儿童强迫症症状激发前后认知计划的fMRI研究。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Fern Jaspers-Fayer, Sarah Yao Lin, John R Best, Anders Lillevik Thorsen, Juliana Negreiros, Elaine Chan, Rhonda Ellwyn, Boyee Lin, Stella de Wit, Odile A van den Heuvel, S Evelyn Stewart
{"title":"儿童强迫症症状激发前后认知计划的fMRI研究。","authors":"Fern Jaspers-Fayer,&nbsp;Sarah Yao Lin,&nbsp;John R Best,&nbsp;Anders Lillevik Thorsen,&nbsp;Juliana Negreiros,&nbsp;Elaine Chan,&nbsp;Rhonda Ellwyn,&nbsp;Boyee Lin,&nbsp;Stella de Wit,&nbsp;Odile A van den Heuvel,&nbsp;S Evelyn Stewart","doi":"10.1503/jpn.220064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been associated with poorer planning in laboratory, school and home settings. It is unclear whether this impairment is a standalone cognitive issue or the result of OCD symptoms. No study has examined the influence of provoked distress on planning performance and neural correlates in pediatric OCD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Before and after a symptom provocation task, youth with OCD (<i>n</i> = 23; 9 boys; mean age ± standard deviation 15.1 ± 2.6 years) and matched healthy controls (<i>n</i> = 23) completed the Tower of London task during functional MRI scanning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During planning, participants with OCD recruited the left superior frontal gyrus to a greater extent than healthy controls after symptom provocation (group × time point interaction; <i>t</i> <sub>44</sub> = 5.22, <i>p <</i> 0.001). In a seeded, region of interest-constrained, functional connectivity analysis, we identified greater connectivity between the left superior frontal gyrus and the right middle frontal gyrus, left precuneus and left inferior parietal lobule in participants with OCD than healthy controls. We also identified greater connectivity between the right amygdala and right medial frontal gyrus in patients with OCD than healthy controls, but only before symptom provocation.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The fixed-order design of the study and the number of participants taking medication (<i>n</i> = 20) should be noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants with OCD demonstrated greater amygdalar-cortical connectivity before symptom provocation, while sustaining greater recruitment and connectivity of task-related planning areas throughout the task. These results suggest that brain activity and connectivity is altered after symptom provocation, in the absence of impaired planning performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","volume":"47 6","pages":"E409-E420"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bc/80/47-6-E409.PMC9710544.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An fMRI study of cognitive planning before and after symptom provocation in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Fern Jaspers-Fayer,&nbsp;Sarah Yao Lin,&nbsp;John R Best,&nbsp;Anders Lillevik Thorsen,&nbsp;Juliana Negreiros,&nbsp;Elaine Chan,&nbsp;Rhonda Ellwyn,&nbsp;Boyee Lin,&nbsp;Stella de Wit,&nbsp;Odile A van den Heuvel,&nbsp;S Evelyn Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1503/jpn.220064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been associated with poorer planning in laboratory, school and home settings. It is unclear whether this impairment is a standalone cognitive issue or the result of OCD symptoms. No study has examined the influence of provoked distress on planning performance and neural correlates in pediatric OCD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Before and after a symptom provocation task, youth with OCD (<i>n</i> = 23; 9 boys; mean age ± standard deviation 15.1 ± 2.6 years) and matched healthy controls (<i>n</i> = 23) completed the Tower of London task during functional MRI scanning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During planning, participants with OCD recruited the left superior frontal gyrus to a greater extent than healthy controls after symptom provocation (group × time point interaction; <i>t</i> <sub>44</sub> = 5.22, <i>p <</i> 0.001). In a seeded, region of interest-constrained, functional connectivity analysis, we identified greater connectivity between the left superior frontal gyrus and the right middle frontal gyrus, left precuneus and left inferior parietal lobule in participants with OCD than healthy controls. We also identified greater connectivity between the right amygdala and right medial frontal gyrus in patients with OCD than healthy controls, but only before symptom provocation.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The fixed-order design of the study and the number of participants taking medication (<i>n</i> = 20) should be noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants with OCD demonstrated greater amygdalar-cortical connectivity before symptom provocation, while sustaining greater recruitment and connectivity of task-related planning areas throughout the task. These results suggest that brain activity and connectivity is altered after symptom provocation, in the absence of impaired planning performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"47 6\",\"pages\":\"E409-E420\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bc/80/47-6-E409.PMC9710544.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.220064\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.220064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:儿童强迫症(OCD)与实验室、学校和家庭环境中较差的计划有关。目前尚不清楚这种损伤是独立的认知问题还是强迫症症状的结果。目前还没有研究考察了挑衅性焦虑对儿童强迫症计划表现和神经相关的影响。方法:青少年强迫症患者(n = 23;9的男孩;平均年龄±标准差15.1±2.6岁)和匹配的健康对照(n = 23)在功能MRI扫描期间完成伦敦塔任务。结果:在计划过程中,强迫症被试在症状激发后比健康对照组更大程度地招募左侧额上回(组×时间点相互作用;t44 = 5.22, p 0.001)。在兴趣受限区域的功能性连通性分析中,我们发现强迫症参与者的左额上回与右额中回、左楔前叶和左顶叶下小叶之间的连通性比健康对照组更强。我们还发现强迫症患者的右侧杏仁核和右侧内侧额回之间的连通性比健康对照组更强,但这只是在症状引发之前。局限性:需要注意研究的定序设计和受试者服药人数(n = 20)。结论:强迫症参与者在症状激发前表现出更大的杏仁核-皮层连通性,同时在整个任务过程中保持更大的任务相关规划区域的招募和连通性。这些结果表明,在没有受损的计划表现的情况下,大脑活动和连通性在症状激发后被改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An fMRI study of cognitive planning before and after symptom provocation in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.

An fMRI study of cognitive planning before and after symptom provocation in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.

An fMRI study of cognitive planning before and after symptom provocation in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.

An fMRI study of cognitive planning before and after symptom provocation in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Background: Pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been associated with poorer planning in laboratory, school and home settings. It is unclear whether this impairment is a standalone cognitive issue or the result of OCD symptoms. No study has examined the influence of provoked distress on planning performance and neural correlates in pediatric OCD.

Methods: Before and after a symptom provocation task, youth with OCD (n = 23; 9 boys; mean age ± standard deviation 15.1 ± 2.6 years) and matched healthy controls (n = 23) completed the Tower of London task during functional MRI scanning.

Results: During planning, participants with OCD recruited the left superior frontal gyrus to a greater extent than healthy controls after symptom provocation (group × time point interaction; t 44 = 5.22, p < 0.001). In a seeded, region of interest-constrained, functional connectivity analysis, we identified greater connectivity between the left superior frontal gyrus and the right middle frontal gyrus, left precuneus and left inferior parietal lobule in participants with OCD than healthy controls. We also identified greater connectivity between the right amygdala and right medial frontal gyrus in patients with OCD than healthy controls, but only before symptom provocation.

Limitations: The fixed-order design of the study and the number of participants taking medication (n = 20) should be noted.

Conclusion: Participants with OCD demonstrated greater amygdalar-cortical connectivity before symptom provocation, while sustaining greater recruitment and connectivity of task-related planning areas throughout the task. These results suggest that brain activity and connectivity is altered after symptom provocation, in the absence of impaired planning performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience publishes papers at the intersection of psychiatry and neuroscience that advance our understanding of the neural mechanisms involved in the etiology and treatment of psychiatric disorders. This includes studies on patients with psychiatric disorders, healthy humans, and experimental animals as well as studies in vitro. Original research articles, including clinical trials with a mechanistic component, and review papers will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信