通过技术设备对亲子依恋的生态瞬时评估:系统的方法回顾

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Marie Bischoff , Silke Schmidt , Holger Muehlan , Sabina Ulbricht , Matthias Heckmann , Neeltje van den Berg , Hans J. Grabe , Samuel Tomczyk
{"title":"通过技术设备对亲子依恋的生态瞬时评估:系统的方法回顾","authors":"Marie Bischoff ,&nbsp;Silke Schmidt ,&nbsp;Holger Muehlan ,&nbsp;Sabina Ulbricht ,&nbsp;Matthias Heckmann ,&nbsp;Neeltje van den Berg ,&nbsp;Hans J. Grabe ,&nbsp;Samuel Tomczyk","doi":"10.1016/j.infbeh.2023.101882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Despite extensive research about parent-child attachment using observational and self-report studies, complementary measures are needed to assess this construct objectively with ecological validity, as well as less obtrusiveness and reactivity than traditional measures. This systematic review describes existing technology-based ecologically momentary assessment (EMA) tools examining attachment-related emotions, cognition, and </span>behaviors between the child and its parents. From the study’s inception until March 2021, four databases were searched resulting in 11,910 screened citations. Finally, 18 records were included, characterized by a broad variety of assessment tools, sample characteristics, study designs, and attachment outcomes. Technology-based EMA methods comprised audio, video, diary, and sensory assessment modalities, each occuying its methodological niche. When reported, the </span>psychometric properties of the EMA methods were evaluated as very good; however, the included studies’ </span>psychometric data was not completely examined. The main attachment outcomes assessed by EMA were emotional and cognitive reactions and actions of the children, the parents, and the dyad. Cognition was rarely assessed using EMA methods. Future research should focus on the complexity of attachment considering different ethnic backgrounds, multiple caregivers' viewpoints, gender aspects, as well as cognitive and dyadic contents in the naturalistic environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48222,"journal":{"name":"Infant Behavior & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological momentary assessment of parent-child attachment via technological devices: A systematic methodological review\",\"authors\":\"Marie Bischoff ,&nbsp;Silke Schmidt ,&nbsp;Holger Muehlan ,&nbsp;Sabina Ulbricht ,&nbsp;Matthias Heckmann ,&nbsp;Neeltje van den Berg ,&nbsp;Hans J. Grabe ,&nbsp;Samuel Tomczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infbeh.2023.101882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span><span>Despite extensive research about parent-child attachment using observational and self-report studies, complementary measures are needed to assess this construct objectively with ecological validity, as well as less obtrusiveness and reactivity than traditional measures. This systematic review describes existing technology-based ecologically momentary assessment (EMA) tools examining attachment-related emotions, cognition, and </span>behaviors between the child and its parents. From the study’s inception until March 2021, four databases were searched resulting in 11,910 screened citations. Finally, 18 records were included, characterized by a broad variety of assessment tools, sample characteristics, study designs, and attachment outcomes. Technology-based EMA methods comprised audio, video, diary, and sensory assessment modalities, each occuying its methodological niche. When reported, the </span>psychometric properties of the EMA methods were evaluated as very good; however, the included studies’ </span>psychometric data was not completely examined. The main attachment outcomes assessed by EMA were emotional and cognitive reactions and actions of the children, the parents, and the dyad. Cognition was rarely assessed using EMA methods. Future research should focus on the complexity of attachment considering different ethnic backgrounds, multiple caregivers' viewpoints, gender aspects, as well as cognitive and dyadic contents in the naturalistic environment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infant Behavior & Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infant Behavior & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638323000747\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant Behavior & Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638323000747","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管使用观察和自我报告研究对亲子依恋进行了广泛的研究,但需要补充措施来客观地评估这一结构,并具有生态有效性,并且比传统措施更少突兀性和反应性。本系统综述描述了现有的基于技术的生态瞬间评估(EMA)工具,用于检查儿童与其父母之间的依恋相关情绪、认知和行为。从研究开始到2021年3月,对四个数据库进行了检索,结果筛选了11910条引文。最后,纳入了18条记录,包括各种评估工具、样本特征、研究设计和依恋结果。基于技术的EMA方法包括音频,视频,日记和感官评估模式,每种方法都占据其方法论利基。当报告时,EMA方法的心理测量特性被评价为非常好;然而,纳入研究的心理测量数据并没有被完全检查。EMA评估的主要依恋结果是儿童、父母和夫妻的情感和认知反应和行为。很少使用EMA方法评估认知。未来的研究应关注依恋的复杂性,考虑不同种族背景、多重照顾者视角、性别因素以及自然环境下的认知和二元内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecological momentary assessment of parent-child attachment via technological devices: A systematic methodological review

Despite extensive research about parent-child attachment using observational and self-report studies, complementary measures are needed to assess this construct objectively with ecological validity, as well as less obtrusiveness and reactivity than traditional measures. This systematic review describes existing technology-based ecologically momentary assessment (EMA) tools examining attachment-related emotions, cognition, and behaviors between the child and its parents. From the study’s inception until March 2021, four databases were searched resulting in 11,910 screened citations. Finally, 18 records were included, characterized by a broad variety of assessment tools, sample characteristics, study designs, and attachment outcomes. Technology-based EMA methods comprised audio, video, diary, and sensory assessment modalities, each occuying its methodological niche. When reported, the psychometric properties of the EMA methods were evaluated as very good; however, the included studies’ psychometric data was not completely examined. The main attachment outcomes assessed by EMA were emotional and cognitive reactions and actions of the children, the parents, and the dyad. Cognition was rarely assessed using EMA methods. Future research should focus on the complexity of attachment considering different ethnic backgrounds, multiple caregivers' viewpoints, gender aspects, as well as cognitive and dyadic contents in the naturalistic environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infant Behavior & Development
Infant Behavior & Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Infant Behavior & Development publishes empirical (fundamental and clinical), theoretical, methodological and review papers. Brief reports dealing with behavioral development during infancy (up to 3 years) will also be considered. Papers of an inter- and multidisciplinary nature, for example neuroscience, non-linear dynamics and modelling approaches, are particularly encouraged. Areas covered by the journal include cognitive development, emotional development, perception, perception-action coupling, motor development and socialisation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信