不同运动项目优秀运动员肺功能、支气管高反应性和呼吸健康的差异。

Guro P. Bernhardsen, Julie Stang, Thomas Halvorsen, Trine Stensrud
{"title":"不同运动项目优秀运动员肺功能、支气管高反应性和呼吸健康的差异。","authors":"Guro P. Bernhardsen,&nbsp;Julie Stang,&nbsp;Thomas Halvorsen,&nbsp;Trine Stensrud","doi":"10.1080/17461391.2022.2113144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to examine lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and exercise-induced respiratory symptoms in elite athletes performing different sports. Norwegian national-team athletes (30 swimmers, 32 cross-country skiers, 16 speed-skaters, 11 rowers/paddlers, 17 handball players and 23 soccer players) completed a validated questionnaire, measured exhaled nitric oxide (FE<sub>NO</sub>), spirometry, methacholine provocation (PD<sub>20met</sub>) and skin prick test. Three cut-off levels defined BHR; i.e. PD<sub>20met</sub> ≤2 µmol, ≤4 µmol and ≤8 µmol. Mean forced vital capacity (FVC) was highest in swimmers (Mean z-score[95%CI]  = 1.16 [0.80, 1.51]), and close to or higher than reference values according to the Global Lung Initiative equation, across all sports. Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>) was higher than reference values in swimmers (0.48 [0.13, 0.84]), and ball game athletes (0.69 [0.41, 0.97]). Mean forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of FVC (FEF<sub>25–75</sub>), and/or FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC were lower than reference values in all endurance groups. BHR defined by ≤2 and ≤8 µmol methacholine was observed in respectively 50%–87% of swimmers, 25%–47% of cross-country skiers, 20%–53% of speed-skaters, 18%–36% of rowers/paddlers, and 0%–17% of the ball game athletes. Exercise-induced symptoms were common in all groups, most frequent in cross-country skiers (88%), swimmers (83%) and speed-skaters (81%).</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"23 8","pages":"1480-1489"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/17461391.2022.2113144","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and respiratory health between elite athletes competing in different sports\",\"authors\":\"Guro P. Bernhardsen,&nbsp;Julie Stang,&nbsp;Thomas Halvorsen,&nbsp;Trine Stensrud\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17461391.2022.2113144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this study was to examine lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and exercise-induced respiratory symptoms in elite athletes performing different sports. Norwegian national-team athletes (30 swimmers, 32 cross-country skiers, 16 speed-skaters, 11 rowers/paddlers, 17 handball players and 23 soccer players) completed a validated questionnaire, measured exhaled nitric oxide (FE<sub>NO</sub>), spirometry, methacholine provocation (PD<sub>20met</sub>) and skin prick test. Three cut-off levels defined BHR; i.e. PD<sub>20met</sub> ≤2 µmol, ≤4 µmol and ≤8 µmol. Mean forced vital capacity (FVC) was highest in swimmers (Mean z-score[95%CI]  = 1.16 [0.80, 1.51]), and close to or higher than reference values according to the Global Lung Initiative equation, across all sports. Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>) was higher than reference values in swimmers (0.48 [0.13, 0.84]), and ball game athletes (0.69 [0.41, 0.97]). Mean forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of FVC (FEF<sub>25–75</sub>), and/or FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC were lower than reference values in all endurance groups. BHR defined by ≤2 and ≤8 µmol methacholine was observed in respectively 50%–87% of swimmers, 25%–47% of cross-country skiers, 20%–53% of speed-skaters, 18%–36% of rowers/paddlers, and 0%–17% of the ball game athletes. Exercise-induced symptoms were common in all groups, most frequent in cross-country skiers (88%), swimmers (83%) and speed-skaters (81%).</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"volume\":\"23 8\",\"pages\":\"1480-1489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/17461391.2022.2113144\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1080/17461391.2022.2113144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1080/17461391.2022.2113144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是研究不同运动项目的优秀运动员的肺功能、支气管高反应性(BHR)和运动引起的呼吸道症状。挪威国家队运动员(30名游泳运动员、32名越野滑雪运动员、16名速滑运动员、11名赛艇运动员/桨运动员、17名手球运动员和23名足球运动员)完成了一份有效问卷,测量了呼出一氧化氮(FENO)、肺活量测定、甲胆酸激发(PD20met)和皮肤点刺试验。三个临界值定义了BHR;即PD20met≤2µmol,≤4µmol,≤8µmol。游泳运动员的平均强迫肺活量(FVC)最高(平均z-score[95%CI] = 1.16[0.80, 1.51]),根据全球肺倡议方程,在所有运动中,游泳运动员接近或高于参考值。游泳运动员(0.48[0.13,0.84])和球类运动员(0.69[0.41,0.97])的平均1 s用力呼气量(FEV1)高于参考值。在所有耐力组中,平均用力呼气流量在FVC的25- 75%之间(FEF25-75)和/或FEV1/FVC均低于参考值。50%-87%的游泳运动员、25%-47%的越野滑雪运动员、20%-53%的速滑运动员、18%-36%的赛艇运动员和0%-17%的球类运动员的BHR分别以≤2和≤8µmol的甲胆碱定义。运动引起的症状在所有组中都很常见,最常见的是越野滑雪运动员(88%)、游泳运动员(83%)和速滑运动员(81%)。与全球肺倡议(GLI)参考方程预测的参考值相比,游泳和球类运动员的平均FVC和FEV1更高。与此形成对比的是,除球类运动员外,所有运动项目的平均FEF25-75和/或FEV1/FVC均低于参考值。支气管高反应性(BHR)在游泳、越野滑雪、速滑和赛艇/划艇等优秀运动员中患病率较高,其中游泳运动员受影响最大。大多数优秀运动员报告运动引起的呼吸系统症状独立于肺功能或BHR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Differences in lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and respiratory health between elite athletes competing in different sports

Differences in lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and respiratory health between elite athletes competing in different sports

The aim of this study was to examine lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and exercise-induced respiratory symptoms in elite athletes performing different sports. Norwegian national-team athletes (30 swimmers, 32 cross-country skiers, 16 speed-skaters, 11 rowers/paddlers, 17 handball players and 23 soccer players) completed a validated questionnaire, measured exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), spirometry, methacholine provocation (PD20met) and skin prick test. Three cut-off levels defined BHR; i.e. PD20met ≤2 µmol, ≤4 µmol and ≤8 µmol. Mean forced vital capacity (FVC) was highest in swimmers (Mean z-score[95%CI]  = 1.16 [0.80, 1.51]), and close to or higher than reference values according to the Global Lung Initiative equation, across all sports. Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was higher than reference values in swimmers (0.48 [0.13, 0.84]), and ball game athletes (0.69 [0.41, 0.97]). Mean forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of FVC (FEF25–75), and/or FEV1/FVC were lower than reference values in all endurance groups. BHR defined by ≤2 and ≤8 µmol methacholine was observed in respectively 50%–87% of swimmers, 25%–47% of cross-country skiers, 20%–53% of speed-skaters, 18%–36% of rowers/paddlers, and 0%–17% of the ball game athletes. Exercise-induced symptoms were common in all groups, most frequent in cross-country skiers (88%), swimmers (83%) and speed-skaters (81%).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信