日本工人死亡率的估计。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tatsuki Kimura, Michiya Sasaki, Takatoshi Hattori
{"title":"日本工人死亡率的估计。","authors":"Tatsuki Kimura,&nbsp;Michiya Sasaki,&nbsp;Takatoshi Hattori","doi":"10.1186/s12995-022-00365-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk-based decision-making is used to identify risk factors for which threshold points have not been identified. The occupational mortality rate was referred to as a reference risk. This study aimed to analyze recent trends in worker mortality using three data sources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Reports of Worker Casualties (RWC), the Annual Statistics Report of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Council (ASR), and the Annual Business Report of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Council (ABR) were used. Mortality rates were estimated by age group and industry category (overall, and manufacturing and construction industries) from 1991 to 2019. The mortality rates were compared with those estimated in Western countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mortality rates for the three industry categories in the RWC and ASR decreased, whereas those for the manufacturing and construction industries in the ABR did not. In 2019, the mortality rates in the ABR were 3.1, 4.8, and 3.1 times higher than those in the RWC overall and in the manufacturing and construction industries, respectively. The differences decreased when deaths after long-term medical treatment were considered. The mortality rate trends in Japan were similar to those in Western countries. The upper mortality rate among Japan and Western countries was at least five to 15 times higher than the lowest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When occupational mortality rates are used as a reference risk, it is important to consider any changes with time, the data sources used, and the differences between countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":48903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology","volume":"17 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9753261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of the mortality rate of workers in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Tatsuki Kimura,&nbsp;Michiya Sasaki,&nbsp;Takatoshi Hattori\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12995-022-00365-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk-based decision-making is used to identify risk factors for which threshold points have not been identified. The occupational mortality rate was referred to as a reference risk. This study aimed to analyze recent trends in worker mortality using three data sources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Reports of Worker Casualties (RWC), the Annual Statistics Report of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Council (ASR), and the Annual Business Report of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Council (ABR) were used. Mortality rates were estimated by age group and industry category (overall, and manufacturing and construction industries) from 1991 to 2019. The mortality rates were compared with those estimated in Western countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mortality rates for the three industry categories in the RWC and ASR decreased, whereas those for the manufacturing and construction industries in the ABR did not. In 2019, the mortality rates in the ABR were 3.1, 4.8, and 3.1 times higher than those in the RWC overall and in the manufacturing and construction industries, respectively. The differences decreased when deaths after long-term medical treatment were considered. The mortality rate trends in Japan were similar to those in Western countries. The upper mortality rate among Japan and Western countries was at least five to 15 times higher than the lowest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When occupational mortality rates are used as a reference risk, it is important to consider any changes with time, the data sources used, and the differences between countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9753261/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-022-00365-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-022-00365-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于风险的决策用于识别阈值点尚未确定的风险因素。职业死亡率被称为参考风险。本研究旨在利用三个数据来源分析工人死亡率的最新趋势。方法:采用职工伤亡报告(RWC)、工业事故赔偿保险理事会(ASR)年度统计报告和工业事故赔偿保险理事会(ABR)年度业务报告。从1991年到2019年,死亡率按年龄组和行业类别(总体以及制造业和建筑业)进行了估计。与西方国家的估计死亡率进行了比较。结果:RWC和ASR中三个行业的死亡率下降,而ABR中制造业和建筑业的死亡率没有下降。2019年,ABR的死亡率分别是RWC总体死亡率的3.1倍、4.8倍和3.1倍,制造业和建筑业的死亡率分别是RWC的4.8倍和3.1倍。当考虑到长期治疗后的死亡时,差异就减小了。日本的死亡率趋势与西方国家相似。日本和西方国家的最高死亡率至少是最低死亡率的5至15倍。结论:当使用职业死亡率作为参考风险时,重要的是要考虑随时间的变化、所使用的数据来源以及国家之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Estimation of the mortality rate of workers in Japan.

Estimation of the mortality rate of workers in Japan.

Estimation of the mortality rate of workers in Japan.

Estimation of the mortality rate of workers in Japan.

Background: Risk-based decision-making is used to identify risk factors for which threshold points have not been identified. The occupational mortality rate was referred to as a reference risk. This study aimed to analyze recent trends in worker mortality using three data sources.

Methods: The Reports of Worker Casualties (RWC), the Annual Statistics Report of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Council (ASR), and the Annual Business Report of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Council (ABR) were used. Mortality rates were estimated by age group and industry category (overall, and manufacturing and construction industries) from 1991 to 2019. The mortality rates were compared with those estimated in Western countries.

Results: The mortality rates for the three industry categories in the RWC and ASR decreased, whereas those for the manufacturing and construction industries in the ABR did not. In 2019, the mortality rates in the ABR were 3.1, 4.8, and 3.1 times higher than those in the RWC overall and in the manufacturing and construction industries, respectively. The differences decreased when deaths after long-term medical treatment were considered. The mortality rate trends in Japan were similar to those in Western countries. The upper mortality rate among Japan and Western countries was at least five to 15 times higher than the lowest.

Conclusion: When occupational mortality rates are used as a reference risk, it is important to consider any changes with time, the data sources used, and the differences between countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Aimed at clinicians and researchers, the Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology is a multi-disciplinary, open access journal which publishes original research on the clinical and scientific aspects of occupational and environmental health. With high-quality peer review and quick decision times, we welcome submissions on the diagnosis, prevention, management, and scientific analysis of occupational diseases, injuries, and disability. The journal also covers the promotion of health of workers, their families, and communities, and ranges from rehabilitation to tropical medicine and public health aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信