集群虚拟现实感光度新测试的远程培训、上门测试和测试-重测变异性评估

IF 2.8 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Zer Keen Chia MD , Alan W. Kong MD , Marcus L. Turner MD , Murtaza Saifee MD , Bertil E. Damato MD, PhD , Benjamin T. Backus PhD , James J. Blaha , Joel S. Schuman MD , Michael S. Deiner MD , Yvonne Ou MD
{"title":"集群虚拟现实感光度新测试的远程培训、上门测试和测试-重测变异性评估","authors":"Zer Keen Chia MD ,&nbsp;Alan W. Kong MD ,&nbsp;Marcus L. Turner MD ,&nbsp;Murtaza Saifee MD ,&nbsp;Bertil E. Damato MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Benjamin T. Backus PhD ,&nbsp;James J. Blaha ,&nbsp;Joel S. Schuman MD ,&nbsp;Michael S. Deiner MD ,&nbsp;Yvonne Ou MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2023.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the feasibility of remotely training glaucoma patients to take a 10-session clustered virtual reality (VR) visual field (VF) test (Vivid Vision Perimetry [VVP-10]) at home, analyze results for test-retest variability, and assess correspondence with conventional perimetry.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><p>Twenty-one subjects with glaucoma were enrolled and included in the feasibility assessment of remote training. Thirty-six eyes were used for test-retest analysis and determination of concordance with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Subjects were provided with a mobile VR headset containing the VVP-10 test software and trained remotely via video conferencing. Subjects were instructed to complete 10 sessions over a 14-day period.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Feasibility was determined by the number of subjects who were able to independently complete VVP-10 over the 14-day period after 1 remote training session. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for average fraction seen across 10 sessions and the standard error (SE) of the mean were primary outcome measures for assessing test-retest variability. Correlation with HFA mean sensitivity (MS) across eyes, was a secondary outcome measure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty subjects (95%) successfully completed the VVP-10 test series after 1 training session. The ICC for VVP-10 was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92–0.97). The mean SE in units of fraction seen was 0.012. The Spearman correlations between VVP-10 average fraction seen and HFA MS were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.66–0.98) for moderate-to-advanced glaucoma eyes, and decreased to 0.67 (95% CI, 0.28–0.94) when all eyes were included.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Remote training of patients at home is feasible, and subsequent remote clustered VF testing using VVP-10 by patients on their own, without any further interactions with caregivers or study staff, was possible. At-home VVP-10 results demonstrated low test-retest variability. Future studies must be conducted to determine if VVP-10, taken at home as convenient for the patient, may be a viable supplement to provide equivalent or complementary results to that of standard in-clinic assessment of visual function in glaucoma.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19519,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589419623001606/pdfft?md5=149fb6ed7c569868b5d6801b82a0ead2&pid=1-s2.0-S2589419623001606-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Remote Training, At-Home Testing, and Test-Retest Variability of a Novel Test for Clustered Virtual Reality Perimetry\",\"authors\":\"Zer Keen Chia MD ,&nbsp;Alan W. Kong MD ,&nbsp;Marcus L. Turner MD ,&nbsp;Murtaza Saifee MD ,&nbsp;Bertil E. Damato MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Benjamin T. Backus PhD ,&nbsp;James J. Blaha ,&nbsp;Joel S. Schuman MD ,&nbsp;Michael S. Deiner MD ,&nbsp;Yvonne Ou MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ogla.2023.08.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the feasibility of remotely training glaucoma patients to take a 10-session clustered virtual reality (VR) visual field (VF) test (Vivid Vision Perimetry [VVP-10]) at home, analyze results for test-retest variability, and assess correspondence with conventional perimetry.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><p>Twenty-one subjects with glaucoma were enrolled and included in the feasibility assessment of remote training. Thirty-six eyes were used for test-retest analysis and determination of concordance with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Subjects were provided with a mobile VR headset containing the VVP-10 test software and trained remotely via video conferencing. Subjects were instructed to complete 10 sessions over a 14-day period.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Feasibility was determined by the number of subjects who were able to independently complete VVP-10 over the 14-day period after 1 remote training session. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for average fraction seen across 10 sessions and the standard error (SE) of the mean were primary outcome measures for assessing test-retest variability. Correlation with HFA mean sensitivity (MS) across eyes, was a secondary outcome measure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty subjects (95%) successfully completed the VVP-10 test series after 1 training session. The ICC for VVP-10 was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92–0.97). The mean SE in units of fraction seen was 0.012. The Spearman correlations between VVP-10 average fraction seen and HFA MS were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.66–0.98) for moderate-to-advanced glaucoma eyes, and decreased to 0.67 (95% CI, 0.28–0.94) when all eyes were included.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Remote training of patients at home is feasible, and subsequent remote clustered VF testing using VVP-10 by patients on their own, without any further interactions with caregivers or study staff, was possible. At-home VVP-10 results demonstrated low test-retest variability. Future studies must be conducted to determine if VVP-10, taken at home as convenient for the patient, may be a viable supplement to provide equivalent or complementary results to that of standard in-clinic assessment of visual function in glaucoma.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589419623001606/pdfft?md5=149fb6ed7c569868b5d6801b82a0ead2&pid=1-s2.0-S2589419623001606-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589419623001606\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589419623001606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估远程培训青光眼患者在家中进行为期 10 次的虚拟现实(VR)视野(VF)测试(Vivid Vision Perimetry [VVP-10])的可行性,分析测试结果的重测变异性,并评估与传统周边测量法的对应关系。方法为受试者提供包含 VVP-10 测试软件的移动 VR 头显,并通过视频会议进行远程培训。主要结果测量可行性由经过 1 次远程培训后能够在 14 天内独立完成 VVP-10 测试的受试者人数决定。10次训练中平均分数的类内相关系数(ICC)和平均值的标准误差(SE)是评估测试-再测变异性的主要结果指标。结果20 名受试者(95%)在接受 1 次培训后成功完成了 VVP-10 测试系列。VVP-10 的 ICC 为 0.95(95% 置信区间 [CI],0.92-0.97)。以所见分数为单位的平均 SE 为 0.012。对于中晚期青光眼眼,VVP-10 平均所见分数与 HFA MS 之间的斯皮尔曼相关性为 0.87(95% CI,0.66-0.98),当包括所有眼时,相关性降至 0.67(95% CI,0.28-0.94)。居家 VVP-10 测试结果显示出较低的测试重复变异性。未来的研究必须确定在患者方便的情况下在家进行 VVP-10 是否是一种可行的补充方法,以提供与标准的青光眼视功能门诊评估相当或互补的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Remote Training, At-Home Testing, and Test-Retest Variability of a Novel Test for Clustered Virtual Reality Perimetry

