微塑料分析:为什么我们不应该低估空白对照的重要性。

Microplastics and nanoplastics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1186/s43591-023-00065-3
Michael J Noonan, Nicole Grechi, C Lauren Mills, Marcia de A M M Ferraz
{"title":"微塑料分析:为什么我们不应该低估空白对照的重要性。","authors":"Michael J Noonan,&nbsp;Nicole Grechi,&nbsp;C Lauren Mills,&nbsp;Marcia de A M M Ferraz","doi":"10.1186/s43591-023-00065-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent years have seen considerable scientific attention devoted towards documenting the presence of microplastics (MPs) in environmental samples. Due to omnipresence of environmental microplastics, however, disentangling environmental MPs from sample contamination is a challenge. Hence, the environmental (collection site and laboratory) microplastics contamination of samples during processing is a reality that we must address, in order to generate reproducible and reliable data. Here we investigated published literature and have found that around 1/5 of studies failed to use blank controls in their experiments. Additionally, only 34% of the studies used a controlled air environment for their sample processing (laminar flow, fume hood, closed laboratory, clean room, etc.). In that regard, we have also shown that preparing samples in the fume hood, leads to more microplastics > 1 μm) contamination than preparing it in the laboratory bench and the laminar flow. Although it did not completely prevent microplastics contamination, the processing of sample inside the laminar flow is the best option to reduce sample contamination during processing. Overall, we showed that blank controls are a must in microplastics sample preparation, but it is often overlooked by researchers.</p><p><strong>Graphical abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43591-023-00065-3.</p>","PeriodicalId":74190,"journal":{"name":"Microplastics and nanoplastics","volume":"3 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10390371/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microplastics analytics: why we should not underestimate the importance of blank controls.\",\"authors\":\"Michael J Noonan,&nbsp;Nicole Grechi,&nbsp;C Lauren Mills,&nbsp;Marcia de A M M Ferraz\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43591-023-00065-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent years have seen considerable scientific attention devoted towards documenting the presence of microplastics (MPs) in environmental samples. Due to omnipresence of environmental microplastics, however, disentangling environmental MPs from sample contamination is a challenge. Hence, the environmental (collection site and laboratory) microplastics contamination of samples during processing is a reality that we must address, in order to generate reproducible and reliable data. Here we investigated published literature and have found that around 1/5 of studies failed to use blank controls in their experiments. Additionally, only 34% of the studies used a controlled air environment for their sample processing (laminar flow, fume hood, closed laboratory, clean room, etc.). In that regard, we have also shown that preparing samples in the fume hood, leads to more microplastics > 1 μm) contamination than preparing it in the laboratory bench and the laminar flow. Although it did not completely prevent microplastics contamination, the processing of sample inside the laminar flow is the best option to reduce sample contamination during processing. Overall, we showed that blank controls are a must in microplastics sample preparation, but it is often overlooked by researchers.</p><p><strong>Graphical abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43591-023-00065-3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microplastics and nanoplastics\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10390371/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microplastics and nanoplastics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-023-00065-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microplastics and nanoplastics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-023-00065-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

近年来,科学界对记录环境样本中微塑料的存在给予了相当大的关注。然而,由于环境微塑料无处不在,将环境MP与样本污染分离是一项挑战。因此,为了产生可重复和可靠的数据,我们必须解决样品在加工过程中受到的环境(采集点和实验室)微塑料污染问题。在这里,我们调查了已发表的文献,发现大约五分之一的研究未能在实验中使用空白对照。此外,只有34%的研究使用受控的空气环境进行样品处理(层流、通风橱、封闭实验室、洁净室等)。在这方面,我们还表明,在通风橱中制备样品比在实验室工作台和层流中制备样本会导致更多>1μm的微塑料污染。尽管它不能完全防止微塑料污染,但在层流中处理样品是减少处理过程中样品污染的最佳选择。总的来说,我们表明空白对照是微塑料样品制备中的必要条件,但研究人员经常忽视这一点。图形摘要:补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,可访问10.1186/s43591-023-0065-3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Microplastics analytics: why we should not underestimate the importance of blank controls.

Microplastics analytics: why we should not underestimate the importance of blank controls.

Microplastics analytics: why we should not underestimate the importance of blank controls.

Microplastics analytics: why we should not underestimate the importance of blank controls.

Recent years have seen considerable scientific attention devoted towards documenting the presence of microplastics (MPs) in environmental samples. Due to omnipresence of environmental microplastics, however, disentangling environmental MPs from sample contamination is a challenge. Hence, the environmental (collection site and laboratory) microplastics contamination of samples during processing is a reality that we must address, in order to generate reproducible and reliable data. Here we investigated published literature and have found that around 1/5 of studies failed to use blank controls in their experiments. Additionally, only 34% of the studies used a controlled air environment for their sample processing (laminar flow, fume hood, closed laboratory, clean room, etc.). In that regard, we have also shown that preparing samples in the fume hood, leads to more microplastics > 1 μm) contamination than preparing it in the laboratory bench and the laminar flow. Although it did not completely prevent microplastics contamination, the processing of sample inside the laminar flow is the best option to reduce sample contamination during processing. Overall, we showed that blank controls are a must in microplastics sample preparation, but it is often overlooked by researchers.

Graphical abstract:

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43591-023-00065-3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信