回顾:预防或管理教育环境中学生自我伤害的干预措施--系统性综述。

IF 6.8 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Rasanat Fatima Nawaz, Joanna K. Anderson, Louise Colville, Catherine Fraser-Andrews, Tamsin Jane Ford
{"title":"回顾:预防或管理教育环境中学生自我伤害的干预措施--系统性综述。","authors":"Rasanat Fatima Nawaz,&nbsp;Joanna K. Anderson,&nbsp;Louise Colville,&nbsp;Catherine Fraser-Andrews,&nbsp;Tamsin Jane Ford","doi":"10.1111/camh.12634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>At least half of all young people who die by suicide have previously self-harmed and most of those who self-harm will not seek help from health services for self-harming behaviours. By default, schools, colleges and universities necessarily play a key role in identifying those who self-harm and supporting them to access help.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021243692) of five databases (Medline, PsycINFO, ASSIA, ERIC and BEI) for quantitative studies evaluating interventions to reduce self-harm among students in schools, colleges and universities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified six eligible studies that reported interventions. Two interventions used mindfulness-based approaches and the remaining four interventions focused on in-classroom education. Three interventions reported a significant reduction in self-harm, all three used in-classroom education. Of the six studies, one study was rated methodologically moderate, while the remaining five were weak.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In summary, the evidence base is limited in size and quality. Most current interventions to address self-harm in schools focus on training staff in awareness, with a significant gap in direct support for students.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49291,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":"29 1","pages":"56-69"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/camh.12634","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review: Interventions to prevent or manage self-harm among students in educational settings – a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Rasanat Fatima Nawaz,&nbsp;Joanna K. Anderson,&nbsp;Louise Colville,&nbsp;Catherine Fraser-Andrews,&nbsp;Tamsin Jane Ford\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/camh.12634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>At least half of all young people who die by suicide have previously self-harmed and most of those who self-harm will not seek help from health services for self-harming behaviours. By default, schools, colleges and universities necessarily play a key role in identifying those who self-harm and supporting them to access help.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021243692) of five databases (Medline, PsycINFO, ASSIA, ERIC and BEI) for quantitative studies evaluating interventions to reduce self-harm among students in schools, colleges and universities.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We identified six eligible studies that reported interventions. Two interventions used mindfulness-based approaches and the remaining four interventions focused on in-classroom education. Three interventions reported a significant reduction in self-harm, all three used in-classroom education. Of the six studies, one study was rated methodologically moderate, while the remaining five were weak.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In summary, the evidence base is limited in size and quality. Most current interventions to address self-harm in schools focus on training staff in awareness, with a significant gap in direct support for students.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child and Adolescent Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"56-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/camh.12634\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child and Adolescent Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/camh.12634\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/camh.12634","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在所有自杀身亡的青少年中,至少有一半曾经有过自我伤害行为,而大多数自我伤害者不会因自我伤害行为向医疗服务机构寻求帮助。因此,学校、学院和大学必须在识别自我伤害者并支持他们寻求帮助方面发挥关键作用:我们对五个数据库(Medline、PsycINFO、ASSIA、ERIC 和 BEI)进行了系统性回顾(PROSPERO ID:CRD42021243692),以了解对减少中小学和大学学生自我伤害的干预措施进行评估的定量研究:我们确定了六项符合条件的研究,这些研究报告了干预措施。其中两项干预措施采用了正念方法,其余四项干预措施侧重于课堂教育。有三项干预报告称自残现象明显减少,这三项干预都采用了课堂教育。在这六项研究中,一项研究的方法被评为中等,其余五项研究的方法被评为弱:总之,证据基础的规模和质量都很有限。目前针对学校自残问题的大多数干预措施都侧重于培训教职员工的自残意识,而在为学生提供直接支持方面还存在很大差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Review: Interventions to prevent or manage self-harm among students in educational settings – a systematic review

Review: Interventions to prevent or manage self-harm among students in educational settings – a systematic review

Background

At least half of all young people who die by suicide have previously self-harmed and most of those who self-harm will not seek help from health services for self-harming behaviours. By default, schools, colleges and universities necessarily play a key role in identifying those who self-harm and supporting them to access help.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021243692) of five databases (Medline, PsycINFO, ASSIA, ERIC and BEI) for quantitative studies evaluating interventions to reduce self-harm among students in schools, colleges and universities.

Results

We identified six eligible studies that reported interventions. Two interventions used mindfulness-based approaches and the remaining four interventions focused on in-classroom education. Three interventions reported a significant reduction in self-harm, all three used in-classroom education. Of the six studies, one study was rated methodologically moderate, while the remaining five were weak.

Conclusion

In summary, the evidence base is limited in size and quality. Most current interventions to address self-harm in schools focus on training staff in awareness, with a significant gap in direct support for students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Child and Adolescent Mental Health PEDIATRICS-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
77
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMH) publishes high quality, peer-reviewed child and adolescent mental health services research of relevance to academics, clinicians and commissioners internationally. The journal''s principal aim is to foster evidence-based clinical practice and clinically orientated research among clinicians and health services researchers working with children and adolescents, parents and their families in relation to or with a particular interest in mental health. CAMH publishes reviews, original articles, and pilot reports of innovative approaches, interventions, clinical methods and service developments. The journal has regular sections on Measurement Issues, Innovations in Practice, Global Child Mental Health and Humanities. All published papers should be of direct relevance to mental health practitioners and clearly draw out clinical implications for the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信