药品和非药品商品的捐赠效应和时间折扣。

IF 3.3 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Sean D. Regnier , Mark J. Rzeszutek , Justin C. Strickland , Thomas P. Shellenberg , William W. Stoops
{"title":"药品和非药品商品的捐赠效应和时间折扣。","authors":"Sean D. Regnier ,&nbsp;Mark J. Rzeszutek ,&nbsp;Justin C. Strickland ,&nbsp;Thomas P. Shellenberg ,&nbsp;William W. Stoops","doi":"10.1016/j.pbb.2023.173638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Despite a rich history of behavioral economic research on substance use there remains a need for further exploration of behavioral mechanisms that may underlie the etiology or persistence of substance use disorder. The purpose of this study was to measure the association between delay discounting and the endowment effect in people who smoke cigarettes, use cocaine, and controls, using online crowdsourcing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants were categorized to a cocaine group (<em>n</em> = 36), cigarette group (<em>n</em> = 48), or control group (<em>n</em> = 47) based on recent reported drug use. Based on group, participants completed up to three delay discounting tasks (i.e., money, cigarettes and cocaine), an endowment effect task for multiple commodities, and other questionnaires.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants in the cocaine and cigarette group demonstrated an increased rate in discounting for money compared to controls. Participants in the cocaine group had a less pronounced endowment effect for beer, compared to controls, as suggested by willingness to accept less to sell beer. A significant negative association was found between endowment ratios for non-drug commodities and delay discounting for cigarettes, but not monetary or cocaine delay discounting, indicating an inconsistent relationship between the two measures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results support prior research demonstrating a relationship between cocaine and cigarette use and delay discounting and extend that work by measuring the association between delay discounting and the endowment effect. Future research should include both loss aversion and endowment effect tasks and compare their relationship with delay discounting among people that use drugs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19893,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior","volume":"232 ","pages":"Article 173638"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The endowment effect and temporal discounting of drug and non-drug commodities\",\"authors\":\"Sean D. Regnier ,&nbsp;Mark J. Rzeszutek ,&nbsp;Justin C. Strickland ,&nbsp;Thomas P. Shellenberg ,&nbsp;William W. Stoops\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pbb.2023.173638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Despite a rich history of behavioral economic research on substance use there remains a need for further exploration of behavioral mechanisms that may underlie the etiology or persistence of substance use disorder. The purpose of this study was to measure the association between delay discounting and the endowment effect in people who smoke cigarettes, use cocaine, and controls, using online crowdsourcing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants were categorized to a cocaine group (<em>n</em> = 36), cigarette group (<em>n</em> = 48), or control group (<em>n</em> = 47) based on recent reported drug use. Based on group, participants completed up to three delay discounting tasks (i.e., money, cigarettes and cocaine), an endowment effect task for multiple commodities, and other questionnaires.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants in the cocaine and cigarette group demonstrated an increased rate in discounting for money compared to controls. Participants in the cocaine group had a less pronounced endowment effect for beer, compared to controls, as suggested by willingness to accept less to sell beer. A significant negative association was found between endowment ratios for non-drug commodities and delay discounting for cigarettes, but not monetary or cocaine delay discounting, indicating an inconsistent relationship between the two measures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results support prior research demonstrating a relationship between cocaine and cigarette use and delay discounting and extend that work by measuring the association between delay discounting and the endowment effect. Future research should include both loss aversion and endowment effect tasks and compare their relationship with delay discounting among people that use drugs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"232 \",\"pages\":\"Article 173638\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091305723001259\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091305723001259","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管对物质使用的行为经济学研究有着丰富的历史,但仍有必要进一步探索可能是物质使用障碍病因或持续存在的行为机制。这项研究的目的是通过在线众包来衡量吸烟、使用可卡因和对照组的延迟折扣与捐赠效应之间的关系。方法:根据最近报告的药物使用情况,将参与者分为可卡因组(n=36)、香烟组(n=48)或对照组(n=47)。基于小组,参与者最多完成三项延迟折扣任务(即金钱、香烟和可卡因)、多种商品的捐赠效应任务和其他问卷。结果:与对照组相比,可卡因和香烟组的参与者表现出更高的货币折扣率。与对照组相比,可卡因组的参与者对啤酒的捐赠效应不那么明显,这表明他们愿意接受更少的啤酒销售。非毒品商品的捐赠比率与香烟的延迟折扣之间存在显著的负相关,但与货币或可卡因的延迟折扣无关,这表明这两种指标之间的关系不一致。结论:这些结果支持了先前的研究,证明了可卡因和香烟使用以及延迟折扣之间的关系,并通过测量延迟折扣和捐赠效应之间的关联来扩展这项工作。未来的研究应该包括损失厌恶和捐赠效应任务,并比较它们与药物使用者延迟折扣的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The endowment effect and temporal discounting of drug and non-drug commodities

Objectives

Despite a rich history of behavioral economic research on substance use there remains a need for further exploration of behavioral mechanisms that may underlie the etiology or persistence of substance use disorder. The purpose of this study was to measure the association between delay discounting and the endowment effect in people who smoke cigarettes, use cocaine, and controls, using online crowdsourcing.

Methods

Participants were categorized to a cocaine group (n = 36), cigarette group (n = 48), or control group (n = 47) based on recent reported drug use. Based on group, participants completed up to three delay discounting tasks (i.e., money, cigarettes and cocaine), an endowment effect task for multiple commodities, and other questionnaires.

Results

Participants in the cocaine and cigarette group demonstrated an increased rate in discounting for money compared to controls. Participants in the cocaine group had a less pronounced endowment effect for beer, compared to controls, as suggested by willingness to accept less to sell beer. A significant negative association was found between endowment ratios for non-drug commodities and delay discounting for cigarettes, but not monetary or cocaine delay discounting, indicating an inconsistent relationship between the two measures.

Conclusions

These results support prior research demonstrating a relationship between cocaine and cigarette use and delay discounting and extend that work by measuring the association between delay discounting and the endowment effect. Future research should include both loss aversion and endowment effect tasks and compare their relationship with delay discounting among people that use drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior publishes original reports in the areas of pharmacology and biochemistry in which the primary emphasis and theoretical context are behavioral. Contributions may involve clinical, preclinical, or basic research. Purely biochemical or toxicology studies will not be published. Papers describing the behavioral effects of novel drugs in models of psychiatric, neurological and cognitive disorders, and central pain must include a positive control unless the paper is on a disease where such a drug is not available yet. Papers focusing on physiological processes (e.g., peripheral pain mechanisms, body temperature regulation, seizure activity) are not accepted as we would like to retain the focus of Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior on behavior and its interaction with the biochemistry and neurochemistry of the central nervous system. Papers describing the effects of plant materials are generally not considered, unless the active ingredients are studied, the extraction method is well described, the doses tested are known, and clear and definite experimental evidence on the mechanism of action of the active ingredients is provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信