选择性去除软牙本质与全髓切开术治疗近端深部龋齿病变:一项随机对照非劣效性试验。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Caries Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-08 DOI:10.1159/000530895
Rechithra R, Wasim Wani, Sidhartha Sharma, Vijay Kumar, Amrita Chawla, Mani Kalaivani, Ajay Logani
{"title":"选择性去除软牙本质与全髓切开术治疗近端深部龋齿病变:一项随机对照非劣效性试验。","authors":"Rechithra R, Wasim Wani, Sidhartha Sharma, Vijay Kumar, Amrita Chawla, Mani Kalaivani, Ajay Logani","doi":"10.1159/000530895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The management of the deep carious lesion with reversible pulpitis is a dilemma for the dentist. The current study compared selective removal to soft dentine (SRSD) and full pulpotomy (FP) for treating proximal deep carious lesions in teeth with reversible pulpitis. Visual-tactile examination and bitewing radiographs were used to determine the depth of carious lesion, and American Association of Endodontists recommendations were used to formulate pulp diagnosis. Sixty mandibular molar teeth from healthy patients between the ages of 16-35 years and a diagnosis of proximal deep carious lesion with reversible pulpitis were included. Teeth were randomly allocated to two study groups. SRSD group (n = 30): soft dentine was preserved over the pulpal aspect. A hard-setting calcium hydroxide cement liner and resin-modified glass ionomer cement base were applied over the remaining soft carious dentine. FP group (n = 30): complete caries removal followed by mineral trioxide aggregate FP was performed. The teeth in both groups were restored with composite resin restoration. The established criteria for outcome assessment of SRSD and pulpotomy were used. Accordingly, only asymptomatic teeth with no radiological evidence of periapical rarefaction were considered successful at the 12-month follow-up. Two-sample t test, Pearson χ2 test/Fisher's exact test, and percentage agreement were used for statistical evaluation. According to the per-protocol analysis, the success rate of both SRSD and FP treatment was 95.45% and 95.65%, respectively, and the actual difference between the two treatments was 1% (95% CI: [-10, 9]). The data suggests that both treatments (SRSD and FP) appear to have a good success rate (&gt;95%) when used to manage permanent mandibular molar teeth with proximal deep carious lesion and reversible pulpitis. As SRSD is a noninvasive procedure, it should be favored over FP in these instances.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"536-545"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selective Removal to Soft Dentine versus Full Pulpotomy for Management of Proximal Deep Carious Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Rechithra R, Wasim Wani, Sidhartha Sharma, Vijay Kumar, Amrita Chawla, Mani Kalaivani, Ajay Logani\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000530895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The management of the deep carious lesion with reversible pulpitis is a dilemma for the dentist. The current study compared selective removal to soft dentine (SRSD) and full pulpotomy (FP) for treating proximal deep carious lesions in teeth with reversible pulpitis. Visual-tactile examination and bitewing radiographs were used to determine the depth of carious lesion, and American Association of Endodontists recommendations were used to formulate pulp diagnosis. Sixty mandibular molar teeth from healthy patients between the ages of 16-35 years and a diagnosis of proximal deep carious lesion with reversible pulpitis were included. Teeth were randomly allocated to two study groups. SRSD group (n = 30): soft dentine was preserved over the pulpal aspect. A hard-setting calcium hydroxide cement liner and resin-modified glass ionomer cement base were applied over the remaining soft carious dentine. FP group (n = 30): complete caries removal followed by mineral trioxide aggregate FP was performed. The teeth in both groups were restored with composite resin restoration. The established criteria for outcome assessment of SRSD and pulpotomy were used. Accordingly, only asymptomatic teeth with no radiological evidence of periapical rarefaction were considered successful at the 12-month follow-up. Two-sample t test, Pearson χ2 test/Fisher's exact test, and percentage agreement were used for statistical evaluation. According to the per-protocol analysis, the success rate of both SRSD and FP treatment was 95.45% and 95.65%, respectively, and the actual difference between the two treatments was 1% (95% CI: [-10, 9]). The data suggests that both treatments (SRSD and FP) appear to have a good success rate (&gt;95%) when used to manage permanent mandibular molar teeth with proximal deep carious lesion and reversible pulpitis. As SRSD is a noninvasive procedure, it should be favored over FP in these instances.