铜绿假单胞菌感染伤口的光疗:抗菌蓝光(450-460 nm)的临床前评估,使用体外试验和人体伤口皮肤模型。

Marie-Charlotte D Leder, Mahsa Bagheri, Isabell Plattfaut, Paul C Fuchs, Anne K E Brüning, Jennifer L Schiefer, Christian Opländer
{"title":"铜绿假单胞菌感染伤口的光疗:抗菌蓝光(450-460 nm)的临床前评估,使用体外试验和人体伤口皮肤模型。","authors":"Marie-Charlotte D Leder,&nbsp;Mahsa Bagheri,&nbsp;Isabell Plattfaut,&nbsp;Paul C Fuchs,&nbsp;Anne K E Brüning,&nbsp;Jennifer L Schiefer,&nbsp;Christian Opländer","doi":"10.1089/photob.2022.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To determine effective treatment strategies against bacterial infections of burn wounds with <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, we tested different treatment regimens with antibacterial blue light (BL). <b><i>Background:</i></b> Infections of burn wounds are serious complications and require effective and pathogen-specific therapy. Hereby, infections caused by <i>P. aeruginosa</i> pose a particular challenge in clinical practice due to its resistance to many antibiotics and topical antiseptics. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> LED-based light sources (450-460 nm) with different intensities and treatment times were used. Antibacterial effects against <i>P. aeruginosa</i> were determined by colony-forming unit (CFU) assays, human skin wound models, and fluorescence imaging. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In suspension assays, BL (2 h, 40 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>, 288 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) reduced bacterial number (>5 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL). Applying 144 J/cm<sup>2</sup>, using 40 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> for 1 h was more effective (>4 log<sub>10</sub> CFU) than using 20 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> for 2 h (>1.5 log<sub>10</sub> CFU). BL with low irradiance (24 h, 3.5 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>, 300 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) only revealed bacterial reduction in thin bacteria-containing medium layers. In infected <i>in vitro</i> skin wounds only BL irradiation (2 h, 40 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>, 288 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) exerted a significant antimicrobial efficacy (2.94 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> BL treatment may be an effective therapy for <i>P. aeruginosa</i>-infected wounds to avoid radical surgical debridement. However, a significant antibacterial efficacy can only be achieved with higher irradiances and longer treatment times (min. 40 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>; >1 h), which cannot be easily integrated into regular clinical treatment protocols, for example, during a dressing change. Further studies are necessary to establish BL therapy for infected burns among tissue compatibility and interactions with previous therapeutic agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":20111,"journal":{"name":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","volume":"40 12","pages":"800-809"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phototherapy of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>-Infected Wounds: Preclinical Evaluation of Antimicrobial Blue Light (450-460 nm) Using <i>In Vitro</i> Assays and a Human Wound Skin Model.\",\"authors\":\"Marie-Charlotte D Leder,&nbsp;Mahsa Bagheri,&nbsp;Isabell Plattfaut,&nbsp;Paul C Fuchs,&nbsp;Anne K E Brüning,&nbsp;Jennifer L Schiefer,&nbsp;Christian Opländer\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/photob.2022.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To determine effective treatment strategies against bacterial infections of burn wounds with <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, we tested different treatment regimens with antibacterial blue light (BL). <b><i>Background:</i></b> Infections of burn wounds are serious complications and require effective and pathogen-specific therapy. Hereby, infections caused by <i>P. aeruginosa</i> pose a particular challenge in clinical practice due to its resistance to many antibiotics and topical antiseptics. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> LED-based light sources (450-460 nm) with different intensities and treatment times were used. Antibacterial effects against <i>P. aeruginosa</i> were determined by colony-forming unit (CFU) assays, human skin wound models, and fluorescence imaging. