评估造影剂增强超声对偶发性局灶性肝脏病变患者工作流程的影响和资源意义。

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Megan O'Brien, Louisa Oliver, Nick Proctor, Maro Siakantari, Peter Cantin, Colin P Griffin, Ben Stenberg
{"title":"评估造影剂增强超声对偶发性局灶性肝脏病变患者工作流程的影响和资源意义。","authors":"Megan O'Brien,&nbsp;Louisa Oliver,&nbsp;Nick Proctor,&nbsp;Maro Siakantari,&nbsp;Peter Cantin,&nbsp;Colin P Griffin,&nbsp;Ben Stenberg","doi":"10.1177/20584601231183131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Focal liver lesions (FLL) are abnormal growths that require timely identification. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a cost-effective imaging modality for characterising FLL with similar sensitivity to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Despite being recommended by NICE, its adoption within the national health service (NHS) is limited due to low clinical demand, limited referral, and lack of knowledge.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the impact of CEUS on patients with incidental FLL and assess the resource implications of introducing CEUS as a diagnostic service within the NHS.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A patient flow review and cost-minimisation analysis were conducted. This involved a targeted literature review, NHS Trust stakeholder consultations, and development of a Microsoft Excel cost-minimisation model to explore potential value of CEUS use versus CT and MRI by episode. A scenario analysis of the base-case explored increasing CEUS use to 50% and 90%. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess how changes in assumptions impacted the model and the resulting cost estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model, comparing a world with and without CEUS, showed that current use (base-case: 5%) resulted in cost savings of £224,790/year. The sensitivity analysis indicated that regardless of changes to the assumptions, CEUS still resulted in cost savings to the NHS. By increasing CEUS use to 50% and 90%, cost savings of up to £2,247,894/year and £4,046,208/year could be achieved, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By standardising CEUS use for characterising FLL, substantial cost savings could be realised, whilst reducing wait times and expanding diagnostic capacity, thus preserving limited CT and MRI capacity for high-priority cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":72063,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/43/02/10.1177_20584601231183131.PMC10280539.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the impact and resource implications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound on workflow of patients with incidental focal liver lesions on the UK national health service.\",\"authors\":\"Megan O'Brien,&nbsp;Louisa Oliver,&nbsp;Nick Proctor,&nbsp;Maro Siakantari,&nbsp;Peter Cantin,&nbsp;Colin P Griffin,&nbsp;Ben Stenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20584601231183131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Focal liver lesions (FLL) are abnormal growths that require timely identification. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a cost-effective imaging modality for characterising FLL with similar sensitivity to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Despite being recommended by NICE, its adoption within the national health service (NHS) is limited due to low clinical demand, limited referral, and lack of knowledge.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the impact of CEUS on patients with incidental FLL and assess the resource implications of introducing CEUS as a diagnostic service within the NHS.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A patient flow review and cost-minimisation analysis were conducted. This involved a targeted literature review, NHS Trust stakeholder consultations, and development of a Microsoft Excel cost-minimisation model to explore potential value of CEUS use versus CT and MRI by episode. A scenario analysis of the base-case explored increasing CEUS use to 50% and 90%. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess how changes in assumptions impacted the model and the resulting cost estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model, comparing a world with and without CEUS, showed that current use (base-case: 5%) resulted in cost savings of £224,790/year. The sensitivity analysis indicated that regardless of changes to the assumptions, CEUS still resulted in cost savings to the NHS. By increasing CEUS use to 50% and 90%, cost savings of up to £2,247,894/year and £4,046,208/year could be achieved, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By standardising CEUS use for characterising FLL, substantial cost savings could be realised, whilst reducing wait times and expanding diagnostic capacity, thus preserving limited CT and MRI capacity for high-priority cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta radiologica open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/43/02/10.1177_20584601231183131.PMC10280539.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta radiologica open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20584601231183131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20584601231183131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:局灶性肝脏病变(FLL)是一种需要及时识别的异常生长。对比增强超声(CEUS)是一种具有成本效益的成像方式,用于表征FLL,其灵敏度与计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)相似。尽管NICE推荐了它,但由于临床需求低、转诊有限和缺乏知识,它在国家卫生服务(NHS)中的采用受到限制。目的:评估超声造影对偶发性肺水肿患者的影响,并评估在NHS中引入超声造影作为诊断服务的资源意义。材料和方法:进行了患者流程回顾和成本最小化分析。这包括有针对性的文献综述,NHS信托利益相关者咨询,以及开发Microsoft Excel成本最小化模型,以探讨超声造影与CT和MRI的潜在价值。对基本情况的场景分析探讨了将CEUS的使用率提高到50%和90%。进行敏感性分析以评估假设的变化如何影响模型和由此产生的成本估算。结果:该模型比较了有和没有CEUS的世界,显示当前使用(基本情况:5%)每年可节省成本224,790英镑。敏感性分析表明,无论假设如何改变,CEUS仍然为NHS节省了成本。通过将CEUS的使用率提高到50%和90%,每年可分别节省高达2,247,894英镑和4,046,208英镑的成本。结论:通过标准化超声造影用于诊断FLL,可以实现大量的成本节约,同时减少等待时间和扩大诊断能力,从而保留有限的CT和MRI对高优先级病例的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing the impact and resource implications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound on workflow of patients with incidental focal liver lesions on the UK national health service.

Assessing the impact and resource implications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound on workflow of patients with incidental focal liver lesions on the UK national health service.

Assessing the impact and resource implications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound on workflow of patients with incidental focal liver lesions on the UK national health service.

Assessing the impact and resource implications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound on workflow of patients with incidental focal liver lesions on the UK national health service.

Background: Focal liver lesions (FLL) are abnormal growths that require timely identification. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a cost-effective imaging modality for characterising FLL with similar sensitivity to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Despite being recommended by NICE, its adoption within the national health service (NHS) is limited due to low clinical demand, limited referral, and lack of knowledge.

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of CEUS on patients with incidental FLL and assess the resource implications of introducing CEUS as a diagnostic service within the NHS.

Material and methods: A patient flow review and cost-minimisation analysis were conducted. This involved a targeted literature review, NHS Trust stakeholder consultations, and development of a Microsoft Excel cost-minimisation model to explore potential value of CEUS use versus CT and MRI by episode. A scenario analysis of the base-case explored increasing CEUS use to 50% and 90%. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess how changes in assumptions impacted the model and the resulting cost estimates.

Results: The model, comparing a world with and without CEUS, showed that current use (base-case: 5%) resulted in cost savings of £224,790/year. The sensitivity analysis indicated that regardless of changes to the assumptions, CEUS still resulted in cost savings to the NHS. By increasing CEUS use to 50% and 90%, cost savings of up to £2,247,894/year and £4,046,208/year could be achieved, respectively.

Conclusion: By standardising CEUS use for characterising FLL, substantial cost savings could be realised, whilst reducing wait times and expanding diagnostic capacity, thus preserving limited CT and MRI capacity for high-priority cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信