在最初的创伤成像中,通过计算机断层血管造影检测到最小的主动脉损伤:创伤中心单一学术一级经验。

Q3 Medicine
AORTA Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1757793
Leila Rezai Gharai, Christopher Ovanez, William C Goodman, Xiaoyan Deng, Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, Michel B Aboutanos, Mark S Parker
{"title":"在最初的创伤成像中,通过计算机断层血管造影检测到最小的主动脉损伤:创伤中心单一学术一级经验。","authors":"Leila Rezai Gharai,&nbsp;Christopher Ovanez,&nbsp;William C Goodman,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Deng,&nbsp;Dipankar Bandyopadhyay,&nbsp;Michel B Aboutanos,&nbsp;Mark S Parker","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1757793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Minimal aortic injury (MAI), a subtype of acute traumatic aortic injury, is being increasingly recognized with better imaging techniques. Given conservative management, the role of follow-up imaging albeit important yet has to be defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> All trauma chest computed tomography angiographies (CTAs) at our center between January 2012 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed for presence of MAI. MAIs were generally reimaged at 24 to 72 hours and then at a 7- and 30-day interval. Follow-up CTAs were reviewed for stability, progression, or resolution of MAI, along with assessment of injury severity scores (ISS) and concomitant injuries, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 17,569 chest CTAs were performed over this period. Incidence of MAI on the initial chest CTA was 113 (0.65%), with 105 patients receiving follow-up CTAs. The first, second, third, and fourth follow-up CTAs were performed at a median of 2, 10, 28, and 261 days, respectively. Forty five (42.9%), 22 (21%), 5 (4.8%), and 1 (1%) of the MAIs were resolved by first, second, third, and fourth follow-up CTAs. Altogether, 21 patients showed stability (mean ISS of 16.6), and 11 demonstrated improvement (mean ISS 25.8) of MAIs. Eight patients had no follow-up CTA (mean ISS 21). No progression to higher-grade injury was observed. Advancing age decreased the odds of MAI resolution on follow-up. A possible trend (<i>p</i>-value 0.22) between increasing ISS and time to resolution of MAIs was noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> In our series of acute traumatic MAIs diagnosed on CTA imaging, there was no progression of injuries with conservative management, questioning the necessity of sequential follow-up imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":52392,"journal":{"name":"AORTA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9767788/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimal Aortic Injury Detected on Computed Tomography Angiography during Initial Trauma Imaging: Single Academic Level 1 Trauma Center Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Leila Rezai Gharai,&nbsp;Christopher Ovanez,&nbsp;William C Goodman,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Deng,&nbsp;Dipankar Bandyopadhyay,&nbsp;Michel B Aboutanos,&nbsp;Mark S Parker\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1757793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Minimal aortic injury (MAI), a subtype of acute traumatic aortic injury, is being increasingly recognized with better imaging techniques. Given conservative management, the role of follow-up imaging albeit important yet has to be defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> All trauma chest computed tomography angiographies (CTAs) at our center between January 2012 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed for presence of MAI. MAIs were generally reimaged at 24 to 72 hours and then at a 7- and 30-day interval. Follow-up CTAs were reviewed for stability, progression, or resolution of MAI, along with assessment of injury severity scores (ISS) and concomitant injuries, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 17,569 chest CTAs were performed over this period. Incidence of MAI on the initial chest CTA was 113 (0.65%), with 105 patients receiving follow-up CTAs. The first, second, third, and fourth follow-up CTAs were performed at a median of 2, 10, 28, and 261 days, respectively. Forty five (42.9%), 22 (21%), 5 (4.8%), and 1 (1%) of the MAIs were resolved by first, second, third, and fourth follow-up CTAs. Altogether, 21 patients showed stability (mean ISS of 16.6), and 11 demonstrated improvement (mean ISS 25.8) of MAIs. Eight patients had no follow-up CTA (mean ISS 21). No progression to higher-grade injury was observed. Advancing age decreased the odds of MAI resolution on follow-up. A possible trend (<i>p</i>-value 0.22) between increasing ISS and time to resolution of MAIs was noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> In our series of acute traumatic MAIs diagnosed on CTA imaging, there was no progression of injuries with conservative management, questioning the necessity of sequential follow-up imaging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AORTA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9767788/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AORTA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757793\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AORTA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:微创主动脉损伤(MAI)是急性外伤性主动脉损伤的一种亚型,随着影像学技术的进步,越来越被人们所认识。在保守治疗的情况下,随访影像学的作用虽然很重要,但仍需明确。方法:回顾性分析本中心2012年1月至2019年1月期间所有创伤胸部ct血管造影(cta),以确定MAI的存在。MAIs通常在24 - 72小时重新成像,然后每隔7天和30天重新成像。随访cta分别评估MAI的稳定性、进展或消退,以及损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和伴随损伤的评估。结果:在此期间共进行了17,569例胸部cta。首次胸部CTA中MAI的发生率为113例(0.65%),其中105例患者接受了后续CTA。第一、第二、第三和第四次随访cta的中位时间分别为2、10、28和261天。45例(42.9%)、22例(21%)、5例(4.8%)和1例(1%)的MAIs通过第一、第二、第三和第四次随访cta得到解决。共有21例患者的MAIs表现出稳定性(平均ISS为16.6),11例患者的MAIs表现出改善(平均ISS为25.8)。8例患者没有随访CTA(平均ISS 21)。未观察到更高级别损伤的进展。随着年龄的增长,随访时MAI解决的几率降低。注意到ISS增加与MAIs解决时间之间可能存在趋势(p值0.22)。结论:在我们的一系列CTA诊断的急性外伤性MAIs中,保守治疗无损伤进展,质疑序贯随访影像学的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Minimal Aortic Injury Detected on Computed Tomography Angiography during Initial Trauma Imaging: Single Academic Level 1 Trauma Center Experience.

