印度第二波疫情与第一波疫情的比较——单中心体验

Mayank Kapoor, Budha O Singh, Prasan Kumar Panda, Pathik Dhanger, Anant Kataria
{"title":"印度第二波疫情与第一波疫情的比较——单中心体验","authors":"Mayank Kapoor,&nbsp;Budha O Singh,&nbsp;Prasan Kumar Panda,&nbsp;Pathik Dhanger,&nbsp;Anant Kataria","doi":"10.2174/2772434417666220628153110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has resurfaced in India as a hardhitting second wave. This study aims to compare the clinical profile of the first wave (April-June 2020) and the second wave (March-May 2021) of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 pandemic (SARS-CoV-2) in a single tertiary care center in India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational study, we examined the demographic profile, symptoms at presentation, severity of illness, baseline investigations, treatments received, underlying comorbidities, and outcomes of the COVID-19 patients belonging to the first (W1) and the second wave (W2) of the pandemic in India.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The age group affected most in the W2 is 50.5 (17.7) versus 37·1 (16·9) years for W1. The baseline oxygen saturation is lower in W2, being 84·0 (13·4) % compared with 91·9 (7·4) % in W1 [SpO2 < 90% OR 14.3 (6.1-33), P < 0.0001]. 70.2 % of the cases belonged to the severe category in W2 compared to 37.5% in W1. W2 has worse outcomes. Incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [48.7% v/s 6.45%; OR 15.4 (6.5-35.7), P<0.0001], Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) [18% v/s 2.4%; OR 6 (1.7- 22.2), P = 0.005], Acute Liver Injury (transaminitis) [12.8% v/s 6.4%, OR 7.3 (3.7- 14.3), P < 0.0001], and deaths (29% v/s 9.6%, standardized mortality ratio 3.5) is higher in W2. Similarly, the CT severity score for W2 [29.5 (6.7)] was higher than W1 [23·2 (11·5), P < 0.05]. The proportion of patients requiring oxygen [81.8% v/s 11.2%; OR 125 (40-333.3), P < 0.0001], high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) (11.4% v/s 5.6%), Non- Invasive Ventilation (NIV) (41.2% v/s 1.5%), invasive ventilation [24.5% v/s 0.9%; OR 22.72 (2.94-166.6), P = 0.003], as well as ICU/HDU admissions [56.4% v/s 12.0%; OR 10.5 (5.3-21.2), P < 0.0001] was higher for W2 as compared with W1. Cough, invasive ventilation, inotrope requirement, and ARDS are significantly related to higher mortality in the W2 than W1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher age, oxygen requirement, ventilator requirement, ICU admission, and organ failure are more prevalent in the admitted COVID-19 cases during the second wave that hit India than in the first wave and are associated with more fatalities. Strategy for another wave should be planned accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":74643,"journal":{"name":"Recent advances in anti-infective drug discovery","volume":"17 3","pages":"178-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing India's Second COVID Wave with the First Wave-A Single-Center Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Mayank Kapoor,&nbsp;Budha O Singh,&nbsp;Prasan Kumar Panda,&nbsp;Pathik Dhanger,&nbsp;Anant Kataria\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/2772434417666220628153110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has resurfaced in India as a hardhitting second wave. This study aims to compare the clinical profile of the first wave (April-June 2020) and the second wave (March-May 2021) of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 pandemic (SARS-CoV-2) in a single tertiary care center in India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational study, we examined the demographic profile, symptoms at presentation, severity of illness, baseline investigations, treatments received, underlying comorbidities, and outcomes of the COVID-19 patients belonging to the first (W1) and the second wave (W2) of the pandemic in India.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The age group affected most in the W2 is 50.5 (17.7) versus 37·1 (16·9) years for W1. The baseline oxygen saturation is lower in W2, being 84·0 (13·4) % compared with 91·9 (7·4) % in W1 [SpO2 < 90% OR 14.3 (6.1-33), P < 0.0001]. 70.2 % of the cases belonged to the severe category in W2 compared to 37.5% in W1. W2 has worse outcomes. Incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [48.7% v/s 6.45%; OR 15.4 (6.5-35.7), P<0.0001], Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) [18% v/s 2.4%; OR 6 (1.7- 22.2), P = 0.005], Acute Liver Injury (transaminitis) [12.8% v/s 6.4%, OR 7.3 (3.7- 14.3), P < 0.0001], and deaths (29% v/s 9.6%, standardized mortality ratio 3.5) is higher in W2. Similarly, the CT severity score for W2 [29.5 (6.7)] was higher than W1 [23·2 (11·5), P < 0.05]. The proportion of patients requiring oxygen [81.8% v/s 11.2%; OR 125 (40-333.3), P < 0.0001], high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) (11.4% v/s 5.6%), Non- Invasive Ventilation (NIV) (41.2% v/s 1.5%), invasive ventilation [24.5% v/s 0.9%; OR 22.72 (2.94-166.6), P = 0.003], as well as ICU/HDU admissions [56.4% v/s 12.0%; OR 10.5 (5.3-21.2), P < 0.0001] was higher for W2 as compared with W1. Cough, invasive ventilation, inotrope requirement, and ARDS are significantly related to higher mortality in the W2 than W1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher age, oxygen requirement, ventilator requirement, ICU admission, and organ failure are more prevalent in the admitted COVID-19 cases during the second wave that hit India than in the first wave and are associated with more fatalities. Strategy for another wave should be planned accordingly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recent advances in anti-infective drug discovery\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"178-186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recent advances in anti-infective drug discovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/2772434417666220628153110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent advances in anti-infective drug discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2772434417666220628153110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行在印度再次出现,成为第二波严重疫情。本研究旨在比较印度一个三级医疗中心第一波(2020年4月至6月)和第二波(2021年3月至5月)严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2大流行(SARS-CoV-2)的临床特征。方法:在这项回顾性观察性研究中,我们检查了印度属于大流行第一波(W1)和第二波(W2)的COVID-19患者的人口统计学特征、首发症状、疾病严重程度、基线调查、接受的治疗、潜在合并症和结局。结果:W2发病年龄为50.5(17.7)岁,W1发病年龄为37.1(16.9)岁。基线血氧饱和度在W2组较低,为88.4(13.4)%,而在W1组为99.1 (7.4)% [SpO2 < 90% OR 14.3 (6.1-33), P < 0.0001]。W2重症病例占70.2%,W1重症病例占37.5%。W2的结果更差。急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)发病率[48.7% v/s 6.45%;OR 15.4 (6.5-35.7), p结论:与第一波相比,在印度第二波COVID-19入院病例中,年龄、需氧量、呼吸机需求、ICU入院和器官衰竭更为普遍,并与更多的死亡相关。应该相应地规划另一波浪潮的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing India's Second COVID Wave with the First Wave-A Single-Center Experience.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has resurfaced in India as a hardhitting second wave. This study aims to compare the clinical profile of the first wave (April-June 2020) and the second wave (March-May 2021) of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 pandemic (SARS-CoV-2) in a single tertiary care center in India.

Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we examined the demographic profile, symptoms at presentation, severity of illness, baseline investigations, treatments received, underlying comorbidities, and outcomes of the COVID-19 patients belonging to the first (W1) and the second wave (W2) of the pandemic in India.

Results: The age group affected most in the W2 is 50.5 (17.7) versus 37·1 (16·9) years for W1. The baseline oxygen saturation is lower in W2, being 84·0 (13·4) % compared with 91·9 (7·4) % in W1 [SpO2 < 90% OR 14.3 (6.1-33), P < 0.0001]. 70.2 % of the cases belonged to the severe category in W2 compared to 37.5% in W1. W2 has worse outcomes. Incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [48.7% v/s 6.45%; OR 15.4 (6.5-35.7), P<0.0001], Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) [18% v/s 2.4%; OR 6 (1.7- 22.2), P = 0.005], Acute Liver Injury (transaminitis) [12.8% v/s 6.4%, OR 7.3 (3.7- 14.3), P < 0.0001], and deaths (29% v/s 9.6%, standardized mortality ratio 3.5) is higher in W2. Similarly, the CT severity score for W2 [29.5 (6.7)] was higher than W1 [23·2 (11·5), P < 0.05]. The proportion of patients requiring oxygen [81.8% v/s 11.2%; OR 125 (40-333.3), P < 0.0001], high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) (11.4% v/s 5.6%), Non- Invasive Ventilation (NIV) (41.2% v/s 1.5%), invasive ventilation [24.5% v/s 0.9%; OR 22.72 (2.94-166.6), P = 0.003], as well as ICU/HDU admissions [56.4% v/s 12.0%; OR 10.5 (5.3-21.2), P < 0.0001] was higher for W2 as compared with W1. Cough, invasive ventilation, inotrope requirement, and ARDS are significantly related to higher mortality in the W2 than W1.

Conclusion: Higher age, oxygen requirement, ventilator requirement, ICU admission, and organ failure are more prevalent in the admitted COVID-19 cases during the second wave that hit India than in the first wave and are associated with more fatalities. Strategy for another wave should be planned accordingly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信