Marie-Charlotte D Leder, Mahsa Bagheri, Isabell Plattfaut, Paul C Fuchs, Anne K E Brüning, Jennifer L Schiefer, Christian Opländer
{"title":"铜绿假单胞菌感染伤口的光疗:抗菌蓝光(450-460 nm)的临床前评估,使用体外试验和人体伤口皮肤模型。","authors":"Marie-Charlotte D Leder, Mahsa Bagheri, Isabell Plattfaut, Paul C Fuchs, Anne K E Brüning, Jennifer L Schiefer, Christian Opländer","doi":"10.1089/photob.2022.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To determine effective treatment strategies against bacterial infections of burn wounds with <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, we tested different treatment regimens with antibacterial blue light (BL). <b><i>Background:</i></b> Infections of burn wounds are serious complications and require effective and pathogen-specific therapy. Hereby, infections caused by <i>P. aeruginosa</i> pose a particular challenge in clinical practice due to its resistance to many antibiotics and topical antiseptics. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> LED-based light sources (450-460 nm) with different intensities and treatment times were used. Antibacterial effects against <i>P. aeruginosa</i> were determined by colony-forming unit (CFU) assays, human skin wound models, and fluorescence imaging. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In suspension assays, BL (2 h, 40 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>, 288 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) reduced bacterial number (>5 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL). Applying 144 J/cm<sup>2</sup>, using 40 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> for 1 h was more effective (>4 log<sub>10</sub> CFU) than using 20 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> for 2 h (>1.5 log<sub>10</sub> CFU). BL with low irradiance (24 h, 3.5 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>, 300 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) only revealed bacterial reduction in thin bacteria-containing medium layers. In infected <i>in vitro</i> skin wounds only BL irradiation (2 h, 40 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>, 288 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) exerted a significant antimicrobial efficacy (2.94 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> BL treatment may be an effective therapy for <i>P. aeruginosa</i>-infected wounds to avoid radical surgical debridement. However, a significant antibacterial efficacy can only be achieved with higher irradiances and longer treatment times (min. 40 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>; >1 h), which cannot be easily integrated into regular clinical treatment protocols, for example, during a dressing change. Further studies are necessary to establish BL therapy for infected burns among tissue compatibility and interactions with previous therapeutic agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":20111,"journal":{"name":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","volume":"40 12","pages":"800-809"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phototherapy of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>-Infected Wounds: Preclinical Evaluation of Antimicrobial Blue Light (450-460 nm) Using <i>In Vitro</i> Assays and a Human Wound Skin Model.\",\"authors\":\"Marie-Charlotte D Leder, Mahsa Bagheri, Isabell Plattfaut, Paul C Fuchs, Anne K E Brüning, Jennifer L Schiefer, Christian Opländer\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/photob.2022.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To determine effective treatment strategies against bacterial infections of burn wounds with <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, we tested different treatment regimens with antibacterial blue light (BL). <b><i>Background:</i></b> Infections of burn wounds are serious complications and require effective and pathogen-specific therapy. Hereby, infections caused by <i>P. aeruginosa</i> pose a particular challenge in clinical practice due to its resistance to many antibiotics and topical antiseptics. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> LED-based light sources (450-460 nm) with different intensities and treatment times were used. Antibacterial effects against <i>P. aeruginosa</i> were determined by colony-forming unit (CFU) assays, human skin wound models, and fluorescence imaging. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In suspension assays, BL (2 h, 40 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>, 288 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) reduced bacterial number (>5 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL). Applying 144 J/cm<sup>2</sup>, using 40 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> for 1 h was more effective (>4 log<sub>10</sub> CFU) than using 20 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> for 2 h (>1.5 log<sub>10</sub> CFU). BL with low irradiance (24 h, 3.5 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>, 300 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) only revealed bacterial reduction in thin bacteria-containing medium layers. In infected <i>in vitro</i> skin wounds only BL irradiation (2 h, 40 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>, 288 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) exerted a significant antimicrobial efficacy (2.94 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> BL treatment may be an effective therapy for <i>P. aeruginosa</i>-infected wounds to avoid radical surgical debridement. However, a significant antibacterial efficacy can only be achieved with higher irradiances and longer treatment times (min. 40 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>; >1 h), which cannot be easily integrated into regular clinical treatment protocols, for example, during a dressing change. Further studies are necessary to establish BL therapy for infected burns among tissue compatibility and interactions with previous therapeutic agents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery\",\"volume\":\"40 12\",\"pages\":\"800-809\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2022.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2022.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Phototherapy of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Infected Wounds: Preclinical Evaluation of Antimicrobial Blue Light (450-460 nm) Using In Vitro Assays and a Human Wound Skin Model.
Objective: To determine effective treatment strategies against bacterial infections of burn wounds with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, we tested different treatment regimens with antibacterial blue light (BL). Background: Infections of burn wounds are serious complications and require effective and pathogen-specific therapy. Hereby, infections caused by P. aeruginosa pose a particular challenge in clinical practice due to its resistance to many antibiotics and topical antiseptics. Methods: LED-based light sources (450-460 nm) with different intensities and treatment times were used. Antibacterial effects against P. aeruginosa were determined by colony-forming unit (CFU) assays, human skin wound models, and fluorescence imaging. Results: In suspension assays, BL (2 h, 40 mW/cm2, 288 J/cm2) reduced bacterial number (>5 log10 CFU/mL). Applying 144 J/cm2, using 40 mW/cm2 for 1 h was more effective (>4 log10 CFU) than using 20 mW/cm2 for 2 h (>1.5 log10 CFU). BL with low irradiance (24 h, 3.5 mW/cm2, 300 J/cm2) only revealed bacterial reduction in thin bacteria-containing medium layers. In infected in vitro skin wounds only BL irradiation (2 h, 40 mW/cm2, 288 J/cm2) exerted a significant antimicrobial efficacy (2.94 log10 CFU/mL). Conclusions: BL treatment may be an effective therapy for P. aeruginosa-infected wounds to avoid radical surgical debridement. However, a significant antibacterial efficacy can only be achieved with higher irradiances and longer treatment times (min. 40 mW/cm2; >1 h), which cannot be easily integrated into regular clinical treatment protocols, for example, during a dressing change. Further studies are necessary to establish BL therapy for infected burns among tissue compatibility and interactions with previous therapeutic agents.