CytoSorb®对败血症患者的细胞因子血液吸附:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

Jiovany Jhan Carlos Saldaña-Gastulo, María Del Rosario Llamas-Barbarán, Lelis G Coronel-Chucos, Yamilée Hurtado-Roca
{"title":"CytoSorb®对败血症患者的细胞因子血液吸附:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Jiovany Jhan Carlos Saldaña-Gastulo, María Del Rosario Llamas-Barbarán, Lelis G Coronel-Chucos, Yamilée Hurtado-Roca","doi":"10.5935/2965-2774.20230289-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To analyze the effect of CytoSorb® on mortality, interleukin levels, vasopressor use and adverse events in patients with sepsis. Methods We searched MEDLINE®, Embase and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that reported the use of CytoSorb® among septic patients. The primary outcome was mortality, and secondary outcomes included the use of vasopressors, levels of inflammatory markers, predicted versus observed mortality, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and adverse events. Results We included 6 studies enrolling 413 patients, and assessment for risk of bias indicated variations in study quality from high to moderate. The overall mortality rate was 45%, and no significant effect on mortality was found at 28 - 30 days (RR 0.98 [0.12 - 8.25] for the randomized clinical trial and RR 0.74 [0.49 - 1.13] for cohort studies). We did not perform a metanalysis for other outcomes due to the small number of studies found or the lack of data. Conclusion Our study found very low certainty evidence, due to imprecision, risk of bias, and heterogeneity, thereby showing no benefit of CytoSorb® use in terms of mortality at 28 - 30 days. We cannot recommend the use of CytoSorb® in septic or septic shock patients outside clinical trials. Further high-quality randomized trials with a common intervention arm are needed to evaluate the influence of CytoSorb® in this population. PROSPERO register CRD42021262219","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10406402/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cytokine hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jiovany Jhan Carlos Saldaña-Gastulo, María Del Rosario Llamas-Barbarán, Lelis G Coronel-Chucos, Yamilée Hurtado-Roca\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/2965-2774.20230289-en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective To analyze the effect of CytoSorb® on mortality, interleukin levels, vasopressor use and adverse events in patients with sepsis. Methods We searched MEDLINE®, Embase and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that reported the use of CytoSorb® among septic patients. The primary outcome was mortality, and secondary outcomes included the use of vasopressors, levels of inflammatory markers, predicted versus observed mortality, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and adverse events. Results We included 6 studies enrolling 413 patients, and assessment for risk of bias indicated variations in study quality from high to moderate. The overall mortality rate was 45%, and no significant effect on mortality was found at 28 - 30 days (RR 0.98 [0.12 - 8.25] for the randomized clinical trial and RR 0.74 [0.49 - 1.13] for cohort studies). We did not perform a metanalysis for other outcomes due to the small number of studies found or the lack of data. Conclusion Our study found very low certainty evidence, due to imprecision, risk of bias, and heterogeneity, thereby showing no benefit of CytoSorb® use in terms of mortality at 28 - 30 days. We cannot recommend the use of CytoSorb® in septic or septic shock patients outside clinical trials. Further high-quality randomized trials with a common intervention arm are needed to evaluate the influence of CytoSorb® in this population. PROSPERO register CRD42021262219\",\"PeriodicalId\":72721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10406402/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/2965-2774.20230289-en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2965-2774.20230289-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:分析CytoSorb®对败血症患者死亡率、白细胞介素水平、血管升压药使用和不良事件的影响。方法:我们在MEDLINE®、Embase和Cochrane图书馆中搜索了随机对照试验和队列研究,这些试验和研究报告了CytoSorb®在脓毒症患者中的使用情况。主要结果是死亡率,次要结果包括血管升压药的使用、炎症标志物的水平、预测与观察到的死亡率、重症监护室的住院时间和不良事件。结果:我们纳入了6项研究,共招募了413名患者,偏倚风险评估显示研究质量从高到中等不等。总死亡率为45%,在28-30天时未发现对死亡率的显著影响(随机临床试验的RR为0.98[0.12-8.25],队列研究的RR为0.74[0.49-1.13])。由于发现的研究数量较少或缺乏数据,我们没有对其他结果进行荟萃分析。结论:由于不精确性、偏倚风险和异质性,我们的研究发现了非常低的确定性证据,从而表明使用CytoSorb®对28-30天的死亡率没有任何益处。我们不建议在临床试验以外的感染性或感染性休克患者中使用CytoSorb®。需要使用普通干预组进行进一步的高质量随机试验,以评估CytoSorb®在该人群中的影响。Prospero注册号:CRD42021262219。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cytokine hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cytokine hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cytokine hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cytokine hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Objective To analyze the effect of CytoSorb® on mortality, interleukin levels, vasopressor use and adverse events in patients with sepsis. Methods We searched MEDLINE®, Embase and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that reported the use of CytoSorb® among septic patients. The primary outcome was mortality, and secondary outcomes included the use of vasopressors, levels of inflammatory markers, predicted versus observed mortality, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and adverse events. Results We included 6 studies enrolling 413 patients, and assessment for risk of bias indicated variations in study quality from high to moderate. The overall mortality rate was 45%, and no significant effect on mortality was found at 28 - 30 days (RR 0.98 [0.12 - 8.25] for the randomized clinical trial and RR 0.74 [0.49 - 1.13] for cohort studies). We did not perform a metanalysis for other outcomes due to the small number of studies found or the lack of data. Conclusion Our study found very low certainty evidence, due to imprecision, risk of bias, and heterogeneity, thereby showing no benefit of CytoSorb® use in terms of mortality at 28 - 30 days. We cannot recommend the use of CytoSorb® in septic or septic shock patients outside clinical trials. Further high-quality randomized trials with a common intervention arm are needed to evaluate the influence of CytoSorb® in this population. PROSPERO register CRD42021262219
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信