大容量器官采购组织在循环性死亡后捐赠增加时代的结果。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Mark J Hobeika, Terri Menser, Kevin Myer, Adriana Lopez, Asad F Shaikh, Lauren Quinn, Chris Curran, R Patrick Wood, R Mark Ghobrial, A Osama Gaber
{"title":"大容量器官采购组织在循环性死亡后捐赠增加时代的结果。","authors":"Mark J Hobeika,&nbsp;Terri Menser,&nbsp;Kevin Myer,&nbsp;Adriana Lopez,&nbsp;Asad F Shaikh,&nbsp;Lauren Quinn,&nbsp;Chris Curran,&nbsp;R Patrick Wood,&nbsp;R Mark Ghobrial,&nbsp;A Osama Gaber","doi":"10.1177/15269248221122879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Donation after circulatory death (DCD) is rapidly increasing in the United States. Detailed data outlining the process from referral to organ transplantation is lacking. <b>Project Aims:</b> We sought to quantify differences at each stage along the referral to donation pathway by donor type. Additionally, we examined factors associated with successful DCD organ utilization. <b>Design:</b> This program evaluation analyzed data from a single organ procurement organization in 2018 to assess demographic and clinical predictors of progression through the donation process, including the role of first-person authorization in DCD. Descriptive statistics were examined by donation stage for demographic characteristics using chi-square; univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to model predictors of utilization and authorization by organ type, respectively. <b>Results:</b> There were 2466 organ donation referrals during 2018, including 575 donations after brainstem death (DBD), 1890 controlled DCD referrals, and 1 uncontrolled DCD referral. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models highlighted differences in authorization rates by donor type (DCD vs DBD) and by age, race, and ethnicity. Next-of-kin authorization was declined in 23% of first-person authorized potential DCD, highlighting issues related to the role of donor registration in DCD. Pre-mortem heparin administration was predictive of DCD organ utilization; donor age and warm ischemia time of less than 30 min was statistically significantly associated with DCD extra-renal organ utilization. <b>Conclusion:</b> These results provided insight into strategies for increasing authorization and transplantation of organs from DCD donors and identified areas of improvement for process standardization and policy development.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":"32 4","pages":"314-320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of a High-Volume Organ Procurement Organization in the Era of Increasing Donation After Circulatory Death.\",\"authors\":\"Mark J Hobeika,&nbsp;Terri Menser,&nbsp;Kevin Myer,&nbsp;Adriana Lopez,&nbsp;Asad F Shaikh,&nbsp;Lauren Quinn,&nbsp;Chris Curran,&nbsp;R Patrick Wood,&nbsp;R Mark Ghobrial,&nbsp;A Osama Gaber\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15269248221122879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Donation after circulatory death (DCD) is rapidly increasing in the United States. Detailed data outlining the process from referral to organ transplantation is lacking. <b>Project Aims:</b> We sought to quantify differences at each stage along the referral to donation pathway by donor type. Additionally, we examined factors associated with successful DCD organ utilization. <b>Design:</b> This program evaluation analyzed data from a single organ procurement organization in 2018 to assess demographic and clinical predictors of progression through the donation process, including the role of first-person authorization in DCD. Descriptive statistics were examined by donation stage for demographic characteristics using chi-square; univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to model predictors of utilization and authorization by organ type, respectively. <b>Results:</b> There were 2466 organ donation referrals during 2018, including 575 donations after brainstem death (DBD), 1890 controlled DCD referrals, and 1 uncontrolled DCD referral. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models highlighted differences in authorization rates by donor type (DCD vs DBD) and by age, race, and ethnicity. Next-of-kin authorization was declined in 23% of first-person authorized potential DCD, highlighting issues related to the role of donor registration in DCD. Pre-mortem heparin administration was predictive of DCD organ utilization; donor age and warm ischemia time of less than 30 min was statistically significantly associated with DCD extra-renal organ utilization. <b>Conclusion:</b> These results provided insight into strategies for increasing authorization and transplantation of organs from DCD donors and identified areas of improvement for process standardization and policy development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"314-320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248221122879\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248221122879","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

导读:在美国,循环死亡后的捐赠(DCD)正在迅速增加。目前缺乏从转诊到器官移植的详细资料。项目目标:我们试图按捐赠者类型量化转诊到捐赠途径的每个阶段的差异。此外,我们检查了与成功的DCD器官利用相关的因素。设计:本项目评估分析了2018年单个器官采购组织的数据,以评估捐赠过程中进展的人口统计学和临床预测因素,包括第一人称授权在DCD中的作用。描述性统计采用卡方法按捐赠阶段检验人口学特征;采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分别对器官类型的使用和授权的预测因子进行建模。结果:2018年全年器官捐献转诊2466例,其中脑干死亡(DBD)后捐献575例,控制DCD转诊1890例,非控制DCD转诊1例。单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型强调了供体类型(DCD vs DBD)、年龄、种族和民族授权率的差异。在第一人称授权的潜在DCD中,23%的近亲授权被拒绝,突出了与捐赠者登记在DCD中的作用相关的问题。死前给药肝素可预测DCD器官利用;供体年龄和热缺血时间小于30 min与DCD肾外器官利用有统计学意义。结论:这些结果为增加DCD供体器官授权和移植的策略提供了见解,并确定了流程标准化和政策制定的改进领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of a High-Volume Organ Procurement Organization in the Era of Increasing Donation After Circulatory Death.

Introduction: Donation after circulatory death (DCD) is rapidly increasing in the United States. Detailed data outlining the process from referral to organ transplantation is lacking. Project Aims: We sought to quantify differences at each stage along the referral to donation pathway by donor type. Additionally, we examined factors associated with successful DCD organ utilization. Design: This program evaluation analyzed data from a single organ procurement organization in 2018 to assess demographic and clinical predictors of progression through the donation process, including the role of first-person authorization in DCD. Descriptive statistics were examined by donation stage for demographic characteristics using chi-square; univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to model predictors of utilization and authorization by organ type, respectively. Results: There were 2466 organ donation referrals during 2018, including 575 donations after brainstem death (DBD), 1890 controlled DCD referrals, and 1 uncontrolled DCD referral. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models highlighted differences in authorization rates by donor type (DCD vs DBD) and by age, race, and ethnicity. Next-of-kin authorization was declined in 23% of first-person authorized potential DCD, highlighting issues related to the role of donor registration in DCD. Pre-mortem heparin administration was predictive of DCD organ utilization; donor age and warm ischemia time of less than 30 min was statistically significantly associated with DCD extra-renal organ utilization. Conclusion: These results provided insight into strategies for increasing authorization and transplantation of organs from DCD donors and identified areas of improvement for process standardization and policy development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Transplantation
Progress in Transplantation SURGERY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Transplantation (PIT) is the official journal of NATCO, The Organization for Transplant Professionals. Journal Partners include: Australasian Transplant Coordinators Association and Society for Transplant Social Workers. PIT reflects the multi-disciplinary team approach to procurement and clinical aspects of organ and tissue transplantation by providing a professional forum for exchange of the continually changing body of knowledge in transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信