[插管困难预测指标与Cormack的相关性]。

Maritza Domínguez-Pérez, Roxana Del Socorro González-Dzib
{"title":"[插管困难预测指标与Cormack的相关性]。","authors":"Maritza Domínguez-Pérez,&nbsp;Roxana Del Socorro González-Dzib","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than 600 people die each year in developed countries from complications at the time of orotracheal intubation. Studies have shown that all predictors used so far have low ability to predict difficult airway. When analyzing this ability, both clinical suspicion, indirect laryngoscopy and even the different individual examinations showed predictive values higher than 80%.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the concordance between the Predictive Index of Difficult Intubation (PIDI) and the Cormack regarding the diagnosis of difficult intubation in patients undergoing open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy under balanced general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Observational, prospective, cross-sectional, analytical concordance study, carried out in patients aged 18 to 60 who underwent open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The sample was probabilistic, the statistical analysis applied univariate and bivariate, specifically the Kappa index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 96 patients were analyzed; 77 were female with a mean age of 40.4 years. Said sample presented a PIDI of easy intubation in 75%, discreet difficulty in 21.9% and frank difficulty in 3.1%. After conventional direct laryngoscopy, 75% presented Cormack I, 16.7% presented Cormack II, 8.3% presented Cormack III. The bivariate analysis with the Kappa index statistic showed a value of 0.242.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is accepted the alternative hypothesis demonstrating that there is a correlation between the PIDI and the Cormack concerning the diagnosis of difficult intubation in patients undergoing open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy under balanced general anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":21419,"journal":{"name":"Revista médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","volume":"61 1","pages":"15-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b4/d0/04435117-61-1-15.PMC10395993.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Correlation between Predictive Index of Difficult Intubation and Cormack].\",\"authors\":\"Maritza Domínguez-Pérez,&nbsp;Roxana Del Socorro González-Dzib\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than 600 people die each year in developed countries from complications at the time of orotracheal intubation. Studies have shown that all predictors used so far have low ability to predict difficult airway. When analyzing this ability, both clinical suspicion, indirect laryngoscopy and even the different individual examinations showed predictive values higher than 80%.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the concordance between the Predictive Index of Difficult Intubation (PIDI) and the Cormack regarding the diagnosis of difficult intubation in patients undergoing open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy under balanced general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Observational, prospective, cross-sectional, analytical concordance study, carried out in patients aged 18 to 60 who underwent open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The sample was probabilistic, the statistical analysis applied univariate and bivariate, specifically the Kappa index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 96 patients were analyzed; 77 were female with a mean age of 40.4 years. Said sample presented a PIDI of easy intubation in 75%, discreet difficulty in 21.9% and frank difficulty in 3.1%. After conventional direct laryngoscopy, 75% presented Cormack I, 16.7% presented Cormack II, 8.3% presented Cormack III. The bivariate analysis with the Kappa index statistic showed a value of 0.242.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is accepted the alternative hypothesis demonstrating that there is a correlation between the PIDI and the Cormack concerning the diagnosis of difficult intubation in patients undergoing open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy under balanced general anesthesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"15-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b4/d0/04435117-61-1-15.PMC10395993.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在发达国家,每年有600多人死于气管插管时的并发症。研究表明,目前使用的所有预测指标预测气道困难的能力都很低。在分析这种能力时,无论是临床怀疑、间接喉镜检查,还是不同的个体检查,其预测值都在80%以上。目的:评价平衡全麻下开腹和腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者插管困难预测指数(PIDI)与Cormack诊断插管困难的一致性。材料和方法:观察性、前瞻性、横断面、分析性一致性研究,对18 - 60岁接受开放和腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者进行研究。样本是概率性的,统计分析应用单变量和双变量,特别是Kappa指数。结果:共分析96例患者;女性77例,平均年龄40.4岁。该样本的PIDI为插管容易占75%,谨慎困难占21.9%,坦率困难占3.1%。常规直接喉镜检查后,75%为Cormack I型,16.7%为Cormack II型,8.3%为Cormack III型。Kappa指数统计量的双变量分析结果为0.242。结论:PIDI与Cormack对平衡全麻下开腹和腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者插管困难的诊断有相关性,可接受择择假说。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

[Correlation between Predictive Index of Difficult Intubation and Cormack].

[Correlation between Predictive Index of Difficult Intubation and Cormack].

[Correlation between Predictive Index of Difficult Intubation and Cormack].

[Correlation between Predictive Index of Difficult Intubation and Cormack].

Background: More than 600 people die each year in developed countries from complications at the time of orotracheal intubation. Studies have shown that all predictors used so far have low ability to predict difficult airway. When analyzing this ability, both clinical suspicion, indirect laryngoscopy and even the different individual examinations showed predictive values higher than 80%.

Objective: To evaluate the concordance between the Predictive Index of Difficult Intubation (PIDI) and the Cormack regarding the diagnosis of difficult intubation in patients undergoing open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy under balanced general anesthesia.

Material and methods: Observational, prospective, cross-sectional, analytical concordance study, carried out in patients aged 18 to 60 who underwent open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The sample was probabilistic, the statistical analysis applied univariate and bivariate, specifically the Kappa index.

Results: A total of 96 patients were analyzed; 77 were female with a mean age of 40.4 years. Said sample presented a PIDI of easy intubation in 75%, discreet difficulty in 21.9% and frank difficulty in 3.1%. After conventional direct laryngoscopy, 75% presented Cormack I, 16.7% presented Cormack II, 8.3% presented Cormack III. The bivariate analysis with the Kappa index statistic showed a value of 0.242.

Conclusions: It is accepted the alternative hypothesis demonstrating that there is a correlation between the PIDI and the Cormack concerning the diagnosis of difficult intubation in patients undergoing open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy under balanced general anesthesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信