直肠菌群中氟喹诺酮耐药大肠杆菌是经直肠超声引导前列腺活检后严重感染的主要危险因素:一项前瞻性观察研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Martin Holmbom, Jon Forsberg, Mats Fredrikson, Maud Nilsson, Lennart E Nilsson, Håkan Hanberger, Anita Hällgren
{"title":"直肠菌群中氟喹诺酮耐药大肠杆菌是经直肠超声引导前列腺活检后严重感染的主要危险因素:一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Martin Holmbom,&nbsp;Jon Forsberg,&nbsp;Mats Fredrikson,&nbsp;Maud Nilsson,&nbsp;Lennart E Nilsson,&nbsp;Håkan Hanberger,&nbsp;Anita Hällgren","doi":"10.2340/sju.v58.11920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infection of the prostate gland following biopsy, usually with Escherichia coli, is a common complication, despite the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis. A fluoroquinolone (FQ) is commonly prescribed as prophylaxis. Worryingly, the rate of fluoroquinolone-resistant (FQ-R) E. coli species has been shown to be increasing.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with infection after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective study on patients undergoing TRUS-Bx in southeast Sweden. Prebiopsy rectal and urine cultures were obtained, and antimicrobial susceptibility and risk-group stratification were determined. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for post-biopsy urinary tract infection (UTI) and FQ-R E. coli in the rectal flora.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 283 patients were included, of whom 18 (6.4%) developed post-TRUS-Bx UTIs. Of these, 10 (3.5%) had an UTI without systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and 8 (2.8%) had a UTI with SIRS. Being in the medium- or high-risk groups of infectious complications was not an independent risk factor for UTI with SIRS after TRUS-Bx, but low-level FQ-resistance (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC): 0.125-0.25 mg/L) or FQ-resistance (MIC > 0.5 mg/L) among E. coli in the faecal flora was. Risk for SIRS increased in parallel with increasing degrees of FQ-resistance. Significant risk factor for harbouring FQ-R E.coli was travelling outside Europe within the previous 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The predominant risk factor for UTI with SIRS after TRUS-Bx was FQ-R E. coli among the faecal flora. The difficulty in identifying this type of risk factor demonstrates a need for studies on the development of a general approach either with rectal swab culture for targeted prophylaxis, or prior rectal preparation with a bactericidal agent such as povidone-iodine before TRUS-Bx to reduce the risk of FQ-R E. coli-related infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":21542,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli among the rectal flora is the predominant risk factor for severe infection after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Holmbom,&nbsp;Jon Forsberg,&nbsp;Mats Fredrikson,&nbsp;Maud Nilsson,&nbsp;Lennart E Nilsson,&nbsp;Håkan Hanberger,&nbsp;Anita Hällgren\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/sju.v58.11920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infection of the prostate gland following biopsy, usually with Escherichia coli, is a common complication, despite the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis. A fluoroquinolone (FQ) is commonly prescribed as prophylaxis. Worryingly, the rate of fluoroquinolone-resistant (FQ-R) E. coli species has been shown to be increasing.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with infection after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective study on patients undergoing TRUS-Bx in southeast Sweden. Prebiopsy rectal and urine cultures were obtained, and antimicrobial susceptibility and risk-group stratification were determined. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for post-biopsy urinary tract infection (UTI) and FQ-R E. coli in the rectal flora.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 283 patients were included, of whom 18 (6.4%) developed post-TRUS-Bx UTIs. Of these, 10 (3.5%) had an UTI without systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and 8 (2.8%) had a UTI with SIRS. Being in the medium- or high-risk groups of infectious complications was not an independent risk factor for UTI with SIRS after TRUS-Bx, but low-level FQ-resistance (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC): 0.125-0.25 mg/L) or FQ-resistance (MIC > 0.5 mg/L) among E. coli in the faecal flora was. Risk for SIRS increased in parallel with increasing degrees of FQ-resistance. Significant risk factor for harbouring FQ-R E.coli was travelling outside Europe within the previous 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The predominant risk factor for UTI with SIRS after TRUS-Bx was FQ-R E. coli among the faecal flora. The difficulty in identifying this type of risk factor demonstrates a need for studies on the development of a general approach either with rectal swab culture for targeted prophylaxis, or prior rectal preparation with a bactericidal agent such as povidone-iodine before TRUS-Bx to reduce the risk of FQ-R E. coli-related infection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/sju.v58.11920\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/sju.v58.11920","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:活检后前列腺感染,通常伴有大肠杆菌,是一种常见的并发症,尽管使用了抗菌素预防。氟喹诺酮(FQ)通常作为预防处方。令人担忧的是,对氟喹诺酮类药物耐药(FQ-R)的大肠杆菌种类的比例已显示出正在增加。目的:本研究旨在确定经直肠超声引导前列腺活检(truss - bx)后感染的相关危险因素。方法:这是一项对瑞典东南部接受TRUS-Bx治疗的患者进行的前瞻性研究。活检前进行直肠和尿液培养,并确定抗菌素敏感性和风险组分层。进行多变量分析以确定活检后尿路感染(UTI)和直肠菌群中FQ-R大肠杆菌的独立危险因素。结果:共纳入283例患者,其中18例(6.4%)发生了trus - bx后尿路感染。其中,10例(3.5%)有无系统性炎症反应综合征(SIRS)的尿路感染,8例(2.8%)有伴系统性炎症反应综合征的尿路感染。感染并发症的中高危人群并不是TRUS-Bx后UTI合并SIRS的独立危险因素,但粪便菌群中大肠杆菌低水平的fq耐药(最低抑制浓度(MIC): 0.125-0.25 mg/L)或fq耐药(MIC > 0.5 mg/L)才是UTI合并SIRS的独立危险因素。SIRS的风险随着fq耐药程度的增加而增加。携带FQ-R型大肠杆菌的重要危险因素是在过去12个月内离开欧洲。结论:粪便菌群中FQ-R大肠杆菌是感染TRUS-Bx后UTI合并SIRS的主要危险因素。识别这类危险因素的困难表明,需要研究开发一种通用方法,要么通过直肠棉签培养进行有针对性的预防,要么在使用TRUS-Bx之前事先用消毒剂(如聚维酮碘)进行直肠准备,以降低FQ-R大肠杆菌相关感染的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli among the rectal flora is the predominant risk factor for severe infection after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective observational study.