Minimal Aortic Injury Detected on Computed Tomography Angiography during Initial Trauma Imaging: Single Academic Level 1 Trauma Center Experience.

Minimal Aortic Injury Detected on Computed Tomography Angiography during Initial Trauma Imaging: Single Academic Level 1 Trauma Center Experience.

Minimal Aortic Injury Detected on Computed Tomography Angiography during Initial Trauma Imaging: Single Academic Level 1 Trauma Center Experience.

Background:  Minimal aortic injury (MAI), a subtype of acute traumatic aortic injury, is being increasingly recognized with better imaging techniques. Given conservative management, the role of follow-up imaging albeit important yet has to be defined.

Methods:  All trauma chest computed tomography angiographies (CTAs) at our center between January 2012 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed for presence of MAI. MAIs were generally reimaged at 24 to 72 hours and then at a 7- and 30-day interval. Follow-up CTAs were reviewed for stability, progression, or resolution of MAI, along with assessment of injury severity scores (ISS) and concomitant injuries, respectively.

Results:  A total of 17,569 chest CTAs were performed over this period. Incidence of MAI on the initial chest CTA was 113 (0.65%), with 105 patients receiving follow-up CTAs. The first, second, third, and fourth follow-up CTAs were performed at a median of 2, 10, 28, and 261 days, respectively. Forty five (42.9%), 22 (21%), 5 (4.8%), and 1 (1%) of the MAIs were resolved by first, second, third, and fourth follow-up CTAs. Altogether, 21 patients showed stability (mean ISS of 16.6), and 11 demonstrated improvement (mean ISS 25.8) of MAIs. Eight patients had no follow-up CTA (mean ISS 21). No progression to higher-grade injury was observed. Advancing age decreased the odds of MAI resolution on follow-up. A possible trend (p-value 0.22) between increasing ISS and time to resolution of MAIs was noted.

Conclusion:  In our series of acute traumatic MAIs diagnosed on CTA imaging, there was no progression of injuries with conservative management, questioning the necessity of sequential follow-up imaging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AORTA
AORTA Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
119
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信