Edgard Jabbour, Joseph Sabbagh, Edmond Koyess, Maya Feghali
{"title":"三种灌溉激活方式对WaveOne Gold®单锉后污层和碎片去除效率的比较","authors":"Edgard Jabbour, Joseph Sabbagh, Edmond Koyess, Maya Feghali","doi":"10.5455/aim.2023.31.131-136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An endodontic treatment consists in cleaning, shaping and filling the root canal system. Irrigation is the chemical part of the process that ensures the total removal of debris. Activating the irrigation solution will improve and accelerate the process.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to evaluate the removal of debris and smear layer at 1, 3, and 5mm from the foramen after needle irrigation, EndoActivator® and Irrisafe®. Sixty single-rooted teeth were prepared using Primary WaveOne Gold®.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Teeth were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=15): needle irrigation - Group A, EndoActivator® for 1 min - Group B, Irrisafe® for 1 min - Group C, Irrisafe® for 30 sec - Group D. Root canals were observed under a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed by Friedman and Wilcoxon tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Debris was significantly higher with group A compared to B, C, and D. Irrisafe® was significantly more effective in removing the smear layer than the other groups. However, activation techniques showed less debris and smear layer than needle alone nevertheless.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Irrisafe® showed the best results regardless of time.</p>","PeriodicalId":7074,"journal":{"name":"Acta Informatica Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/02/AIM-31-131.PMC10503892.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Three Activating Methods of Irrigation on Smear Layer- and Debris-Removal Efficiency After WaveOne Gold® Single File.\",\"authors\":\"Edgard Jabbour, Joseph Sabbagh, Edmond Koyess, Maya Feghali\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/aim.2023.31.131-136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An endodontic treatment consists in cleaning, shaping and filling the root canal system. Irrigation is the chemical part of the process that ensures the total removal of debris. Activating the irrigation solution will improve and accelerate the process.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to evaluate the removal of debris and smear layer at 1, 3, and 5mm from the foramen after needle irrigation, EndoActivator® and Irrisafe®. Sixty single-rooted teeth were prepared using Primary WaveOne Gold®.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Teeth were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=15): needle irrigation - Group A, EndoActivator® for 1 min - Group B, Irrisafe® for 1 min - Group C, Irrisafe® for 30 sec - Group D. Root canals were observed under a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed by Friedman and Wilcoxon tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Debris was significantly higher with group A compared to B, C, and D. Irrisafe® was significantly more effective in removing the smear layer than the other groups. However, activation techniques showed less debris and smear layer than needle alone nevertheless.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Irrisafe® showed the best results regardless of time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Informatica Medica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/02/AIM-31-131.PMC10503892.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Informatica Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2023.31.131-136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Informatica Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2023.31.131-136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:根管治疗包括清洁、塑形和填充根管系统。灌溉是这个过程的化学部分，它确保了垃圾的完全清除。激活灌溉溶液将改善和加速这一过程。目的:本研究的目的是评估针头冲洗、EndoActivator®和Irrisafe®后，距孔1、3和5mm处的碎屑和涂抹层的去除情况。使用Primary WaveOne Gold®制备60颗单根牙。方法:将牙齿随机分为4组(n=15): A组，EndoActivator®灌洗1 min - B组，Irrisafe®灌洗1 min - C组，Irrisafe®灌洗30秒- d组，在扫描电镜下观察根管。数据分析采用Friedman和Wilcoxon检验。结果:与B、C和d组相比，A组的脏污明显更高。Irrisafe®清除脏污层的效果明显优于其他组。然而，激活技术显示的碎片和涂抹层比单独针刺少。结论:不论时间长短，Irrisafe®均表现出最佳效果。
Comparison of Three Activating Methods of Irrigation on Smear Layer- and Debris-Removal Efficiency After WaveOne Gold® Single File.
Background: An endodontic treatment consists in cleaning, shaping and filling the root canal system. Irrigation is the chemical part of the process that ensures the total removal of debris. Activating the irrigation solution will improve and accelerate the process.
Objective: The aim of the study is to evaluate the removal of debris and smear layer at 1, 3, and 5mm from the foramen after needle irrigation, EndoActivator® and Irrisafe®. Sixty single-rooted teeth were prepared using Primary WaveOne Gold®.
Methods: Teeth were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=15): needle irrigation - Group A, EndoActivator® for 1 min - Group B, Irrisafe® for 1 min - Group C, Irrisafe® for 30 sec - Group D. Root canals were observed under a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed by Friedman and Wilcoxon tests.
Results: Debris was significantly higher with group A compared to B, C, and D. Irrisafe® was significantly more effective in removing the smear layer than the other groups. However, activation techniques showed less debris and smear layer than needle alone nevertheless.
Conclusion: Irrisafe® showed the best results regardless of time.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
