心脏迷走神经活动与女性肠道微生物群模式相关——一项探索性初步研究。

IF 8.3 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Sabrina Mörkl, Andreas Oberascher, Josef M Tatschl, Sonja Lackner, Thomaz F S Bastiaanssen, Mary I Butler, Maximilian Moser, Matthias Frühwirth, Harald Mangge, John F Cryan, Timothy G Dinan, Sandra J Holasek
{"title":"心脏迷走神经活动与女性肠道微生物群模式相关——一项探索性初步研究。","authors":"Sabrina Mörkl,&nbsp;Andreas Oberascher,&nbsp;Josef M Tatschl,&nbsp;Sonja Lackner,&nbsp;Thomaz F S Bastiaanssen,&nbsp;Mary I Butler,&nbsp;Maximilian Moser,&nbsp;Matthias Frühwirth,&nbsp;Harald Mangge,&nbsp;John F Cryan,&nbsp;Timothy G Dinan,&nbsp;Sandra J Holasek","doi":"10.1080/19585969.2022.2128697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A functional reciprocity between the gut microbiome and vagal nerve activity has been suggested, however, human studies addressing this phenomenon are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four-hour cardiac vagal activity (CVA) was assessed from 73 female participants (aged 24.5 ± 4.3 years). Additionally, stool samples were subjected to 16SrRNA gene analysis (V1-V2). Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) was used to analyse microbiome data. Additionally, inflammatory parameters (such as CRP and IL-6) were derived from serum samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Daytime CVA correlated significantly with gut microbiota diversity (<i>r</i> <sub>sp</sub> = 0.254, <i>p</i> = 0.030), CRP (<i>r</i> <sub>sp</sub> = -0.348, <i>p</i> = 0.003), and IL-6 (<i>r</i> <sub>sp</sub> = -0.320, <i>p</i> = 0.006). When the group was divided at the median of 24 h CVA (Mdn = 1.322), the following features were more abundant in the high CVA group: <i>Clostridia</i> (Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LDA) = 4.195, <i>p</i> = 0.029), <i>Clostridiales</i> (LDA = 4.195, <i>p</i> = 0.029), <i>Lachnospira</i> (LDA = 3.489, <i>p</i> = 0.004), <i>Ruminococcaceae</i> (LDA = 4.073, <i>p</i> = 0.010), <i>Faecalibacterium</i> (LDA = 3.982, <i>p</i> = 0.042), <i>Lactobacillales</i> (LDA = 3.317, <i>p</i> = 0.029), <i>Bacilli</i> (LDA = 3.294, <i>p</i> = 0.0350), <i>Streptococcaceae</i> (LDA = 3.353, <i>p</i> = 0.006), <i>Streptococcus</i> (LDA = 3.332, <i>p</i> = 0.011). Based on Dirichlet multinomial mixtures two enterotypes could be detected, which differed significantly in CVA, age, BMI, CRP, IL-6, and diversity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As an indicator of gut-brain communication, gut microbiome analysis could be extended by measurements of CVA to enhance our understanding of signalling <i>via</i> microbiota-gut-brain-axis and its alterations through psychobiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":54343,"journal":{"name":"Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"24 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9559470/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiac vagal activity is associated with gut-microbiome patterns in women-An exploratory pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Mörkl,&nbsp;Andreas Oberascher,&nbsp;Josef M Tatschl,&nbsp;Sonja Lackner,&nbsp;Thomaz F S Bastiaanssen,&nbsp;Mary I Butler,&nbsp;Maximilian Moser,&nbsp;Matthias Frühwirth,&nbsp;Harald Mangge,&nbsp;John F Cryan,&nbsp;Timothy G Dinan,&nbsp;Sandra J Holasek\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19585969.2022.2128697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A functional reciprocity between the gut microbiome and vagal nerve activity has been suggested, however, human studies addressing this phenomenon are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four-hour cardiac vagal activity (CVA) was assessed from 73 female participants (aged 24.5 ± 4.3 years). Additionally, stool samples were subjected to 16SrRNA gene analysis (V1-V2). Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) was used to analyse microbiome data. Additionally, inflammatory parameters (such as CRP and IL-6) were derived from serum samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Daytime CVA correlated significantly with gut microbiota diversity (<i>r</i> <sub>sp</sub> = 0.254, <i>p</i> = 0.030), CRP (<i>r</i> <sub>sp</sub> = -0.348, <i>p</i> = 0.003), and IL-6 (<i>r</i> <sub>sp</sub> = -0.320, <i>p</i> = 0.006). When the group was divided at the median of 24 h CVA (Mdn = 1.322), the following features were more abundant in the high CVA group: <i>Clostridia</i> (Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LDA) = 4.195, <i>p</i> = 0.029), <i>Clostridiales</i> (LDA = 4.195, <i>p</i> = 0.029), <i>Lachnospira</i> (LDA = 3.489, <i>p</i> = 0.004), <i>Ruminococcaceae</i> (LDA = 4.073, <i>p</i> = 0.010), <i>Faecalibacterium</i> (LDA = 3.982, <i>p</i> = 0.042), <i>Lactobacillales</i> (LDA = 3.317, <i>p</i> = 0.029), <i>Bacilli</i> (LDA = 3.294, <i>p</i> = 0.0350), <i>Streptococcaceae</i> (LDA = 3.353, <i>p</i> = 0.006), <i>Streptococcus</i> (LDA = 3.332, <i>p</i> = 0.011). Based on Dirichlet multinomial mixtures two enterotypes could be detected, which differed significantly in CVA, age, BMI, CRP, IL-6, and diversity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As an indicator of gut-brain communication, gut microbiome analysis could be extended by measurements of CVA to enhance our understanding of signalling <i>via</i> microbiota-gut-brain-axis and its alterations through psychobiotics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9559470/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19585969.2022.2128697\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19585969.2022.2128697","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

