马铃薯原生质体基因组编辑优化的胞嘧啶碱基编辑器。

IF 4.9 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Ida Westberg, Frida Meijer Carlsen, Ida Elisabeth Johansen, Bent Larsen Petersen
{"title":"马铃薯原生质体基因组编辑优化的胞嘧啶碱基编辑器。","authors":"Ida Westberg,&nbsp;Frida Meijer Carlsen,&nbsp;Ida Elisabeth Johansen,&nbsp;Bent Larsen Petersen","doi":"10.3389/fgeed.2023.1247702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we generated and compared three cytidine base editors (CBEs) tailor-made for potato (<i>Solanum tuberosum</i>), which conferred up to 43% C-to-T conversion of all alleles in the protoplast pool. Earlier, gene-edited potato plants were successfully generated by polyethylene glycol-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 transformation of protoplasts followed by explant regeneration. In one study, a 3-4-fold increase in editing efficiency was obtained by replacing the standard <i>Arabidopsis thaliana At</i>U6-1 promotor with endogenous potato <i>St</i>U6 promotors driving the expression of the gRNA. Here, we used this optimized construct (<i>Sp</i>Cas9/<i>St</i>U6-1::gRNA1, target gRNA sequence GGTC<sub>4</sub>C<sub>5</sub>TTGGAGC<sub>12</sub>AAAAC<sub>17</sub>TGG) for the generation of CBEs tailor-made for potato and tested for C-to-T base editing in the granule-bound starch synthase 1 gene in the cultivar Desiree. First, the <i>Streptococcus pyogenes</i> Cas9 was converted into a (D10A) nickase (nCas9). Next, one of three cytosine deaminases from human hAPOBEC3A (A3A), rat (evo_rAPOBEC1) (rA1), or sea lamprey (evo_<i>Pm</i>CDA1) (CDA1) was C-terminally fused to nCas9 and a uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor, with each module interspaced with flexible linkers. The CBEs were overall highly efficient, with A3A having the best overall base editing activity, with an average 34.5%, 34.5%, and 27% C-to-T conversion at C4, C5, and C12, respectively, whereas CDA1 showed an average base editing activity of 34.5%, 34%, and 14.25% C-to-T conversion at C4, C5, and C12, respectively. rA1 exhibited an average base editing activity of 18.75% and 19% at C4 and C5 and was the only base editor to show no C-to-T conversion at C12.</p>","PeriodicalId":73086,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in genome editing","volume":"5 ","pages":"1247702"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cytosine base editors optimized for genome editing in potato protoplasts.\",\"authors\":\"Ida Westberg,&nbsp;Frida Meijer Carlsen,&nbsp;Ida Elisabeth Johansen,&nbsp;Bent Larsen Petersen\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fgeed.2023.1247702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this study, we generated and compared three cytidine base editors (CBEs) tailor-made for potato (<i>Solanum tuberosum</i>), which conferred up to 43% C-to-T conversion of all alleles in the protoplast pool. Earlier, gene-edited potato plants were successfully generated by polyethylene glycol-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 transformation of protoplasts followed by explant regeneration. In one study, a 3-4-fold increase in editing efficiency was obtained by replacing the standard <i>Arabidopsis thaliana At</i>U6-1 promotor with endogenous potato <i>St</i>U6 promotors driving the expression of the gRNA. Here, we used this optimized construct (<i>Sp</i>Cas9/<i>St</i>U6-1::gRNA1, target gRNA sequence GGTC<sub>4</sub>C<sub>5</sub>TTGGAGC<sub>12</sub>AAAAC<sub>17</sub>TGG) for the generation of CBEs tailor-made for potato and tested for C-to-T base editing in the granule-bound starch synthase 1 gene in the cultivar Desiree. First, the <i>Streptococcus pyogenes</i> Cas9 was converted into a (D10A) nickase (nCas9). Next, one of three cytosine deaminases from human hAPOBEC3A (A3A), rat (evo_rAPOBEC1) (rA1), or sea lamprey (evo_<i>Pm</i>CDA1) (CDA1) was C-terminally fused to nCas9 and a uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor, with each module interspaced with flexible linkers. The CBEs were overall highly efficient, with A3A having the best overall base editing activity, with an average 34.5%, 34.5%, and 27% C-to-T conversion at C4, C5, and C12, respectively, whereas CDA1 showed an average base editing activity of 34.5%, 34%, and 14.25% C-to-T conversion at C4, C5, and C12, respectively. rA1 exhibited an average base editing activity of 18.75% and 19% at C4 and C5 and was the only base editor to show no C-to-T conversion at C12.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in genome editing\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1247702\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502308/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in genome editing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2023.1247702\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in genome editing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2023.1247702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我们生成并比较了三种为马铃薯(Solanum tuberosum)量身定制的胞苷碱基编辑器(CBEs),它们使原生质体库中所有等位基因的C-to-T转化率高达43%。此前,通过聚乙二醇介导的原生质体CRISPR/Cas9转化,然后外植体再生,成功地产生了基因编辑的马铃薯植株。在一项研究中,用内源马铃薯StU6启动子取代标准拟南芥AtU6-1启动子驱动gRNA的表达,获得了3-4倍的编辑效率提高。在这里,我们使用这个优化的结构(SpCas9/StU6-1::gRNA1,目标gRNA序列GGTC4C5TTGGAGC12AAAAC17TGG)来生成马铃薯定制的CBEs,并在Desiree品种中测试了颗粒结合淀粉合成酶1基因的C-to-T碱基编辑。首先,将化脓性链球菌Cas9转化为(D10A) nickase (nCas9)。接下来,将来自人类hAPOBEC3A (A3A)、大鼠(evo_rAPOBEC1) (rA1)或海七鳃鳗(evo_PmCDA1) (CDA1)的三种胞嘧啶脱氨酶中的一种c端融合到nCas9和尿嘧啶- dna糖基酶抑制剂上,每个模块之间间隔有灵活的连接物。cbe整体效率较高,其中A3A具有最佳的整体碱基编辑活性,C4、C5和C12的c -t转化率分别为34.5%、34.5%和27%,而CDA1在C4、C5和C12的c -t转化率分别为34.5%、34%和14.25%。rA1在C4和C5上的平均碱基编辑活性分别为18.75%和19%,是唯一在C12上没有C-to-T转化的碱基编辑器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cytosine base editors optimized for genome editing in potato protoplasts.

