老年多发性硬化患者的治疗:一项国际德尔菲调查的结果。

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hayrettin Tumani, Patricia K Coyle, Claudia Cárcamo, Cinzia Cordioli, Pablo A López, Marek Peterka, Cristina Ramo-Tello, María I Zuluaga, Thijs Koster, Megan Vignos
{"title":"老年多发性硬化患者的治疗:一项国际德尔菲调查的结果。","authors":"Hayrettin Tumani,&nbsp;Patricia K Coyle,&nbsp;Claudia Cárcamo,&nbsp;Cinzia Cordioli,&nbsp;Pablo A López,&nbsp;Marek Peterka,&nbsp;Cristina Ramo-Tello,&nbsp;María I Zuluaga,&nbsp;Thijs Koster,&nbsp;Megan Vignos","doi":"10.1177/20552173231198588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People over age 50-55 have historically been excluded from randomized clinical trials for multiple sclerosis (MS). However, more than half of those living with an MS diagnosis are over 55.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Explore the unique considerations of treating older people with MS (PwMS) using an iterative and structured Delphi-based assessment to gather expert opinions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight MS neurologists with an interest in older PwMS developed a 2-round survey. Survey respondents were qualified neurologists with ≥3 years' experience, personally responsible for treatment decisions, and treating ≥20 patients per month, of whom ≥10% were ≥50 years old. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement on questions with categorical responses or as a mean score ≥4 on questions with numerical responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Survey 1, 224 neurologists responded; 180 of these completed Survey 2. Limited consensus was reached with varying levels of agreement on several topics including identification and assessment of older patients; factors relating to treatment decisions including immunosenescence and comorbidities; considerations for high-efficacy treatments; de-escalation or discontinuation of treatment; effects of COVID-19; and unmet needs for treating this population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this Delphi process highlight the need for targeted studies to create guidance for the care of older PwMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":18961,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical","volume":"9 3","pages":"20552173231198588"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bc/a3/10.1177_20552173231198588.PMC10501080.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of older patients with multiple sclerosis: Results of an International Delphi Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Hayrettin Tumani,&nbsp;Patricia K Coyle,&nbsp;Claudia Cárcamo,&nbsp;Cinzia Cordioli,&nbsp;Pablo A López,&nbsp;Marek Peterka,&nbsp;Cristina Ramo-Tello,&nbsp;María I Zuluaga,&nbsp;Thijs Koster,&nbsp;Megan Vignos\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20552173231198588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People over age 50-55 have historically been excluded from randomized clinical trials for multiple sclerosis (MS). However, more than half of those living with an MS diagnosis are over 55.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Explore the unique considerations of treating older people with MS (PwMS) using an iterative and structured Delphi-based assessment to gather expert opinions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight MS neurologists with an interest in older PwMS developed a 2-round survey. Survey respondents were qualified neurologists with ≥3 years' experience, personally responsible for treatment decisions, and treating ≥20 patients per month, of whom ≥10% were ≥50 years old. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement on questions with categorical responses or as a mean score ≥4 on questions with numerical responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Survey 1, 224 neurologists responded; 180 of these completed Survey 2. Limited consensus was reached with varying levels of agreement on several topics including identification and assessment of older patients; factors relating to treatment decisions including immunosenescence and comorbidities; considerations for high-efficacy treatments; de-escalation or discontinuation of treatment; effects of COVID-19; and unmet needs for treating this population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this Delphi process highlight the need for targeted studies to create guidance for the care of older PwMS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"20552173231198588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bc/a3/10.1177_20552173231198588.PMC10501080.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552173231198588\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552173231198588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:50-55岁以上的人群历来被排除在多发性硬化症(MS)的随机临床试验之外。然而,超过一半的MS患者年龄在55岁以上。目的:探讨使用迭代和结构化的基于delphi的评估来收集专家意见治疗老年多发性硬化症(PwMS)的独特考虑。方法:8名对老年PwMS感兴趣的MS神经科医生进行了2轮调查。调查对象为具有≥3年经验的合格神经科医生,个人负责治疗决策,每月治疗≥20例患者,其中≥10%年龄≥50岁。共识定义为在分类回答问题上的一致性≥75%,或在数字回答问题上的平均得分≥4。结果:在调查1中,有224名神经科医生回复;其中180人完成了调查二。在几个主题上达成了有限的共识,并在不同程度上达成了一致,包括老年患者的识别和评估;与治疗决定有关的因素,包括免疫衰老和合并症;高效治疗的考虑;治疗降级或停止治疗;COVID-19的影响;以及治疗这一人群的未满足需求。结论:德尔菲过程的结果强调需要有针对性的研究,为老年PwMS的护理创造指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Treatment of older patients with multiple sclerosis: Results of an International Delphi Survey.

Treatment of older patients with multiple sclerosis: Results of an International Delphi Survey.

Treatment of older patients with multiple sclerosis: Results of an International Delphi Survey.

Treatment of older patients with multiple sclerosis: Results of an International Delphi Survey.

Background: People over age 50-55 have historically been excluded from randomized clinical trials for multiple sclerosis (MS). However, more than half of those living with an MS diagnosis are over 55.

Objective: Explore the unique considerations of treating older people with MS (PwMS) using an iterative and structured Delphi-based assessment to gather expert opinions.

Methods: Eight MS neurologists with an interest in older PwMS developed a 2-round survey. Survey respondents were qualified neurologists with ≥3 years' experience, personally responsible for treatment decisions, and treating ≥20 patients per month, of whom ≥10% were ≥50 years old. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement on questions with categorical responses or as a mean score ≥4 on questions with numerical responses.

Results: In Survey 1, 224 neurologists responded; 180 of these completed Survey 2. Limited consensus was reached with varying levels of agreement on several topics including identification and assessment of older patients; factors relating to treatment decisions including immunosenescence and comorbidities; considerations for high-efficacy treatments; de-escalation or discontinuation of treatment; effects of COVID-19; and unmet needs for treating this population.

Conclusion: The results of this Delphi process highlight the need for targeted studies to create guidance for the care of older PwMS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信