童年人格与成年意识形态直接相关的证据不一致,而且非常薄弱。

IF 5 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology
Neil Fasching, Kevin Arceneaux, Bert N. Bakker
{"title":"童年人格与成年意识形态直接相关的证据不一致,而且非常薄弱。","authors":"Neil Fasching,&nbsp;Kevin Arceneaux,&nbsp;Bert N. Bakker","doi":"10.1111/jopy.12874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>We add depth and breadth to the study of the childhood personality–adult ideology link with additional data, measures, and measurement approaches.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Past research in (political) psychology has put forward that individual differences in psychological needs shape ideology. Most evidence supporting this claim is cross-sectional. Two previous longitudinal studies showed preliminary evidence that childhood personality traits linked to negativity bias correlate with political ideology in adulthood, yet these studies have limitations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We report the results from two longitudinal studies (combined <i>N</i> = 13,822) conducted in the United Kingdom that measure childhood personality (5–11 years old) and political ideology from puberty (age 16) to early (age 26) and middle adulthood (age 42).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We find very weak and inconsistent evidence that childhood personality traits related to negativity bias are directly associated with general conservatism, social conservatism, or economic conservatism across different stages of adulthood. Across the board, Bayes Factors most often indicate strong evidence for the null hypothesis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We offer evidence that the results of previous research are not as robust or as consistent as scholars in the extant literature presume. Our findings call for more, not less, research on the link between childhood personality and political ideology.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jopy.12874","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inconsistent and very weak evidence for a direct association between childhood personality and adult ideology\",\"authors\":\"Neil Fasching,&nbsp;Kevin Arceneaux,&nbsp;Bert N. Bakker\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jopy.12874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>We add depth and breadth to the study of the childhood personality–adult ideology link with additional data, measures, and measurement approaches.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Past research in (political) psychology has put forward that individual differences in psychological needs shape ideology. Most evidence supporting this claim is cross-sectional. Two previous longitudinal studies showed preliminary evidence that childhood personality traits linked to negativity bias correlate with political ideology in adulthood, yet these studies have limitations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We report the results from two longitudinal studies (combined <i>N</i> = 13,822) conducted in the United Kingdom that measure childhood personality (5–11 years old) and political ideology from puberty (age 16) to early (age 26) and middle adulthood (age 42).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We find very weak and inconsistent evidence that childhood personality traits related to negativity bias are directly associated with general conservatism, social conservatism, or economic conservatism across different stages of adulthood. Across the board, Bayes Factors most often indicate strong evidence for the null hypothesis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>We offer evidence that the results of previous research are not as robust or as consistent as scholars in the extant literature presume. Our findings call for more, not less, research on the link between childhood personality and political ideology.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Personality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jopy.12874\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Personality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jopy.12874\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jopy.12874","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们通过更多的数据和测量方法,增加了童年个性与成人意识形态联系研究的深度和广度:我们通过更多的数据、措施和测量方法来增加童年个性与成年意识形态之间联系的研究深度和广度:背景:过去的(政治)心理学研究认为,心理需求的个体差异会影响意识形态。支持这一观点的大多数证据都是横断面的。之前的两项纵向研究显示,有初步证据表明,与消极偏差有关的童年人格特质与成年后的政治意识形态相关,但这些研究存在局限性:我们报告了在英国进行的两项纵向研究(总人数=13,822 人)的结果,这两项研究测量了从青春期(16 岁)到成年早期(26 岁)和成年中期(42 岁)的童年人格(5-11 岁)和政治意识形态:我们发现,在成年后的不同阶段,与消极偏差有关的童年人格特质与总体保守主义、社会保守主义或经济保守主义直接相关的证据非常薄弱,且不一致。在所有研究中,贝叶斯因子最常见的情况是为零假设提供强有力的证据:我们提供的证据表明,以往的研究结果并不像学者们在现有文献中推测的那样稳健或一致。我们的研究结果要求对童年人格与政治意识形态之间的联系进行更多而不是更少的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Inconsistent and very weak evidence for a direct association between childhood personality and adult ideology

Inconsistent and very weak evidence for a direct association between childhood personality and adult ideology

Objective

We add depth and breadth to the study of the childhood personality–adult ideology link with additional data, measures, and measurement approaches.

Background

Past research in (political) psychology has put forward that individual differences in psychological needs shape ideology. Most evidence supporting this claim is cross-sectional. Two previous longitudinal studies showed preliminary evidence that childhood personality traits linked to negativity bias correlate with political ideology in adulthood, yet these studies have limitations.

Methods

We report the results from two longitudinal studies (combined N = 13,822) conducted in the United Kingdom that measure childhood personality (5–11 years old) and political ideology from puberty (age 16) to early (age 26) and middle adulthood (age 42).

Results

We find very weak and inconsistent evidence that childhood personality traits related to negativity bias are directly associated with general conservatism, social conservatism, or economic conservatism across different stages of adulthood. Across the board, Bayes Factors most often indicate strong evidence for the null hypothesis.

Conclusion

We offer evidence that the results of previous research are not as robust or as consistent as scholars in the extant literature presume. Our findings call for more, not less, research on the link between childhood personality and political ideology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personality
Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
6.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Journal of Personality publishes scientific investigations in the field of personality. It focuses particularly on personality and behavior dynamics, personality development, and individual differences in the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal domains. The journal reflects and stimulates interest in the growth of new theoretical and methodological approaches in personality psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信