谁放置饲管,在什么情况下?

Q1 Medicine
Apeksha Shah, Rebecca A Busch, Erica Knavel Koepsel, Mohamed Eisa, Michael Woods, Sonali Palchaudhuri
{"title":"谁放置饲管,在什么情况下?","authors":"Apeksha Shah,&nbsp;Rebecca A Busch,&nbsp;Erica Knavel Koepsel,&nbsp;Mohamed Eisa,&nbsp;Michael Woods,&nbsp;Sonali Palchaudhuri","doi":"10.1007/s11894-023-00880-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Enteral feeding is commonly used to provide patients with nutrition. Access via feeding tubes can be attained by multiple medical specialties through a variety of methods.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There are limited data available on direct comparisons amongst gastroenterologist, interventional radiologists and surgeons, although there appears to be similar rates of complications. Fluroscopically and surgically placed feeding tubes may have a higher technical success rate than endoscopically placed tubes. The preferred specialty for feeding tube placement varies per institution, often due to logistical matters over technique or concern for complications. Ideally, a multidisciplinary team should exist to determine which approach is best in a patient-specific manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"25 8","pages":"175-181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Places Feeding Tubes and in What Scenario?\",\"authors\":\"Apeksha Shah,&nbsp;Rebecca A Busch,&nbsp;Erica Knavel Koepsel,&nbsp;Mohamed Eisa,&nbsp;Michael Woods,&nbsp;Sonali Palchaudhuri\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11894-023-00880-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Enteral feeding is commonly used to provide patients with nutrition. Access via feeding tubes can be attained by multiple medical specialties through a variety of methods.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There are limited data available on direct comparisons amongst gastroenterologist, interventional radiologists and surgeons, although there appears to be similar rates of complications. Fluroscopically and surgically placed feeding tubes may have a higher technical success rate than endoscopically placed tubes. The preferred specialty for feeding tube placement varies per institution, often due to logistical matters over technique or concern for complications. Ideally, a multidisciplinary team should exist to determine which approach is best in a patient-specific manner.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Gastroenterology Reports\",\"volume\":\"25 8\",\"pages\":\"175-181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Gastroenterology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-023-00880-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-023-00880-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:肠内喂养是为患者提供营养的常用方法。通过喂食管可以通过多种医学专业通过各种方法获得。最近的发现:在胃肠病学家、介入放射科医生和外科医生之间进行直接比较的数据有限,尽管并发症的发生率似乎相似。透视法和外科置入的饲管比内窥镜置入的饲管技术成功率更高。每个机构的首选专科都不一样,通常是由于后勤问题而不是技术或对并发症的关注。理想情况下,应该有一个多学科的团队来确定哪种方法最适合患者的具体情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who Places Feeding Tubes and in What Scenario?

Purpose of review: Enteral feeding is commonly used to provide patients with nutrition. Access via feeding tubes can be attained by multiple medical specialties through a variety of methods.

Recent findings: There are limited data available on direct comparisons amongst gastroenterologist, interventional radiologists and surgeons, although there appears to be similar rates of complications. Fluroscopically and surgically placed feeding tubes may have a higher technical success rate than endoscopically placed tubes. The preferred specialty for feeding tube placement varies per institution, often due to logistical matters over technique or concern for complications. Ideally, a multidisciplinary team should exist to determine which approach is best in a patient-specific manner.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Gastroenterology Reports
Current Gastroenterology Reports Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: As the field of gastroenterology and hepatology rapidly evolves, the wealth of published literature can be overwhelming. The aim of the journal is to help readers stay abreast of such advances by offering authoritative, systematic reviews by leading experts. We accomplish this aim by appointing Section Editors who invite international experts to contribute review articles that highlight recent developments and important papers published in the past year. Major topics in gastroenterology are covered, including pediatric gastroenterology, neuromuscular disorders, infections, nutrition, and inflammatory bowel disease. These reviews provide clear, insightful summaries of expert perspectives relevant to clinical practice. An Editorial Board of internationally diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信