI cases are rarely reported among civilians. We herein describe a patient who was successfully treated for NMPBI, as well as frontal ICH, by simultaneously removing the heavy, metallic penetrating foreign body.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed corticotomy through a shorter tract instead of a deep penetrating trajectory, which minimizes the extent of damage to the brain and enables immediate management of vascular injury under direct vision while removing the foreign body, and intraoperative sonography, which provides real-time information of the penetrating object and the surrounding brain structure. We did not perform computed tomography angiography and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) because the stab location was at the frontal region, with low risk of vascular injury. Moreover, DSA is time-consuming, which may delay decompressive surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patient was successfully treated through an alternative approach removing the long, heavy, metallic penetrating foreign body and eliminating the accompanying frontal ICH simultaneously. Focal brain abscess developed 8 days after the injury and resolved completely after antibiotics treatment. Dysphasia gradually improved but right distal limbs weakness with spasticity is still present.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest prompt diagnosis by preoperative imaging, screening of vascular injury, decompression with debridement, and antibiotics treatment are important. The alternative surgical approach we proposed is exceptional and should be considered while treating patients with deep NMPBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9261,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"266-269"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-missile penetrating brain injury-surgical techniques for removing a long penetrating foreign body: a case report.\",\"authors\":\"Ming-Fai Tse, Shih-Hao Huang, Yi-Hsin Tsai, Chien-Hsun Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02688697.2022.2159926\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Penetrating brain injury (PBI), a relatively uncommon injury, is associated with remarkable secondary complications such as vascular injury, intracranial haemorrhage, infection, and mortality. Non-missile PBI (NMPBI) due to sharp or blunt objects is usually treated surgically by removing the penetrating object, evacuating the associated haemorrhage, identifying possible bleeders along with haemostasis, and performing debridement. Various approaches are used for different scenarios of non-missile PBI according to the object's characteristics, penetrating site, depth, associated intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), and presence of vascular injury along the penetrating tract. NMPBI cases are rarely reported among civilians. We herein describe a patient who was successfully treated for NMPBI, as well as frontal ICH, by simultaneously removing the heavy, metallic penetrating foreign body.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed corticotomy through a shorter tract instead of a deep penetrating trajectory, which minimizes the extent of damage to the brain and enables immediate management of vascular injury under direct vision while removing the foreign body, and intraoperative sonography, which provides real-time information of the penetrating object and the surrounding brain structure. We did not perform computed tomography angiography and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) because the stab location was at the frontal region, with low risk of vascular injury. Moreover, DSA is time-consuming, which may delay decompressive surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patient was successfully treated through an alternative approach removing the long, heavy, metallic penetrating foreign body and eliminating the accompanying frontal ICH simultaneously. Focal brain abscess developed 8 days after the injury and resolved completely after antibiotics treatment. Dysphasia gradually improved but right distal limbs weakness with spasticity is still present.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest prompt diagnosis by preoperative imaging, screening of vascular injury, decompression with debridement, and antibiotics treatment are important. The alternative surgical approach we proposed is exceptional and should be considered while treating patients with deep NMPBI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"266-269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2022.2159926\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/12/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2022.2159926","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:穿透性脑损伤(PBI)是一种相对少见的损伤,与血管损伤、颅内出血、感染和死亡等显著的继发性并发症相关。由锐器或钝器造成的非导弹穿透性脑损伤(NMPBI)通常采用手术治疗,方法是取出穿透物、排出相关出血、确定可能的出血点并止血,以及进行清创。根据物体的特征、穿透部位、深度、相关的脑内出血(ICH)以及穿透道沿线是否存在血管损伤,对不同情况的非弹道导弹穿透性脑损伤采用不同的方法。平民中很少有 NMPBI 病例的报道。我们在此描述了一名通过同时取出重型金属穿透性异物成功治疗 NMPBI 和额叶 ICH 的患者:方法:我们通过较短的路径而不是深部穿透路径进行了皮质切开术,这样可以最大限度地减少对大脑的损伤程度,并能在直视下立即处理血管损伤,同时取出异物,术中超声检查可提供穿透物和周围大脑结构的实时信息。我们没有进行计算机断层扫描血管造影和数字减影血管造影(DSA),因为刺伤位置在额部,血管损伤风险较低。此外,数字减影血管造影耗时较长,可能会延误减压手术:结果:患者通过另一种方法成功接受了治疗,取出了又长又重的金属穿透性异物,同时消除了伴随的额部 ICH。伤后 8 天出现局灶性脑脓肿,经抗生素治疗后完全消退。失语症逐渐好转,但右侧远端肢体无力伴痉挛仍然存在:我们的研究结果表明,术前影像学检查、血管损伤筛查、清创减压和抗生素治疗非常重要。我们提出的另一种手术方法很特别,在治疗深部 NMPBI 患者时应加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-missile penetrating brain injury-surgical techniques for removing a long penetrating foreign body: a case report.

Purpose: Penetrating brain injury (PBI), a relatively uncommon injury, is associated with remarkable secondary complications such as vascular injury, intracranial haemorrhage, infection, and mortality. Non-missile PBI (NMPBI) due to sharp or blunt objects is usually treated surgically by removing the penetrating object, evacuating the associated haemorrhage, identifying possible bleeders along with haemostasis, and performing debridement. Various approaches are used for different scenarios of non-missile PBI according to the object's characteristics, penetrating site, depth, associated intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), and presence of vascular injury along the penetrating tract. NMPBI cases are rarely reported among civilians. We herein describe a patient who was successfully treated for NMPBI, as well as frontal ICH, by simultaneously removing the heavy, metallic penetrating foreign body.

Methods: We performed corticotomy through a shorter tract instead of a deep penetrating trajectory, which minimizes the extent of damage to the brain and enables immediate management of vascular injury under direct vision while removing the foreign body, and intraoperative sonography, which provides real-time information of the penetrating object and the surrounding brain structure. We did not perform computed tomography angiography and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) because the stab location was at the frontal region, with low risk of vascular injury. Moreover, DSA is time-consuming, which may delay decompressive surgery.

Results: The patient was successfully treated through an alternative approach removing the long, heavy, metallic penetrating foreign body and eliminating the accompanying frontal ICH simultaneously. Focal brain abscess developed 8 days after the injury and resolved completely after antibiotics treatment. Dysphasia gradually improved but right distal limbs weakness with spasticity is still present.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest prompt diagnosis by preoperative imaging, screening of vascular injury, decompression with debridement, and antibiotics treatment are important. The alternative surgical approach we proposed is exceptional and should be considered while treating patients with deep NMPBI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Neurosurgery
British Journal of Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Neurosurgery is a leading international forum for debate in the field of neurosurgery, publishing original peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality, along with comment and correspondence on all topics of current interest to neurosurgeons worldwide. Coverage includes all aspects of case assessment and surgical practice, as well as wide-ranging research, with an emphasis on clinical rather than experimental material. Special emphasis is placed on postgraduate education with review articles on basic neurosciences and on the theory behind advances in techniques, investigation and clinical management. All papers are submitted to rigorous and independent peer-review, ensuring the journal’s wide citation and its appearance in the major abstracting and indexing services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信