{"title":"巴巴多斯2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病困扰:一项试点试验。","authors":"Allison Dasantos, Carlisle Goddard, Donna-Maria Maynard, Dalip Ragoobirsingh","doi":"10.1177/22799036231187006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One in five Barbadians has diabetes, suggesting that there is a severe burden of the disease.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the psychometric properties of the Diabetes Distress Scale, in order to determine the feasibility, practicality, internal consistency and criterion validity of the instrument when used with Barbadians living with Type 2 Diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with type 2 diabetes, (<i>n</i> = 106. 60% females, 40% males; mean age = 65.2, 11.3 years) attending a private clinic in Barbados were assessed for diabetes distress, depression, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) and blood pressure (BP).A self-report questionnaire that included: clinical and demographic questions; the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS); the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); and the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID-5) scale. Glycated haemaglobin (HbA1C) and Blood pressure (BP) were also measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 110 persons who participated, 106 persons completed the questionnaire. The Cronbach alpha coefficient of the PAID was 0.92 and the DDS was 0.92. Concurrent validity was demonstrated in a strong consistent relationship between the scores on the DDS and PAID-5, with a strong positive correlation, <i>r</i> = 0.70, n = 86, <i>p</i> < 0.001. There was a significant difference in the DDS scores between males (<i>M</i> = 1.26, SD = 0.37) and females (<i>M</i> = 1.50, SD = 0.73), <i>t</i>(73.31) = -1.99, p = 0.05 two tailed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DDS is shown to be a valid and reliable measure within this Caribbean context. Thus, researchers and clinicians desirous of a tool to assess Diabetes Distress may be assured of the strong psychometric properties demonstrated thus far.</p>","PeriodicalId":45958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/06/95/10.1177_22799036231187006.PMC10399254.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diabetes distress in a Barbadian population with type 2 diabetes: A pilot test.\",\"authors\":\"Allison Dasantos, Carlisle Goddard, Donna-Maria Maynard, Dalip Ragoobirsingh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22799036231187006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>One in five Barbadians has diabetes, suggesting that there is a severe burden of the disease.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the psychometric properties of the Diabetes Distress Scale, in order to determine the feasibility, practicality, internal consistency and criterion validity of the instrument when used with Barbadians living with Type 2 Diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with type 2 diabetes, (<i>n</i> = 106. 60% females, 40% males; mean age = 65.2, 11.3 years) attending a private clinic in Barbados were assessed for diabetes distress, depression, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) and blood pressure (BP).A self-report questionnaire that included: clinical and demographic questions; the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS); the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); and the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID-5) scale. Glycated haemaglobin (HbA1C) and Blood pressure (BP) were also measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 110 persons who participated, 106 persons completed the questionnaire. The Cronbach alpha coefficient of the PAID was 0.92 and the DDS was 0.92. Concurrent validity was demonstrated in a strong consistent relationship between the scores on the DDS and PAID-5, with a strong positive correlation, <i>r</i> = 0.70, n = 86, <i>p</i> < 0.001. There was a significant difference in the DDS scores between males (<i>M</i> = 1.26, SD = 0.37) and females (<i>M</i> = 1.50, SD = 0.73), <i>t</i>(73.31) = -1.99, p = 0.05 two tailed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DDS is shown to be a valid and reliable measure within this Caribbean context. Thus, researchers and clinicians desirous of a tool to assess Diabetes Distress may be assured of the strong psychometric properties demonstrated thus far.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/06/95/10.1177_22799036231187006.PMC10399254.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036231187006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036231187006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
五分之一的巴巴多斯人患有糖尿病,这表明该疾病是一个严重的负担。目的:评估糖尿病困扰量表的心理测量特性,以确定该量表在巴巴多斯2型糖尿病患者中的可行性、实用性、内部一致性和标准效度。方法:2型糖尿病患者106例。60%的女性,40%的男性;平均年龄为65.2岁,11.3岁),在巴巴多斯一家私人诊所接受糖尿病困扰、抑郁、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)和血压(BP)评估。一份自我报告问卷,包括:临床和人口问题;糖尿病困扰量表(DDS);患者健康问卷(PHQ-9);以及糖尿病问题领域(PAID-5)量表。同时测量糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)和血压(BP)。结果:在110名参与者中,106人完成了问卷调查。受试者的Cronbach α系数为0.92,DDS为0.92。同时效度在DDS和PAID-5得分之间表现出较强的一致关系,具有较强的正相关,r = 0.70, n = 86, p M = 1.26, SD = 0.37)与女性(M = 1.50, SD = 0.73), t(73.31) = -1.99, p = 0.05。结论:在加勒比地区,DDS是一种有效和可靠的测量方法。因此,研究人员和临床医生渴望一种评估糖尿病困扰的工具,可以确保迄今为止所证明的强大的心理测量特性。
Diabetes distress in a Barbadian population with type 2 diabetes: A pilot test.
One in five Barbadians has diabetes, suggesting that there is a severe burden of the disease.
Objective: To assess the psychometric properties of the Diabetes Distress Scale, in order to determine the feasibility, practicality, internal consistency and criterion validity of the instrument when used with Barbadians living with Type 2 Diabetes.
Methods: Patients with type 2 diabetes, (n = 106. 60% females, 40% males; mean age = 65.2, 11.3 years) attending a private clinic in Barbados were assessed for diabetes distress, depression, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) and blood pressure (BP).A self-report questionnaire that included: clinical and demographic questions; the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS); the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); and the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID-5) scale. Glycated haemaglobin (HbA1C) and Blood pressure (BP) were also measured.
Results: Of the 110 persons who participated, 106 persons completed the questionnaire. The Cronbach alpha coefficient of the PAID was 0.92 and the DDS was 0.92. Concurrent validity was demonstrated in a strong consistent relationship between the scores on the DDS and PAID-5, with a strong positive correlation, r = 0.70, n = 86, p < 0.001. There was a significant difference in the DDS scores between males (M = 1.26, SD = 0.37) and females (M = 1.50, SD = 0.73), t(73.31) = -1.99, p = 0.05 two tailed.
Conclusion: The DDS is shown to be a valid and reliable measure within this Caribbean context. Thus, researchers and clinicians desirous of a tool to assess Diabetes Distress may be assured of the strong psychometric properties demonstrated thus far.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Public Health Research (JPHR) is an online Open Access, peer-reviewed journal in the field of public health science. The aim of the journal is to stimulate debate and dissemination of knowledge in the public health field in order to improve efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of public health interventions to improve health outcomes of populations. This aim can only be achieved by adopting a global and multidisciplinary approach. The Journal of Public Health Research publishes contributions from both the “traditional'' disciplines of public health, including hygiene, epidemiology, health education, environmental health, occupational health, health policy, hospital management, health economics, law and ethics as well as from the area of new health care fields including social science, communication science, eHealth and mHealth philosophy, health technology assessment, genetics research implications, population-mental health, gender and disparity issues, global and migration-related themes. In support of this approach, JPHR strongly encourages the use of real multidisciplinary approaches and analyses in the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In addition to Original research, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis and Perspectives and Debate articles, JPHR publishes newsworthy Brief Reports, Letters and Study Protocols related to public health and public health management activities.