导读:肠道微生物群和迷走神经活动之间的功能互惠已被提出,然而,针对这一现象的人类研究是有限的。方法:对73名女性(年龄24.5±4.3岁)进行24小时心脏迷走神经活动(CVA)评估。此外,粪便样本进行16SrRNA基因分析(V1-V2)。微生物生态学定量洞察(QIIME)用于分析微生物组数据。此外,从血清样本中提取炎症参数(如CRP和IL-6)。结果:白天CVA与肠道菌群多样性(r sp = 0.254, p = 0.030)、CRP (r sp = -0.348, p = 0.003)、IL-6 (r sp = -0.320, p = 0.006)显著相关。在24 h CVA中位数(Mdn = 1.322)分组时,高CVA组的以下特征更为丰富:梭菌(线性判别分析效应值(LDA) = 4.195, p = 0.029)、梭菌(LDA = 4.195, p = 0.029)、毛螺旋体(LDA = 3.489, p = 0.004)、瘤胃球菌科(LDA = 4.073, p = 0.010)、粪杆菌(LDA = 3.982, p = 0.042)、乳酸杆菌(LDA = 3.317, p = 0.029)、杆菌(LDA = 3.294, p = 0.0350)、链球菌科(LDA = 3.353, p = 0.006)、链球菌(LDA = 3.332, p = 0.011)。基于Dirichlet多项式混合可以检测到两种肠型,CVA、年龄、BMI、CRP、IL-6和多样性差异显著。结论:作为肠-脑通讯的一个指标,肠道微生物组分析可以通过CVA的测量来扩展,以增强我们对微生物-肠-脑-轴信号传导及其通过心理生物改变的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cardiac vagal activity is associated with gut-microbiome patterns in women-An exploratory pilot study.

Cardiac vagal activity is associated with gut-microbiome patterns in women-An exploratory pilot study.

Introduction: A functional reciprocity between the gut microbiome and vagal nerve activity has been suggested, however, human studies addressing this phenomenon are limited.

Methods: Twenty-four-hour cardiac vagal activity (CVA) was assessed from 73 female participants (aged 24.5 ± 4.3 years). Additionally, stool samples were subjected to 16SrRNA gene analysis (V1-V2). Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) was used to analyse microbiome data. Additionally, inflammatory parameters (such as CRP and IL-6) were derived from serum samples.

Results: Daytime CVA correlated significantly with gut microbiota diversity (r sp = 0.254, p = 0.030), CRP (r sp = -0.348, p = 0.003), and IL-6 (r sp = -0.320, p = 0.006). When the group was divided at the median of 24 h CVA (Mdn = 1.322), the following features were more abundant in the high CVA group: Clostridia (Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LDA) = 4.195, p = 0.029), Clostridiales (LDA = 4.195, p = 0.029), Lachnospira (LDA = 3.489, p = 0.004), Ruminococcaceae (LDA = 4.073, p = 0.010), Faecalibacterium (LDA = 3.982, p = 0.042), Lactobacillales (LDA = 3.317, p = 0.029), Bacilli (LDA = 3.294, p = 0.0350), Streptococcaceae (LDA = 3.353, p = 0.006), Streptococcus (LDA = 3.332, p = 0.011). Based on Dirichlet multinomial mixtures two enterotypes could be detected, which differed significantly in CVA, age, BMI, CRP, IL-6, and diversity.

Conclusions: As an indicator of gut-brain communication, gut microbiome analysis could be extended by measurements of CVA to enhance our understanding of signalling via microbiota-gut-brain-axis and its alterations through psychobiotics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience
Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
1.20%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience (DCNS) endeavors to bridge the gap between clinical neuropsychiatry and the neurosciences by offering state-of-the-art information and original insights into pertinent clinical, biological, and therapeutic aspects. As an open access journal, DCNS ensures accessibility to its content for all interested parties. Each issue is curated to include expert reviews, original articles, and brief reports, carefully selected to offer a comprehensive understanding of the evolving landscape in clinical neuroscience. Join us in advancing knowledge and fostering dialogue in this dynamic field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信