{"title":"骶神经调节对泌尿指征的实施。丹麦在三级转诊医院新服务最初15个月的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Hanne Kobberø, Margrethe Andersen, Karin Andersen, Torben Brøchner Pedersen, Mads Hvid Poulsen","doi":"10.1080/21681805.2022.2120066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a well-established treatment modality for idiopathic overactive bladder and urgency incontinence, idiopathic fecal incontinence and non-obstructive urinary retention. This study describes the start-up phase of establishing the SNM service. <i>Primary objective:</i> To investigate the patient-reported outcome measures of SNM on lower urinary tract dysfunction symptoms. <i>Secondary objectives</i>: To investigate bowel function, sexual satisfaction and to monitor SNM safety.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-two patients with refractory idiopathic and neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction were offered a two-stage test-phase procedure and SNM device implantation. On completing the study, the patients rated their satisfaction with the treatment using a five-point Likert scale and a bother score of urinary, bowel and sexual symptoms on a scale of 1-10 (the worst). Their complications were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen patients (86%) were responders during the test phase and had the pulse generator implanted. Seventeen patients were very satisfied/satisfied. A statistically significant change in urinary symptoms bother score was observed in the idiopathic and neurogenic patients, a reduction from 10 to 4 (<i>p</i> = .0057) and 10 to 3 (<i>p</i> = .014), respectively. Eleven patients (58%) had symptoms from two or three pelvic compartments. Nine patients (47%) had complications. All but one event was resolved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SNM is safe in this heterogeneous group of patients with refractory lower urinary tract dysfunction of various etiologies. A substantial improvement was observed in the pelvic organ dysfunction, demanding a multidisciplinary approach. More studies are required to standardize the evaluation of the subjective and objective outcomes of SNM.</p>","PeriodicalId":21542,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","volume":"56 5-6","pages":"404-411"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of sacral neuromodulation for urinary indications. A Danish prospective study during the initial 15 months of a new service in a tertiary referral hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Hanne Kobberø, Margrethe Andersen, Karin Andersen, Torben Brøchner Pedersen, Mads Hvid Poulsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21681805.2022.2120066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a well-established treatment modality for idiopathic overactive bladder and urgency incontinence, idiopathic fecal incontinence and non-obstructive urinary retention. This study describes the start-up phase of establishing the SNM service. <i>Primary objective:</i> To investigate the patient-reported outcome measures of SNM on lower urinary tract dysfunction symptoms. <i>Secondary objectives</i>: To investigate bowel function, sexual satisfaction and to monitor SNM safety.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-two patients with refractory idiopathic and neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction were offered a two-stage test-phase procedure and SNM device implantation. On completing the study, the patients rated their satisfaction with the treatment using a five-point Likert scale and a bother score of urinary, bowel and sexual symptoms on a scale of 1-10 (the worst). Their complications were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen patients (86%) were responders during the test phase and had the pulse generator implanted. Seventeen patients were very satisfied/satisfied. A statistically significant change in urinary symptoms bother score was observed in the idiopathic and neurogenic patients, a reduction from 10 to 4 (<i>p</i> = .0057) and 10 to 3 (<i>p</i> = .014), respectively. Eleven patients (58%) had symptoms from two or three pelvic compartments. Nine patients (47%) had complications. All but one event was resolved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SNM is safe in this heterogeneous group of patients with refractory lower urinary tract dysfunction of various etiologies. A substantial improvement was observed in the pelvic organ dysfunction, demanding a multidisciplinary approach. More studies are required to standardize the evaluation of the subjective and objective outcomes of SNM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"56 5-6\",\"pages\":\"404-411\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2022.2120066\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2022.2120066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementation of sacral neuromodulation for urinary indications. A Danish prospective study during the initial 15 months of a new service in a tertiary referral hospital.
Objective: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a well-established treatment modality for idiopathic overactive bladder and urgency incontinence, idiopathic fecal incontinence and non-obstructive urinary retention. This study describes the start-up phase of establishing the SNM service. Primary objective: To investigate the patient-reported outcome measures of SNM on lower urinary tract dysfunction symptoms. Secondary objectives: To investigate bowel function, sexual satisfaction and to monitor SNM safety.
Materials and methods: Twenty-two patients with refractory idiopathic and neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction were offered a two-stage test-phase procedure and SNM device implantation. On completing the study, the patients rated their satisfaction with the treatment using a five-point Likert scale and a bother score of urinary, bowel and sexual symptoms on a scale of 1-10 (the worst). Their complications were assessed.
Results: Nineteen patients (86%) were responders during the test phase and had the pulse generator implanted. Seventeen patients were very satisfied/satisfied. A statistically significant change in urinary symptoms bother score was observed in the idiopathic and neurogenic patients, a reduction from 10 to 4 (p = .0057) and 10 to 3 (p = .014), respectively. Eleven patients (58%) had symptoms from two or three pelvic compartments. Nine patients (47%) had complications. All but one event was resolved.
Conclusions: SNM is safe in this heterogeneous group of patients with refractory lower urinary tract dysfunction of various etiologies. A substantial improvement was observed in the pelvic organ dysfunction, demanding a multidisciplinary approach. More studies are required to standardize the evaluation of the subjective and objective outcomes of SNM.
期刊介绍:
Scandinavian Journal of Urology is a journal for the clinical urologist and publishes papers within all fields in clinical urology. Experimental papers related to clinical questions are also invited.Important reports with great news value are published promptly.