尼克主动脉根部扩大技术后的结果:单中心经验。

Q3 Medicine
AORTA Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1757800
Amr Ashry, Sashini Iddawela, Vaibhav Mishra, William Wang, Heba M Mohammed, Amer Harky, Mohammed M Mostafa
{"title":"尼克主动脉根部扩大技术后的结果:单中心经验。","authors":"Amr Ashry,&nbsp;Sashini Iddawela,&nbsp;Vaibhav Mishra,&nbsp;William Wang,&nbsp;Heba M Mohammed,&nbsp;Amer Harky,&nbsp;Mohammed M Mostafa","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1757800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Different techniques for aortic root enlargement (ARE) have been reported in the literature. Each technique comes with its own advantages and disadvantages. We report our outcomes of Nick's technique for ARE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A single-center retrospective data analysis of 31 patients was performed. Patients were operated between May 2015 and November 2017 at Assuit University Heart Hospital, Assuit, Egypt.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 125 minutes (range: 90.0-160.0 minutes), with 90 minutes of cross-clamp (range: 60.0-110.0 minutes). Altogether 59% of the patients had mixed aortic valve diseases. Median intensive care unit and total hospital stay were 2 and 5 days, respectively. Patient-prosthesis mismatch was reported in one patient only (3.25%). Two patients died within 30 days. Median pressure gradient across the aortic valve was 20 mm Hg at 3 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The benefits of Nick's technique for ARE can be demonstrated in populations with younger patients and complicated pathology. Further research is required in larger patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":52392,"journal":{"name":"AORTA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9767773/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes Post-Nick's Aortic Root Enlargement Technique: Single-Center Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Amr Ashry,&nbsp;Sashini Iddawela,&nbsp;Vaibhav Mishra,&nbsp;William Wang,&nbsp;Heba M Mohammed,&nbsp;Amer Harky,&nbsp;Mohammed M Mostafa\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1757800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Different techniques for aortic root enlargement (ARE) have been reported in the literature. Each technique comes with its own advantages and disadvantages. We report our outcomes of Nick's technique for ARE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A single-center retrospective data analysis of 31 patients was performed. Patients were operated between May 2015 and November 2017 at Assuit University Heart Hospital, Assuit, Egypt.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 125 minutes (range: 90.0-160.0 minutes), with 90 minutes of cross-clamp (range: 60.0-110.0 minutes). Altogether 59% of the patients had mixed aortic valve diseases. Median intensive care unit and total hospital stay were 2 and 5 days, respectively. Patient-prosthesis mismatch was reported in one patient only (3.25%). Two patients died within 30 days. Median pressure gradient across the aortic valve was 20 mm Hg at 3 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The benefits of Nick's technique for ARE can be demonstrated in populations with younger patients and complicated pathology. Further research is required in larger patient populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AORTA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9767773/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AORTA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757800\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AORTA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:文献中报道了不同的主动脉根部扩大(ARE)技术。每种技术都有自己的优点和缺点。我们报告尼克的ARE技术的结果。方法:对31例患者进行单中心回顾性资料分析。患者于2015年5月至2017年11月在埃及阿苏特的阿苏特大学心脏医院接受手术。结果:中位体外循环时间125分钟(范围:90.0 ~ 160.0分钟),交叉夹持时间90分钟(范围:60.0 ~ 110.0分钟)。总共59%的患者有混合性主动脉瓣病变。重症监护病房和总住院时间的中位数分别为2天和5天。患者-假体不匹配仅报告1例(3.25%)。两名患者在30天内死亡。随访3年时,主动脉瓣的中位压力梯度为20毫米汞柱。结论:Nick的技术对ARE的益处可以在年轻患者和复杂病理人群中得到证明。需要在更大的患者群体中进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Outcomes Post-Nick's Aortic Root Enlargement Technique: Single-Center Experience.

Outcomes Post-Nick's Aortic Root Enlargement Technique: Single-Center Experience.

Background:  Different techniques for aortic root enlargement (ARE) have been reported in the literature. Each technique comes with its own advantages and disadvantages. We report our outcomes of Nick's technique for ARE.

Methods:  A single-center retrospective data analysis of 31 patients was performed. Patients were operated between May 2015 and November 2017 at Assuit University Heart Hospital, Assuit, Egypt.

Results:  The median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 125 minutes (range: 90.0-160.0 minutes), with 90 minutes of cross-clamp (range: 60.0-110.0 minutes). Altogether 59% of the patients had mixed aortic valve diseases. Median intensive care unit and total hospital stay were 2 and 5 days, respectively. Patient-prosthesis mismatch was reported in one patient only (3.25%). Two patients died within 30 days. Median pressure gradient across the aortic valve was 20 mm Hg at 3 years of follow-up.

Conclusion:  The benefits of Nick's technique for ARE can be demonstrated in populations with younger patients and complicated pathology. Further research is required in larger patient populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AORTA
AORTA Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
119
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信