Background: Infection of the prostate gland following biopsy, usually with Escherichia coli, is a common complication, despite the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis. A fluoroquinolone (FQ) is commonly prescribed as prophylaxis. Worryingly, the rate of fluoroquinolone-resistant (FQ-R) E. coli species has been shown to be increasing.

Objective: This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with infection after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx).

Methods: This was a prospective study on patients undergoing TRUS-Bx in southeast Sweden. Prebiopsy rectal and urine cultures were obtained, and antimicrobial susceptibility and risk-group stratification were determined. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for post-biopsy urinary tract infection (UTI) and FQ-R E. coli in the rectal flora.

Results: In all, 283 patients were included, of whom 18 (6.4%) developed post-TRUS-Bx UTIs. Of these, 10 (3.5%) had an UTI without systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and 8 (2.8%) had a UTI with SIRS. Being in the medium- or high-risk groups of infectious complications was not an independent risk factor for UTI with SIRS after TRUS-Bx, but low-level FQ-resistance (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC): 0.125-0.25 mg/L) or FQ-resistance (MIC > 0.5 mg/L) among E. coli in the faecal flora was. Risk for SIRS increased in parallel with increasing degrees of FQ-resistance. Significant risk factor for harbouring FQ-R E.coli was travelling outside Europe within the previous 12 months.

Conclusion: The predominant risk factor for UTI with SIRS after TRUS-Bx was FQ-R E. coli among the faecal flora. The difficulty in identifying this type of risk factor demonstrates a need for studies on the development of a general approach either with rectal swab culture for targeted prophylaxis, or prior rectal preparation with a bactericidal agent such as povidone-iodine before TRUS-Bx to reduce the risk of FQ-R E. coli-related infection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Urology
Scandinavian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Urology is a journal for the clinical urologist and publishes papers within all fields in clinical urology. Experimental papers related to clinical questions are also invited.Important reports with great news value are published promptly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信