Objective

To assess the feasibility of remotely training glaucoma patients to take a 10-session clustered virtual reality (VR) visual field (VF) test (Vivid Vision Perimetry [VVP-10]) at home, analyze results for test-retest variability, and assess correspondence with conventional perimetry.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Subjects

Twenty-one subjects with glaucoma were enrolled and included in the feasibility assessment of remote training. Thirty-six eyes were used for test-retest analysis and determination of concordance with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA).

Methods

Subjects were provided with a mobile VR headset containing the VVP-10 test software and trained remotely via video conferencing. Subjects were instructed to complete 10 sessions over a 14-day period.

Main Outcome Measures

Feasibility was determined by the number of subjects who were able to independently complete VVP-10 over the 14-day period after 1 remote training session. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for average fraction seen across 10 sessions and the standard error (SE) of the mean were primary outcome measures for assessing test-retest variability. Correlation with HFA mean sensitivity (MS) across eyes, was a secondary outcome measure.

Results

Twenty subjects (95%) successfully completed the VVP-10 test series after 1 training session. The ICC for VVP-10 was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92–0.97). The mean SE in units of fraction seen was 0.012. The Spearman correlations between VVP-10 average fraction seen and HFA MS were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.66–0.98) for moderate-to-advanced glaucoma eyes, and decreased to 0.67 (95% CI, 0.28–0.94) when all eyes were included.

Conclusions

Remote training of patients at home is feasible, and subsequent remote clustered VF testing using VVP-10 by patients on their own, without any further interactions with caregivers or study staff, was possible. At-home VVP-10 results demonstrated low test-retest variability. Future studies must be conducted to determine if VVP-10, taken at home as convenient for the patient, may be a viable supplement to provide equivalent or complementary results to that of standard in-clinic assessment of visual function in glaucoma.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
140
审稿时长
46 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信