Kella Nivedita, Somnath Mukherjee, Satya Prakash, Ansuman Sahu, Debasish Mishra
{"title":"一名28岁印度奥迪亚孕妇疑似抗g抗体中排除抗d同种异体抗体。","authors":"Kella Nivedita, Somnath Mukherjee, Satya Prakash, Ansuman Sahu, Debasish Mishra","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmad067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Rh-D negative pregnancy is commonly associated with alloimmunization against D-antigen. It can be prevented by anti-D prophylaxis in pregnant patients with negative results on antibody screening. Hence, it is essential to exclude alloantibody-D in the presence of multiple alloantibodies. Anti-G antibody is formed after exposure to G antigen in neonate RBCs. Blood-group discrepancy was noted in reverse grouping, and antibody-screening results were positive in our case individual, a 28-year old Odiya Indian woman. We performed antibody identification on serum specimens from this patient, which revealed the pattern of anti-D + anti-C antibody specificity. Blood-group discrepancy was solved using rr (ce/ce)-phenotype pooled cells for reverse grouping. We identified anti-G antibodies by themselves without anti-D and anti-C after performing sequential adsorption of serum with r'r' (Ce/Ce) and R2R2 (DcE/DcE) group-O RBCs in the mother, who had rr phenotype and primigravida designation. After completing antibody screening at the first antenatal check-up, we recommended prophylactic anti-D for the mother in any future pregnancies she may have.</p>","PeriodicalId":17951,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e197-e200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The exclusion of anti-D alloantibody in a suspected anti-G antibody in a pregnant 28-year-old Odiya Indian woman.\",\"authors\":\"Kella Nivedita, Somnath Mukherjee, Satya Prakash, Ansuman Sahu, Debasish Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/labmed/lmad067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Rh-D negative pregnancy is commonly associated with alloimmunization against D-antigen. It can be prevented by anti-D prophylaxis in pregnant patients with negative results on antibody screening. Hence, it is essential to exclude alloantibody-D in the presence of multiple alloantibodies. Anti-G antibody is formed after exposure to G antigen in neonate RBCs. Blood-group discrepancy was noted in reverse grouping, and antibody-screening results were positive in our case individual, a 28-year old Odiya Indian woman. We performed antibody identification on serum specimens from this patient, which revealed the pattern of anti-D + anti-C antibody specificity. Blood-group discrepancy was solved using rr (ce/ce)-phenotype pooled cells for reverse grouping. We identified anti-G antibodies by themselves without anti-D and anti-C after performing sequential adsorption of serum with r'r' (Ce/Ce) and R2R2 (DcE/DcE) group-O RBCs in the mother, who had rr phenotype and primigravida designation. After completing antibody screening at the first antenatal check-up, we recommended prophylactic anti-D for the mother in any future pregnancies she may have.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e197-e200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmad067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmad067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The exclusion of anti-D alloantibody in a suspected anti-G antibody in a pregnant 28-year-old Odiya Indian woman.
The Rh-D negative pregnancy is commonly associated with alloimmunization against D-antigen. It can be prevented by anti-D prophylaxis in pregnant patients with negative results on antibody screening. Hence, it is essential to exclude alloantibody-D in the presence of multiple alloantibodies. Anti-G antibody is formed after exposure to G antigen in neonate RBCs. Blood-group discrepancy was noted in reverse grouping, and antibody-screening results were positive in our case individual, a 28-year old Odiya Indian woman. We performed antibody identification on serum specimens from this patient, which revealed the pattern of anti-D + anti-C antibody specificity. Blood-group discrepancy was solved using rr (ce/ce)-phenotype pooled cells for reverse grouping. We identified anti-G antibodies by themselves without anti-D and anti-C after performing sequential adsorption of serum with r'r' (Ce/Ce) and R2R2 (DcE/DcE) group-O RBCs in the mother, who had rr phenotype and primigravida designation. After completing antibody screening at the first antenatal check-up, we recommended prophylactic anti-D for the mother in any future pregnancies she may have.