初步临床试验,为家庭重症监护疼痛观察工具(CPOT-Fam)的发展提供信息。

IF 2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anmol Shahid, Bonnie G Sept, Victoria S Owen, Corson Johnstone, Rameiya Paramalingam, Stephana J Moss, Rebecca Brundin-Mather, Karla D Krewulak, Andrea Soo, Jeanna Parsons-Leigh, Céline Gélinas, Kirsten M Fiest, Henry T Stelfox
{"title":"初步临床试验,为家庭重症监护疼痛观察工具(CPOT-Fam)的发展提供信息。","authors":"Anmol Shahid,&nbsp;Bonnie G Sept,&nbsp;Victoria S Owen,&nbsp;Corson Johnstone,&nbsp;Rameiya Paramalingam,&nbsp;Stephana J Moss,&nbsp;Rebecca Brundin-Mather,&nbsp;Karla D Krewulak,&nbsp;Andrea Soo,&nbsp;Jeanna Parsons-Leigh,&nbsp;Céline Gélinas,&nbsp;Kirsten M Fiest,&nbsp;Henry T Stelfox","doi":"10.1080/24740527.2023.2235399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) cannot communicate. For these patients, family caregivers (family members/close friends) could assist in pain assessment. We previously adapted the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) for family caregiver use (CPOT-Fam). In this study, we conducted preliminary clinical evaluation of the CPOT-Fam to inform further tool development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For preliminary testing, we collected (1) pain assessments of patients in the ICU from family caregivers (CPOT-Fam) and nurses (CPOT) and determined the degree of agreement (kappa coefficient, κ) and (2) collected openended feedback on the CPOT-Fam from family caregivers. For refinement, we used preliminary testing data to refine the CPOT-Fam with a multidisciplinary working group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We assessed agreement between family caregiver and nurse pain scores for 29 patients. Binary agreement (κ) between CPOT-Fam and CPOT item scores (scores ≥2 considered indicative of significant pain) was fair, κ = 0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-0.69). Agreement was highest for the CPOT-Fam items ventilator compliance/vocalization (weighted κ = 0.48, 95% CI 0.15-0.80) and lowest for muscle tension (weighted κ = 0.10, 95% [CI] -0.17 to 0.20). Most participants (<i>n</i> = 19; 69.0%) reported a very positive experience using the CPOT-Fam, describing it as \"good\" and \"easy-to-use/clear/straightforward.\" We iteratively refined the CPOT-Fam over five cycles using the data collected until no further revisions were suggested.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our preliminary clinical testing suggests that family involvement in pain assessment in the ICU is well perceived. The CPOT-Fam has been further refined and is now ready for clinical pilot testing to determine its feasibility and acceptability.</p>","PeriodicalId":53214,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","volume":"7 2","pages":"2235399"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503446/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary clinical testing to inform development of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool for Families (CPOT-Fam).\",\"authors\":\"Anmol Shahid,&nbsp;Bonnie G Sept,&nbsp;Victoria S Owen,&nbsp;Corson Johnstone,&nbsp;Rameiya Paramalingam,&nbsp;Stephana J Moss,&nbsp;Rebecca Brundin-Mather,&nbsp;Karla D Krewulak,&nbsp;Andrea Soo,&nbsp;Jeanna Parsons-Leigh,&nbsp;Céline Gélinas,&nbsp;Kirsten M Fiest,&nbsp;Henry T Stelfox\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24740527.2023.2235399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) cannot communicate. For these patients, family caregivers (family members/close friends) could assist in pain assessment. We previously adapted the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) for family caregiver use (CPOT-Fam). In this study, we conducted preliminary clinical evaluation of the CPOT-Fam to inform further tool development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For preliminary testing, we collected (1) pain assessments of patients in the ICU from family caregivers (CPOT-Fam) and nurses (CPOT) and determined the degree of agreement (kappa coefficient, κ) and (2) collected openended feedback on the CPOT-Fam from family caregivers. For refinement, we used preliminary testing data to refine the CPOT-Fam with a multidisciplinary working group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We assessed agreement between family caregiver and nurse pain scores for 29 patients. Binary agreement (κ) between CPOT-Fam and CPOT item scores (scores ≥2 considered indicative of significant pain) was fair, κ = 0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-0.69). Agreement was highest for the CPOT-Fam items ventilator compliance/vocalization (weighted κ = 0.48, 95% CI 0.15-0.80) and lowest for muscle tension (weighted κ = 0.10, 95% [CI] -0.17 to 0.20). Most participants (<i>n</i> = 19; 69.0%) reported a very positive experience using the CPOT-Fam, describing it as \\\"good\\\" and \\\"easy-to-use/clear/straightforward.\\\" We iteratively refined the CPOT-Fam over five cycles using the data collected until no further revisions were suggested.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our preliminary clinical testing suggests that family involvement in pain assessment in the ICU is well perceived. The CPOT-Fam has been further refined and is now ready for clinical pilot testing to determine its feasibility and acceptability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"2235399\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503446/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2023.2235399\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2023.2235399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

