Alysha Dhami, S Max Vale, Michael L Richardson, April K Schachtel, Philip Fleckman
{"title":"比较超声与磁共振成像在评估舌下结节瘤和舌下肌样囊肿中的应用","authors":"Alysha Dhami, S Max Vale, Michael L Richardson, April K Schachtel, Philip Fleckman","doi":"10.1159/000530397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Subungual myxoid cysts and subungual glomus tumors demonstrate characteristic features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US). It is not yet well-established whether US is congruent to MRI in diagnostic evaluation of these subungual lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with clinical suspicion for subungual glomus tumors or subungual myxoid cysts were recruited. After clinical evaluation, participants underwent radiography, MRI, and US plus biopsy, aspiration, or excision where possible. Differential diagnoses were revised after review of imaging, and imaging findings were compared to definitive diagnosis by pathology, aspiration, or clinical course.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All lesions were visible on both US and MRI and size estimates agreed between the two modalities. US and MRI findings of subungual glomus tumors and subungual myxoid cysts agreed with their known respective imaging characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diagnosis of subungual myxoid cysts and subungual glomus tumors agreed between US and MRI. We provide sample MRI and US imaging parameters for optimal evaluation of subungual myxoid cysts and glomus tumors. We demonstrate that subungual MRI evaluation can be performed without special equipment, allowing for evaluation by most radiology departments. Lastly, US is user-dependent and may be non-inferior for a sonographer familiar with subungual US.</p>","PeriodicalId":21844,"journal":{"name":"Skin Appendage Disorders","volume":"9 4","pages":"262-267"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10410070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Ultrasound with Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Subungual Glomus Tumors and Subungual Myxoid Cysts.\",\"authors\":\"Alysha Dhami, S Max Vale, Michael L Richardson, April K Schachtel, Philip Fleckman\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000530397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Subungual myxoid cysts and subungual glomus tumors demonstrate characteristic features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US). It is not yet well-established whether US is congruent to MRI in diagnostic evaluation of these subungual lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with clinical suspicion for subungual glomus tumors or subungual myxoid cysts were recruited. After clinical evaluation, participants underwent radiography, MRI, and US plus biopsy, aspiration, or excision where possible. Differential diagnoses were revised after review of imaging, and imaging findings were compared to definitive diagnosis by pathology, aspiration, or clinical course.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All lesions were visible on both US and MRI and size estimates agreed between the two modalities. US and MRI findings of subungual glomus tumors and subungual myxoid cysts agreed with their known respective imaging characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diagnosis of subungual myxoid cysts and subungual glomus tumors agreed between US and MRI. We provide sample MRI and US imaging parameters for optimal evaluation of subungual myxoid cysts and glomus tumors. We demonstrate that subungual MRI evaluation can be performed without special equipment, allowing for evaluation by most radiology departments. Lastly, US is user-dependent and may be non-inferior for a sonographer familiar with subungual US.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Skin Appendage Disorders\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"262-267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10410070/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Skin Appendage Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin Appendage Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:在磁共振成像(MRI)和超声波(US)检查中,舌下肌样囊肿和舌下腺瘤具有特征性。在诊断评估这些真皮下病变时,超声检查是否与核磁共振成像一致尚未得到充分证实:方法:招募临床怀疑为真皮下神经胶质瘤或真皮下肌样囊肿的参与者。经过临床评估后,参与者接受了放射线检查、核磁共振成像和超声波检查,并在可能的情况下进行了活检、抽吸或切除术。影像学检查后对鉴别诊断进行修订,并将影像学检查结果与病理学、抽吸或临床病程的明确诊断进行比较:结果:所有病变在 US 和 MRI 上均可见,两种成像方式对病变大小的估计一致。真皮下胶质瘤和真皮下肌样囊肿的 US 和 MRI 检查结果与已知的各自影像学特征一致:结论:US 和 MRI 对舌下肌样囊肿和舌下神经胶质瘤的诊断结果一致。我们提供了核磁共振成像和超声成像参数样本,以便对舌下肌样囊肿和舌下胶样瘤进行最佳评估。我们证明,无需特殊设备即可进行舌下核磁共振成像评估,大多数放射科都可以进行评估。最后,对于熟悉舌下 US 的超声技师来说,US 是依赖于用户的,可能并不优于 MRI。
Comparing Ultrasound with Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Subungual Glomus Tumors and Subungual Myxoid Cysts.
Introduction: Subungual myxoid cysts and subungual glomus tumors demonstrate characteristic features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US). It is not yet well-established whether US is congruent to MRI in diagnostic evaluation of these subungual lesions.
Methods: Participants with clinical suspicion for subungual glomus tumors or subungual myxoid cysts were recruited. After clinical evaluation, participants underwent radiography, MRI, and US plus biopsy, aspiration, or excision where possible. Differential diagnoses were revised after review of imaging, and imaging findings were compared to definitive diagnosis by pathology, aspiration, or clinical course.
Results: All lesions were visible on both US and MRI and size estimates agreed between the two modalities. US and MRI findings of subungual glomus tumors and subungual myxoid cysts agreed with their known respective imaging characteristics.
Conclusions: Diagnosis of subungual myxoid cysts and subungual glomus tumors agreed between US and MRI. We provide sample MRI and US imaging parameters for optimal evaluation of subungual myxoid cysts and glomus tumors. We demonstrate that subungual MRI evaluation can be performed without special equipment, allowing for evaluation by most radiology departments. Lastly, US is user-dependent and may be non-inferior for a sonographer familiar with subungual US.