塞尔维亚语和英语的听众对塞尔维亚语的词汇音高口音不敏感吗?

IF 1.1 3区 文学 Q3 ACOUSTICS
Phonetica Pub Date : 2022-08-26 DOI:10.1515/phon-2022-2023
Dušan Nikolić, Stephen Winters
{"title":"塞尔维亚语和英语的听众对塞尔维亚语的词汇音高口音不敏感吗?","authors":"Dušan Nikolić,&nbsp;Stephen Winters","doi":"10.1515/phon-2022-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The paper investigated possible perceptual insensitivity effects in the perception of lexical pitch accents by native and non-native listeners, that is, by Serbian and English listeners, respectively. The objective of the study was to explore which word-prosodic categories listeners used when they were required to contrast and recall sequences of lexical pitch accents. To that effect, Serbian and English listeners performed a Sequence Recall Task (SRT) in which they contrasted pairs of non-words with different Serbian lexical pitch accent types, and recalled the sequences of these non-words under different memory load conditions. Listeners' answers were coded correct and incorrect and the accuracy scores between the groups were compared and analyzed. Both groups had almost identical levels of accuracy and they performed well above chance level on each contrast. Neither group exhibited any effects of perceptual insensitivity to lexical pitch accents. English (non-native) listeners did not differ in their performance from native Serbian listeners, which, contrary to what previous research suggested, implied that one's native language word-prosodic category inventory did not preclude the encoding of non-native word-prosodic categories. Instead, non-native listeners were capable of deploying different prosodic resources such as post-lexical pitch accents to recall the sequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":55608,"journal":{"name":"Phonetica","volume":"79 4","pages":"397-423"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Serbian and English listeners insensitive to lexical pitch accents in Serbian?\",\"authors\":\"Dušan Nikolić,&nbsp;Stephen Winters\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/phon-2022-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The paper investigated possible perceptual insensitivity effects in the perception of lexical pitch accents by native and non-native listeners, that is, by Serbian and English listeners, respectively. The objective of the study was to explore which word-prosodic categories listeners used when they were required to contrast and recall sequences of lexical pitch accents. To that effect, Serbian and English listeners performed a Sequence Recall Task (SRT) in which they contrasted pairs of non-words with different Serbian lexical pitch accent types, and recalled the sequences of these non-words under different memory load conditions. Listeners' answers were coded correct and incorrect and the accuracy scores between the groups were compared and analyzed. Both groups had almost identical levels of accuracy and they performed well above chance level on each contrast. Neither group exhibited any effects of perceptual insensitivity to lexical pitch accents. English (non-native) listeners did not differ in their performance from native Serbian listeners, which, contrary to what previous research suggested, implied that one's native language word-prosodic category inventory did not preclude the encoding of non-native word-prosodic categories. Instead, non-native listeners were capable of deploying different prosodic resources such as post-lexical pitch accents to recall the sequences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phonetica\",\"volume\":\"79 4\",\"pages\":\"397-423\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phonetica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/phon-2022-2023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phonetica","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/phon-2022-2023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文研究了母语和非母语听众(即塞尔维亚语和英语听众)对词汇音高口音的感知可能存在的感知不敏感效应。这项研究的目的是探索听者在被要求对比和回忆词汇音高重音序列时使用的词韵律类别。为此,塞尔维亚语和英语听众执行了序列回忆任务(SRT),在该任务中,他们对比了不同塞尔维亚语词汇音高重音类型的非单词对,并在不同的记忆负荷条件下回忆了这些非单词的序列。听众的答案被编码为正确和不正确,并比较和分析两组之间的准确性得分。两组人的准确率几乎相同,在每次对比中,他们的表现都远高于随机水平。两组都没有表现出对词汇音高口音的感知不敏感。英语(非母语)听者与塞尔维亚语(母语)听者的表现没有差异,这与以往的研究结果相反,表明母语词汇韵律类别库存并不排除非母语词汇韵律类别的编码。相反,非母语的听者能够利用不同的韵律资源,比如词汇后的音调重音来回忆这些序列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are Serbian and English listeners insensitive to lexical pitch accents in Serbian?

The paper investigated possible perceptual insensitivity effects in the perception of lexical pitch accents by native and non-native listeners, that is, by Serbian and English listeners, respectively. The objective of the study was to explore which word-prosodic categories listeners used when they were required to contrast and recall sequences of lexical pitch accents. To that effect, Serbian and English listeners performed a Sequence Recall Task (SRT) in which they contrasted pairs of non-words with different Serbian lexical pitch accent types, and recalled the sequences of these non-words under different memory load conditions. Listeners' answers were coded correct and incorrect and the accuracy scores between the groups were compared and analyzed. Both groups had almost identical levels of accuracy and they performed well above chance level on each contrast. Neither group exhibited any effects of perceptual insensitivity to lexical pitch accents. English (non-native) listeners did not differ in their performance from native Serbian listeners, which, contrary to what previous research suggested, implied that one's native language word-prosodic category inventory did not preclude the encoding of non-native word-prosodic categories. Instead, non-native listeners were capable of deploying different prosodic resources such as post-lexical pitch accents to recall the sequences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Phonetica
Phonetica 物理-声学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary research into spoken language employs a wide range of approaches, from instrumental measures to perceptual and neurocognitive measures, to computational models, for investigating the properties and principles of speech in communicative settings across the world’s languages. ''Phonetica'' is an international interdisciplinary forum for phonetic science that covers all aspects of the subject matter, from phonetic and phonological descriptions of segments and prosodies to speech physiology, articulation, acoustics, perception, acquisition, and phonetic variation and change. ''Phonetica'' thus provides a platform for a comprehensive understanding of speaker-hearer interaction across languages and dialects, and of learning contexts throughout the lifespan. Papers published in this journal report expert original work that deals both with theoretical issues and with new empirical data, as well as with innovative methods and applications that will help to advance the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信