导读:重症监护病房(ICU)的许多患者无法沟通。对于这些患者,家庭照顾者(家庭成员/亲密朋友)可以帮助评估疼痛。我们之前改编了重症监护疼痛观察工具(CPOT)供家庭护理人员使用(CPOT- fam)。在这项研究中,我们对CPOT-Fam进行了初步的临床评估,为进一步的工具开发提供信息。方法:为了进行初步测试,我们收集(1)家庭护理人员(CPOT- fam)和护士(CPOT)对ICU患者的疼痛评估,并确定一致性程度(kappa系数,κ);(2)收集家庭护理人员对CPOT- fam的开放式反馈。为了改进,我们与多学科工作组一起使用初步测试数据来改进CPOT-Fam。结果:我们评估了29例患者的家庭照顾者和护士疼痛评分之间的一致性。CPOT- fam和CPOT项目评分(评分≥2被认为是明显疼痛的标志)之间的二元一致性(κ)是公平的,κ = 0.43(95%可信区间[CI] 0.18-0.69)。CPOT-Fam项目呼吸机依从性/发声的一致性最高(加权κ = 0.48, 95% CI 0.15-0.80),肌肉张力的一致性最低(加权κ = 0.10, 95% [CI] -0.17至0.20)。大多数参与者(n = 19;69.0%)报告了使用CPOT-Fam的非常积极的体验,将其描述为“好”和“易于使用/清晰/直接”。我们使用收集到的数据,在五个周期内迭代地改进了CPOT-Fam,直到没有进一步的修订建议。结论:我们的初步临床试验表明,家庭参与在ICU疼痛评估是公认的。CPOT-Fam已经进一步完善,现在准备进行临床试验,以确定其可行性和可接受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Preliminary clinical testing to inform development of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool for Families (CPOT-Fam).

Preliminary clinical testing to inform development of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool for Families (CPOT-Fam).

Preliminary clinical testing to inform development of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool for Families (CPOT-Fam).

Preliminary clinical testing to inform development of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool for Families (CPOT-Fam).

Introduction: Many patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) cannot communicate. For these patients, family caregivers (family members/close friends) could assist in pain assessment. We previously adapted the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) for family caregiver use (CPOT-Fam). In this study, we conducted preliminary clinical evaluation of the CPOT-Fam to inform further tool development.

Methods: For preliminary testing, we collected (1) pain assessments of patients in the ICU from family caregivers (CPOT-Fam) and nurses (CPOT) and determined the degree of agreement (kappa coefficient, κ) and (2) collected openended feedback on the CPOT-Fam from family caregivers. For refinement, we used preliminary testing data to refine the CPOT-Fam with a multidisciplinary working group.

Results: We assessed agreement between family caregiver and nurse pain scores for 29 patients. Binary agreement (κ) between CPOT-Fam and CPOT item scores (scores ≥2 considered indicative of significant pain) was fair, κ = 0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-0.69). Agreement was highest for the CPOT-Fam items ventilator compliance/vocalization (weighted κ = 0.48, 95% CI 0.15-0.80) and lowest for muscle tension (weighted κ = 0.10, 95% [CI] -0.17 to 0.20). Most participants (n = 19; 69.0%) reported a very positive experience using the CPOT-Fam, describing it as "good" and "easy-to-use/clear/straightforward." We iteratively refined the CPOT-Fam over five cycles using the data collected until no further revisions were suggested.

Conclusion: Our preliminary clinical testing suggests that family involvement in pain assessment in the ICU is well perceived. The CPOT-Fam has been further refined and is now ready for clinical pilot testing to determine its feasibility and acceptability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信