{"title":"股腘血管成形术的血管造影和超声比较:决策和12个月的结果。","authors":"Yuchi Zou, Qiang Tong, Xuehu Wang, Chuli Jiang, Zheng Qin, Yu Zhao, Jun Cheng","doi":"10.23736/S0392-9590.23.05064-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) combined with angiography during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty impacts treatment strategies and the 12-month patency of the femoropopliteal artery, compared to angiography alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center study enrolled 137 patients who underwent a femoropopliteal endovascular intervention between February 2020 and May 2021. Among these interventions, 43 were guided by IVUS combined with angiography and the remaining 94 were guided by angiography only. Treatment strategies and 12-month patency were analyzed in both groups. Multivariable analysis was performed to clarify the predictors of restenosis within 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary patency at 12 months was significantly higher in the IVUS group than in the angiography group (56.4% vs. 76.7%, P=0.047). The reference diameter on IVUS images was greater than that on angiography images. Therefore, the IVUS group presented a higher balloon-to-vessel ratio [1.0 (0.97, 1.01) vs. 1.06 (1.0.1.25)]. More adjunctive stents were required in the angiography group. However, more dissections were performed in the IVUS group, with no difference in flow-limiting dissections between groups. Target disease length (odds ratio 1.02, P=0.021) and balloon-to-vessel ratio (odds ratio 0.01, P=0.021) were independent predictors of restenosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with angiography guidance alone, IVUS guidance for femoropopliteal artery-related treatment can significantly increase primary patency. This finding may be explained by the selection of larger balloons in IVUS and the resulting sufficient plaque compression and elastic membrane stretch. Moreover, IVUS was shown to detect more non-flow-limiting dissections than angiography.</p>","PeriodicalId":13709,"journal":{"name":"International Angiology","volume":"42 4","pages":"327-336"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of angiography and ultrasound for femoropopliteal angioplasty: decision-making and 12-month outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Yuchi Zou, Qiang Tong, Xuehu Wang, Chuli Jiang, Zheng Qin, Yu Zhao, Jun Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0392-9590.23.05064-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) combined with angiography during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty impacts treatment strategies and the 12-month patency of the femoropopliteal artery, compared to angiography alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center study enrolled 137 patients who underwent a femoropopliteal endovascular intervention between February 2020 and May 2021. Among these interventions, 43 were guided by IVUS combined with angiography and the remaining 94 were guided by angiography only. Treatment strategies and 12-month patency were analyzed in both groups. Multivariable analysis was performed to clarify the predictors of restenosis within 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary patency at 12 months was significantly higher in the IVUS group than in the angiography group (56.4% vs. 76.7%, P=0.047). The reference diameter on IVUS images was greater than that on angiography images. Therefore, the IVUS group presented a higher balloon-to-vessel ratio [1.0 (0.97, 1.01) vs. 1.06 (1.0.1.25)]. More adjunctive stents were required in the angiography group. However, more dissections were performed in the IVUS group, with no difference in flow-limiting dissections between groups. Target disease length (odds ratio 1.02, P=0.021) and balloon-to-vessel ratio (odds ratio 0.01, P=0.021) were independent predictors of restenosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with angiography guidance alone, IVUS guidance for femoropopliteal artery-related treatment can significantly increase primary patency. This finding may be explained by the selection of larger balloons in IVUS and the resulting sufficient plaque compression and elastic membrane stretch. Moreover, IVUS was shown to detect more non-flow-limiting dissections than angiography.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Angiology\",\"volume\":\"42 4\",\"pages\":\"327-336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Angiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.23.05064-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.23.05064-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究旨在探讨经皮腔内血管成形术中血管内超声(IVUS)联合血管造影与单独血管造影相比,是否会影响治疗策略和股腘动脉12个月的通畅程度。方法:这项回顾性的单中心研究纳入了137名在2020年2月至2021年5月期间接受股腘动脉内介入治疗的患者。其中IVUS联合血管造影43例,单纯血管造影94例。分析两组患者的治疗策略及12个月的通畅程度。进行多变量分析以明确12个月内再狭窄的预测因素。结果:IVUS组12个月原发性通畅率明显高于血管造影组(56.4% vs. 76.7%, P=0.047)。IVUS图像的参考直径大于血管造影图像的参考直径。因此,IVUS组球囊与血管的比值更高[1.0 (0.97,1.01)vs. 1.06(1.0.1.25)]。血管造影组需要更多的辅助支架。然而,IVUS组进行了更多的解剖,两组之间的限流解剖没有差异。靶病变长度(优势比1.02,P=0.021)和球囊与血管比(优势比0.01,P=0.021)是再狭窄的独立预测因子。结论:与单纯血管造影指导相比,IVUS指导股腘动脉相关治疗可显著提高原发性通畅。这一发现可能是由于在IVUS中选择了更大的球囊,从而产生了足够的斑块压缩和弹性膜拉伸。此外,与血管造影相比,IVUS显示出更多的非血流受限夹层。
Comparison of angiography and ultrasound for femoropopliteal angioplasty: decision-making and 12-month outcomes.
Background: This study aimed to investigate whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) combined with angiography during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty impacts treatment strategies and the 12-month patency of the femoropopliteal artery, compared to angiography alone.
Methods: This retrospective, single-center study enrolled 137 patients who underwent a femoropopliteal endovascular intervention between February 2020 and May 2021. Among these interventions, 43 were guided by IVUS combined with angiography and the remaining 94 were guided by angiography only. Treatment strategies and 12-month patency were analyzed in both groups. Multivariable analysis was performed to clarify the predictors of restenosis within 12 months.
Results: Primary patency at 12 months was significantly higher in the IVUS group than in the angiography group (56.4% vs. 76.7%, P=0.047). The reference diameter on IVUS images was greater than that on angiography images. Therefore, the IVUS group presented a higher balloon-to-vessel ratio [1.0 (0.97, 1.01) vs. 1.06 (1.0.1.25)]. More adjunctive stents were required in the angiography group. However, more dissections were performed in the IVUS group, with no difference in flow-limiting dissections between groups. Target disease length (odds ratio 1.02, P=0.021) and balloon-to-vessel ratio (odds ratio 0.01, P=0.021) were independent predictors of restenosis.
Conclusions: Compared with angiography guidance alone, IVUS guidance for femoropopliteal artery-related treatment can significantly increase primary patency. This finding may be explained by the selection of larger balloons in IVUS and the resulting sufficient plaque compression and elastic membrane stretch. Moreover, IVUS was shown to detect more non-flow-limiting dissections than angiography.
期刊介绍:
International Angiology publishes scientific papers on angiology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).