Cytosine base editors optimized for genome editing in potato protoplasts.

Cytosine base editors optimized for genome editing in potato protoplasts.

In this study, we generated and compared three cytidine base editors (CBEs) tailor-made for potato (Solanum tuberosum), which conferred up to 43% C-to-T conversion of all alleles in the protoplast pool. Earlier, gene-edited potato plants were successfully generated by polyethylene glycol-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 transformation of protoplasts followed by explant regeneration. In one study, a 3-4-fold increase in editing efficiency was obtained by replacing the standard Arabidopsis thaliana AtU6-1 promotor with endogenous potato StU6 promotors driving the expression of the gRNA. Here, we used this optimized construct (SpCas9/StU6-1::gRNA1, target gRNA sequence GGTC4C5TTGGAGC12AAAAC17TGG) for the generation of CBEs tailor-made for potato and tested for C-to-T base editing in the granule-bound starch synthase 1 gene in the cultivar Desiree. First, the Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 was converted into a (D10A) nickase (nCas9). Next, one of three cytosine deaminases from human hAPOBEC3A (A3A), rat (evo_rAPOBEC1) (rA1), or sea lamprey (evo_PmCDA1) (CDA1) was C-terminally fused to nCas9 and a uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor, with each module interspaced with flexible linkers. The CBEs were overall highly efficient, with A3A having the best overall base editing activity, with an average 34.5%, 34.5%, and 27% C-to-T conversion at C4, C5, and C12, respectively, whereas CDA1 showed an average base editing activity of 34.5%, 34%, and 14.25% C-to-T conversion at C4, C5, and C12, respectively. rA1 exhibited an average base editing activity of 18.75% and 19% at C4 and C5 and was the only base editor to show no C-to-T conversion at C12.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信