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Caries Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"536-545\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Caries Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530895\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caries Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530895","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

深龋病变与可逆性牙髓炎的管理是一个两难的牙医。本研究比较了选择性去除软牙本质(SRSD)和全髓切开术(FP)治疗牙齿近端深部龋病伴可逆性牙髓炎的效果。使用视觉触觉检查和咬颌x线片来确定龋病的深度,并使用美国牙髓医师协会的建议来制定牙髓诊断。我们收集了年龄在16-35岁之间的健康患者的60颗下颌磨牙,并诊断为近端深部龋齿病变伴可逆性牙髓炎。牙齿被随机分配到两个研究组。SRSD组(n = 30):保留牙髓侧软牙本质。采用硬固型氢氧化钙水泥衬垫和树脂改性玻璃离子水泥基对剩余的软牙本质进行修复。FP组(n = 30):全龋清除后进行矿物三氧化物骨料FP。两组均采用复合树脂修复。采用既定的SRSD和髓质切开术结局评估标准。因此,在12个月的随访中,只有无根尖周稀疏的无症状牙齿被认为是成功的。采用双样本t检验、Pearson χ2检验/Fisher确切检验和百分比一致性进行统计评价。根据方案分析,SRSD和FP治疗的成功率分别为95.45%和95.65%,两种治疗的实际差异为1% (95% CI:[- 10,9])。数据表明,两种治疗方法(SRSD和FP)在治疗近端深部龋病和可逆性牙髓炎的下颌恒磨牙时似乎都有很好的成功率(95%)。由于SRSD是一种非侵入性手术,在这些情况下,它应该比FP更受欢迎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selective Removal to Soft Dentine versus Full Pulpotomy for Management of Proximal Deep Carious Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial.

The management of the deep carious lesion with reversible pulpitis is a dilemma for the dentist. The current study compared selective removal to soft dentine (SRSD) and full pulpotomy (FP) for treating proximal deep carious lesions in teeth with reversible pulpitis. Visual-tactile examination and bitewing radiographs were used to determine the depth of carious lesion, and American Association of Endodontists recommendations were used to formulate pulp diagnosis. Sixty mandibular molar teeth from healthy patients between the ages of 16-35 years and a diagnosis of proximal deep carious lesion with reversible pulpitis were included. Teeth were randomly allocated to two study groups. SRSD group (n = 30): soft dentine was preserved over the pulpal aspect. A hard-setting calcium hydroxide cement liner and resin-modified glass ionomer cement base were applied over the remaining soft carious dentine. FP group (n = 30): complete caries removal followed by mineral trioxide aggregate FP was performed. The teeth in both groups were restored with composite resin restoration. The established criteria for outcome assessment of SRSD and pulpotomy were used. Accordingly, only asymptomatic teeth with no radiological evidence of periapical rarefaction were considered successful at the 12-month follow-up. Two-sample t test, Pearson χ2 test/Fisher's exact test, and percentage agreement were used for statistical evaluation. According to the per-protocol analysis, the success rate of both SRSD and FP treatment was 95.45% and 95.65%, respectively, and the actual difference between the two treatments was 1% (95% CI: [-10, 9]). The data suggests that both treatments (SRSD and FP) appear to have a good success rate (>95%) when used to manage permanent mandibular molar teeth with proximal deep carious lesion and reversible pulpitis. As SRSD is a noninvasive procedure, it should be favored over FP in these instances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Caries Research
Caries Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Caries Research'' publishes epidemiological, clinical and laboratory studies in dental caries, erosion and related dental diseases. Some studies build on the considerable advances already made in caries prevention, e.g. through fluoride application. Some aim to improve understanding of the increasingly important problem of dental erosion and the associated tooth wear process. Others monitor the changing pattern of caries in different populations, explore improved methods of diagnosis or evaluate methods of prevention or treatment. The broad coverage of current research has given the journal an international reputation as an indispensable source for both basic scientists and clinicians engaged in understanding, investigating and preventing dental disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信