一项关于中低收入国家早产儿窒息症咖啡因使用障碍和促进因素的调查。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-18 DOI:10.1080/20469047.2023.2235938
Amy Sarah Ginsburg, Jesse Coleman, Mary Waiyego, Florence Murila, William M Macharia, Roseline Ochieng
{"title":"一项关于中低收入国家早产儿窒息症咖啡因使用障碍和促进因素的调查。","authors":"Amy Sarah Ginsburg, Jesse Coleman, Mary Waiyego, Florence Murila, William M Macharia, Roseline Ochieng","doi":"10.1080/20469047.2023.2235938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite its associated benefits which include better long-term pulmonary and neurodevelopmental outcome, the use of caffeine for apnoea of prematurity (AoP) has been limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To better understand current caffeine use, the barriers and facilitators to its use and perceptions and practices in LMIC which have a disproportionately high burden of prematurity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online global survey was conducted, targeting healthcare providers working and training in paediatrics and/or neonatology in LMIC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 181 respondents in 16 LMIC were included in the analysis; most were physicians working in publicly-funded urban tertiary hospitals. Most had received training in the use of caffeine for AoP (77%), reported expertise (70%) and confidence (96%) in its use, and had access to caffeine (65%). Caffeine availability was reported to be the greatest barrier (48%) and the greatest facilitator (37%). Other common barriers included cost (31%), access (7%) and policies or guidelines on caffeine use (7%); other common facilitators included policies or guidelines on caffeine use (11%), access (10%), staff/other providers' acceptance of caffeine as an appropriate treatment (9%) and the availability of staff to administer caffeine (8%). Most (79%) noted that access to caffeine was important, 92% agreed that caffeine improves quality of care, and 95% agreed that caffeine improves patient outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Improving availability and access to low-cost caffeine will be key to increasing caffeine use in LMIC.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>AoP: Apnoea of Prematurity; LMIC: low- and middle-Income countries; REDCap: Research Electronic Data Capture.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of barriers and facilitators to caffeine use for apnoea of prematurity in low- and middle-income countries.\",\"authors\":\"Amy Sarah Ginsburg, Jesse Coleman, Mary Waiyego, Florence Murila, William M Macharia, Roseline Ochieng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20469047.2023.2235938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite its associated benefits which include better long-term pulmonary and neurodevelopmental outcome, the use of caffeine for apnoea of prematurity (AoP) has been limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To better understand current caffeine use, the barriers and facilitators to its use and perceptions and practices in LMIC which have a disproportionately high burden of prematurity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online global survey was conducted, targeting healthcare providers working and training in paediatrics and/or neonatology in LMIC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 181 respondents in 16 LMIC were included in the analysis; most were physicians working in publicly-funded urban tertiary hospitals. Most had received training in the use of caffeine for AoP (77%), reported expertise (70%) and confidence (96%) in its use, and had access to caffeine (65%). Caffeine availability was reported to be the greatest barrier (48%) and the greatest facilitator (37%). Other common barriers included cost (31%), access (7%) and policies or guidelines on caffeine use (7%); other common facilitators included policies or guidelines on caffeine use (11%), access (10%), staff/other providers' acceptance of caffeine as an appropriate treatment (9%) and the availability of staff to administer caffeine (8%). Most (79%) noted that access to caffeine was important, 92% agreed that caffeine improves quality of care, and 95% agreed that caffeine improves patient outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Improving availability and access to low-cost caffeine will be key to increasing caffeine use in LMIC.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>AoP: Apnoea of Prematurity; LMIC: low- and middle-Income countries; REDCap: Research Electronic Data Capture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20469047.2023.2235938\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20469047.2023.2235938","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管咖啡因的相关益处包括更好的长期肺部和神经发育结果,但在中低收入国家(LMIC),咖啡因治疗早产儿呼吸暂停(AoP)的使用受到限制。目的:为了更好地了解目前咖啡因的使用情况,在LMIC中使用它的障碍和促进因素,以及对早产负担过高的看法和做法。方法:以在LMIC从事儿科和/或新生儿科工作和培训的医疗保健提供者为对象,进行了一项匿名的在线全球调查。结果:共有16个LMIC的181名受访者被纳入分析;大多数是在公立城市三级医院工作的医生。大多数人接受过咖啡因用于AoP的培训(77%),报告了其使用的专业知识(70%)和信心(96%),并获得了咖啡因(65%)。据报道,咖啡因的可用性是最大的障碍(48%)和最大的促进因素(37%)。其他常见的障碍包括成本(31%)、获取(7%)和咖啡因使用政策或指南(7%);其他常见的促进者包括关于咖啡因使用(11%)、获取(10%)、工作人员/其他提供者接受咖啡因作为适当治疗的政策或指南(9%)以及工作人员管理咖啡因的可用性(8%)。大多数人(79%)认为摄入咖啡因很重要,92%的人认为咖啡因可以提高护理质量,95%的人认为咖啡可以改善患者的预后。结论:改善低成本咖啡因的供应和获取将是增加LMIC中咖啡因使用的关键;LMIC:中低收入国家;REDCap:研究电子数据捕获。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A survey of barriers and facilitators to caffeine use for apnoea of prematurity in low- and middle-income countries.

Background: Despite its associated benefits which include better long-term pulmonary and neurodevelopmental outcome, the use of caffeine for apnoea of prematurity (AoP) has been limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).

Aim: To better understand current caffeine use, the barriers and facilitators to its use and perceptions and practices in LMIC which have a disproportionately high burden of prematurity.

Methods: An anonymous online global survey was conducted, targeting healthcare providers working and training in paediatrics and/or neonatology in LMIC.

Results: A total of 181 respondents in 16 LMIC were included in the analysis; most were physicians working in publicly-funded urban tertiary hospitals. Most had received training in the use of caffeine for AoP (77%), reported expertise (70%) and confidence (96%) in its use, and had access to caffeine (65%). Caffeine availability was reported to be the greatest barrier (48%) and the greatest facilitator (37%). Other common barriers included cost (31%), access (7%) and policies or guidelines on caffeine use (7%); other common facilitators included policies or guidelines on caffeine use (11%), access (10%), staff/other providers' acceptance of caffeine as an appropriate treatment (9%) and the availability of staff to administer caffeine (8%). Most (79%) noted that access to caffeine was important, 92% agreed that caffeine improves quality of care, and 95% agreed that caffeine improves patient outcome.

Conclusion: Improving availability and access to low-cost caffeine will be key to increasing caffeine use in LMIC.

Abbreviations: AoP: Apnoea of Prematurity; LMIC: low- and middle-Income countries; REDCap: Research Electronic Data Capture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信