Amy Sarah Ginsburg, Jesse Coleman, Mary Waiyego, Florence Murila, William M Macharia, Roseline Ochieng
{"title":"一项关于中低收入国家早产儿窒息症咖啡因使用障碍和促进因素的调查。","authors":"Amy Sarah Ginsburg, Jesse Coleman, Mary Waiyego, Florence Murila, William M Macharia, Roseline Ochieng","doi":"10.1080/20469047.2023.2235938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite its associated benefits which include better long-term pulmonary and neurodevelopmental outcome, the use of caffeine for apnoea of prematurity (AoP) has been limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To better understand current caffeine use, the barriers and facilitators to its use and perceptions and practices in LMIC which have a disproportionately high burden of prematurity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online global survey was conducted, targeting healthcare providers working and training in paediatrics and/or neonatology in LMIC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 181 respondents in 16 LMIC were included in the analysis; most were physicians working in publicly-funded urban tertiary hospitals. Most had received training in the use of caffeine for AoP (77%), reported expertise (70%) and confidence (96%) in its use, and had access to caffeine (65%). Caffeine availability was reported to be the greatest barrier (48%) and the greatest facilitator (37%). Other common barriers included cost (31%), access (7%) and policies or guidelines on caffeine use (7%); other common facilitators included policies or guidelines on caffeine use (11%), access (10%), staff/other providers' acceptance of caffeine as an appropriate treatment (9%) and the availability of staff to administer caffeine (8%). Most (79%) noted that access to caffeine was important, 92% agreed that caffeine improves quality of care, and 95% agreed that caffeine improves patient outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Improving availability and access to low-cost caffeine will be key to increasing caffeine use in LMIC.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>AoP: Apnoea of Prematurity; LMIC: low- and middle-Income countries; REDCap: Research Electronic Data Capture.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of barriers and facilitators to caffeine use for apnoea of prematurity in low- and middle-income countries.\",\"authors\":\"Amy Sarah Ginsburg, Jesse Coleman, Mary Waiyego, Florence Murila, William M Macharia, Roseline Ochieng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20469047.2023.2235938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite its associated benefits which include better long-term pulmonary and neurodevelopmental outcome, the use of caffeine for apnoea of prematurity (AoP) has been limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To better understand current caffeine use, the barriers and facilitators to its use and perceptions and practices in LMIC which have a disproportionately high burden of prematurity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online global survey was conducted, targeting healthcare providers working and training in paediatrics and/or neonatology in LMIC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 181 respondents in 16 LMIC were included in the analysis; most were physicians working in publicly-funded urban tertiary hospitals. Most had received training in the use of caffeine for AoP (77%), reported expertise (70%) and confidence (96%) in its use, and had access to caffeine (65%). Caffeine availability was reported to be the greatest barrier (48%) and the greatest facilitator (37%). Other common barriers included cost (31%), access (7%) and policies or guidelines on caffeine use (7%); other common facilitators included policies or guidelines on caffeine use (11%), access (10%), staff/other providers' acceptance of caffeine as an appropriate treatment (9%) and the availability of staff to administer caffeine (8%). Most (79%) noted that access to caffeine was important, 92% agreed that caffeine improves quality of care, and 95% agreed that caffeine improves patient outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Improving availability and access to low-cost caffeine will be key to increasing caffeine use in LMIC.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>AoP: Apnoea of Prematurity; LMIC: low- and middle-Income countries; REDCap: Research Electronic Data Capture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20469047.2023.2235938\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20469047.2023.2235938","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A survey of barriers and facilitators to caffeine use for apnoea of prematurity in low- and middle-income countries.
Background: Despite its associated benefits which include better long-term pulmonary and neurodevelopmental outcome, the use of caffeine for apnoea of prematurity (AoP) has been limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).
Aim: To better understand current caffeine use, the barriers and facilitators to its use and perceptions and practices in LMIC which have a disproportionately high burden of prematurity.
Methods: An anonymous online global survey was conducted, targeting healthcare providers working and training in paediatrics and/or neonatology in LMIC.
Results: A total of 181 respondents in 16 LMIC were included in the analysis; most were physicians working in publicly-funded urban tertiary hospitals. Most had received training in the use of caffeine for AoP (77%), reported expertise (70%) and confidence (96%) in its use, and had access to caffeine (65%). Caffeine availability was reported to be the greatest barrier (48%) and the greatest facilitator (37%). Other common barriers included cost (31%), access (7%) and policies or guidelines on caffeine use (7%); other common facilitators included policies or guidelines on caffeine use (11%), access (10%), staff/other providers' acceptance of caffeine as an appropriate treatment (9%) and the availability of staff to administer caffeine (8%). Most (79%) noted that access to caffeine was important, 92% agreed that caffeine improves quality of care, and 95% agreed that caffeine improves patient outcome.
Conclusion: Improving availability and access to low-cost caffeine will be key to increasing caffeine use in LMIC.
Abbreviations: AoP: Apnoea of Prematurity; LMIC: low- and middle-Income countries; REDCap: Research Electronic Data Capture.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.