抗阻训练对60岁及以上老年人生活质量、抑郁、肌肉力量和功能性运动能力的系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Sholeh Khodadad Kashi, Zahra Sadat Mirzazadeh, Vahid Saatchian
{"title":"抗阻训练对60岁及以上老年人生活质量、抑郁、肌肉力量和功能性运动能力的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Sholeh Khodadad Kashi,&nbsp;Zahra Sadat Mirzazadeh,&nbsp;Vahid Saatchian","doi":"10.1177/10998004221120945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aging is generally associated with numerous metabolic and physical changes that augment susceptibility to several chronic conditions, disability, and diminished quality of life.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy of resistance training on quality of life, depression, muscle strength, and functional exercise capacity in older adults (≥60 years).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to December 20, 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>21 studies (<i>N</i> = 1610) were included. Resistance training significantly improved physical functioning (standard mean differences (SMD), 0.31; <i>p =</i> 0.02), mental health (SMD, 0.44; <i>p =</i> 0.001), bodily pain (SMD, -0.52; <i>p =</i> 0.004), general health (SMD, 0.43; <i>p =</i> 0.002), social functioning (SMD, 0.25; <i>p =</i> 0.006), and mental component score (SMD, 0.51; <i>p =</i> 0.001) subscales. Moreover, depression (SMD, -1.13; <i>p =</i> 0.01), upper-limb muscle strength (mean difference (MD), 15.26 kg; <i>p =</i> 0.002), lower-limb muscle strength (MD, 48.46 kg; <i>p =</i> 0.02), and handgrip muscle strength (MD, 1.35 kg; <i>p =</i> 0.003) significantly improved following resistance training. No benefits were found for vitality, physical component score, total score of quality of life, and the 6-min walk distance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preliminary evidence reveals that resistance training can be effective for improving most domains of quality of life, upper- and lower-limb muscle strength, handgrip strength, and depression in aged people. More proof is hence needed to draw solid conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8997,"journal":{"name":"Biological research for nursing","volume":"25 1","pages":"88-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Resistance Training on Quality of Life, Depression, Muscle Strength, and Functional Exercise Capacity in Older Adults Aged 60 Years or More.\",\"authors\":\"Sholeh Khodadad Kashi,&nbsp;Zahra Sadat Mirzazadeh,&nbsp;Vahid Saatchian\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10998004221120945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aging is generally associated with numerous metabolic and physical changes that augment susceptibility to several chronic conditions, disability, and diminished quality of life.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy of resistance training on quality of life, depression, muscle strength, and functional exercise capacity in older adults (≥60 years).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to December 20, 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>21 studies (<i>N</i> = 1610) were included. Resistance training significantly improved physical functioning (standard mean differences (SMD), 0.31; <i>p =</i> 0.02), mental health (SMD, 0.44; <i>p =</i> 0.001), bodily pain (SMD, -0.52; <i>p =</i> 0.004), general health (SMD, 0.43; <i>p =</i> 0.002), social functioning (SMD, 0.25; <i>p =</i> 0.006), and mental component score (SMD, 0.51; <i>p =</i> 0.001) subscales. Moreover, depression (SMD, -1.13; <i>p =</i> 0.01), upper-limb muscle strength (mean difference (MD), 15.26 kg; <i>p =</i> 0.002), lower-limb muscle strength (MD, 48.46 kg; <i>p =</i> 0.02), and handgrip muscle strength (MD, 1.35 kg; <i>p =</i> 0.003) significantly improved following resistance training. No benefits were found for vitality, physical component score, total score of quality of life, and the 6-min walk distance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preliminary evidence reveals that resistance training can be effective for improving most domains of quality of life, upper- and lower-limb muscle strength, handgrip strength, and depression in aged people. More proof is hence needed to draw solid conclusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological research for nursing\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"88-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological research for nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004221120945\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological research for nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004221120945","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

背景:衰老通常与许多代谢和身体变化有关,这些变化增加了对几种慢性疾病、残疾和生活质量下降的易感性。目的:本荟萃分析的目的是调查阻力训练对老年人(≥60岁)生活质量、抑郁、肌肉力量和功能运动能力的影响。数据来源:系统检索PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google Scholar和Scopus,截止到2021年12月20日。结果:共纳入21项研究(N = 1610)。抗阻训练显著改善身体机能(标准平均差异(SMD), 0.31;p = 0.02)、心理健康(SMD, 0.44;p = 0.001),身体疼痛(SMD, -0.52;p = 0.004),一般健康(SMD, 0.43;p = 0.002),社会功能(SMD, 0.25;p = 0.006),心理成分评分(SMD, 0.51;P = 0.001)。抑郁(SMD, -1.13;p = 0.01)、上肢肌力(MD)(平均差值15.26 kg;p = 0.002),下肢肌力(MD, 48.46 kg;p = 0.02),握力(MD, 1.35 kg;P = 0.003)阻力训练后显著改善。在活力、身体成分评分、生活质量总分和6分钟步行距离方面没有发现任何益处。结论:初步证据表明,阻力训练可以有效改善老年人的生活质量、上肢和下肢肌肉力量、握力和抑郁。因此,需要更多的证据来得出可靠的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Resistance Training on Quality of Life, Depression, Muscle Strength, and Functional Exercise Capacity in Older Adults Aged 60 Years or More.

Background: Aging is generally associated with numerous metabolic and physical changes that augment susceptibility to several chronic conditions, disability, and diminished quality of life.

Objective: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy of resistance training on quality of life, depression, muscle strength, and functional exercise capacity in older adults (≥60 years).

Data sources: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to December 20, 2021.

Results: 21 studies (N = 1610) were included. Resistance training significantly improved physical functioning (standard mean differences (SMD), 0.31; p = 0.02), mental health (SMD, 0.44; p = 0.001), bodily pain (SMD, -0.52; p = 0.004), general health (SMD, 0.43; p = 0.002), social functioning (SMD, 0.25; p = 0.006), and mental component score (SMD, 0.51; p = 0.001) subscales. Moreover, depression (SMD, -1.13; p = 0.01), upper-limb muscle strength (mean difference (MD), 15.26 kg; p = 0.002), lower-limb muscle strength (MD, 48.46 kg; p = 0.02), and handgrip muscle strength (MD, 1.35 kg; p = 0.003) significantly improved following resistance training. No benefits were found for vitality, physical component score, total score of quality of life, and the 6-min walk distance.

Conclusion: Preliminary evidence reveals that resistance training can be effective for improving most domains of quality of life, upper- and lower-limb muscle strength, handgrip strength, and depression in aged people. More proof is hence needed to draw solid conclusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Research For Nursing (BRN) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that helps nurse researchers, educators, and practitioners integrate information from many basic disciplines; biology, physiology, chemistry, health policy, business, engineering, education, communication and the social sciences into nursing research, theory and clinical practice. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信