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In suspension assays, BL (2 h, 40 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>, 288 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) reduced bacterial number (>5 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL). Applying 144 J/cm<sup>2</sup>, using 40 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> for 1 h was more effective (>4 log<sub>10</sub> CFU) than using 20 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> for 2 h (>1.5 log<sub>10</sub> CFU). BL with low irradiance (24 h, 3.5 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>, 300 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) only revealed bacterial reduction in thin bacteria-containing medium layers. In infected <i>in vitro</i> skin wounds only BL irradiation (2 h, 40 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>, 288 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) exerted a significant antimicrobial efficacy (2.94 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> BL treatment may be an effective therapy for <i>P. aeruginosa</i>-infected wounds to avoid radical surgical debridement. However, a significant antibacterial efficacy can only be achieved with higher irradiances and longer treatment times (min. 40 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>; >1 h), which cannot be easily integrated into regular clinical treatment protocols, for example, during a dressing change. Further studies are necessary to establish BL therapy for infected burns among tissue compatibility and interactions with previous therapeutic agents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery\",\"volume\":\"40 12\",\"pages\":\"800-809\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2022.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2022.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:研究不同的抗菌蓝光治疗方案对铜绿假单胞菌烧伤创面细菌感染的有效治疗策略。背景:烧伤创面感染是严重的并发症,需要有效的病原体特异性治疗。因此,由铜绿假单胞菌引起的感染在临床实践中提出了一个特殊的挑战,因为它对许多抗生素和局部防腐剂具有耐药性。方法:采用不同强度、不同处理时间的led光源(450 ~ 460 nm)。通过菌落形成单位(CFU)测定、人体皮肤创面模型和荧光成像检测对铜绿假单胞菌的抗菌作用。结果:悬浮实验中,BL (2 h, 40 mW/cm2, 288 J/cm2)可减少细菌数量(>5 log10 CFU/mL)。使用144 J/cm2,使用40 mW/cm2 1小时比使用20 mW/cm2 2小时(>1.5 log10 CFU)更有效(>4 log10 CFU)。低辐照度(24 h, 3.5 mW/cm2, 300 J/cm2)的BL只显示含有细菌的薄介质层的细菌减少。在体外感染皮肤创面中,仅BL照射(2 h, 40 mW/cm2, 288 J/cm2)抗菌效果显著(2.94 log10 CFU/mL)。结论:BL治疗可能是铜绿假单胞菌感染的有效治疗方法,可避免根治性手术清创。然而,显著的抗菌效果只能在更高的辐照度和更长的处理时间(最小40 mW/cm2;>1小时),不容易整合到常规临床治疗方案中,例如在换药期间。在组织相容性和与先前治疗药物的相互作用中,需要进一步的研究来确定BL治疗感染烧伤的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phototherapy of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Infected Wounds: Preclinical Evaluation of Antimicrobial Blue Light (450-460 nm) Using In Vitro Assays and a Human Wound Skin Model.

Objective: To determine effective treatment strategies against bacterial infections of burn wounds with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, we tested different treatment regimens with antibacterial blue light (BL). Background: Infections of burn wounds are serious complications and require effective and pathogen-specific therapy. Hereby, infections caused by P. aeruginosa pose a particular challenge in clinical practice due to its resistance to many antibiotics and topical antiseptics. Methods: LED-based light sources (450-460 nm) with different intensities and treatment times were used. Antibacterial effects against P. aeruginosa were determined by colony-forming unit (CFU) assays, human skin wound models, and fluorescence imaging. Results: In suspension assays, BL (2 h, 40 mW/cm2, 288 J/cm2) reduced bacterial number (>5 log10 CFU/mL). Applying 144 J/cm2, using 40 mW/cm2 for 1 h was more effective (>4 log10 CFU) than using 20 mW/cm2 for 2 h (>1.5 log10 CFU). BL with low irradiance (24 h, 3.5 mW/cm2, 300 J/cm2) only revealed bacterial reduction in thin bacteria-containing medium layers. In infected in vitro skin wounds only BL irradiation (2 h, 40 mW/cm2, 288 J/cm2) exerted a significant antimicrobial efficacy (2.94 log10 CFU/mL). Conclusions: BL treatment may be an effective therapy for P. aeruginosa-infected wounds to avoid radical surgical debridement. However, a significant antibacterial efficacy can only be achieved with higher irradiances and longer treatment times (min. 40 mW/cm2; >1 h), which cannot be easily integrated into regular clinical treatment protocols, for example, during a dressing change. Further studies are necessary to establish BL therapy for infected burns among tissue compatibility and interactions with previous therapeutic agents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信