锥形束计算机断层扫描对不同尺寸条形穿孔和分叉穿孔诊断准确性的评估。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Oral Radiology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-24 DOI:10.1007/s11282-023-00681-y
Zahra Ghoncheh, Hanieh Kaviani, Sara Soleimani, Shifteh Nasri, Fatemeh Malekpour, Farzaneh Afkhami
{"title":"锥形束计算机断层扫描对不同尺寸条形穿孔和分叉穿孔诊断准确性的评估。","authors":"Zahra Ghoncheh,&nbsp;Hanieh Kaviani,&nbsp;Sara Soleimani,&nbsp;Shifteh Nasri,&nbsp;Fatemeh Malekpour,&nbsp;Farzaneh Afkhami","doi":"10.1007/s11282-023-00681-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Root perforation is an adverse event that may accidentally occur during root canal treatment and can adversely affect the treatment plan and tooth prognosis. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for detecting the strip and furcal perforations with different sizes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The mesiolingual canals of 155 extracted human mandibular first molars were instrumented and randomly divided into four experimental groups and one control group (n = 31). Furcal (in the pulp chamber floor) and strip perforations with 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 mm in diameter were manually created. The teeth were randomly mounted in bovine ribs and scanned using CBCT. Two radiologists unaware of the study groups observed the images and reported the greatest perforation diameter. The inter-observer agreements were calculated. The diagnostic accuracy was compared for furcal and strip perforations with different sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inter-observer agreement for detecting furcal and strip perforations with different sizes were good. The diagnostic accuracy was 100% for the absence of perforation in each group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CBCT can detect the absence of perforation with high accuracy. The diagnostic accuracy of CBCT in the presence of strip and furcal perforation with different sizes was not significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":56103,"journal":{"name":"Oral Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of strip and furcal perforations in different sizes by cone beam computed tomography.\",\"authors\":\"Zahra Ghoncheh,&nbsp;Hanieh Kaviani,&nbsp;Sara Soleimani,&nbsp;Shifteh Nasri,&nbsp;Fatemeh Malekpour,&nbsp;Farzaneh Afkhami\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11282-023-00681-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Root perforation is an adverse event that may accidentally occur during root canal treatment and can adversely affect the treatment plan and tooth prognosis. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for detecting the strip and furcal perforations with different sizes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The mesiolingual canals of 155 extracted human mandibular first molars were instrumented and randomly divided into four experimental groups and one control group (n = 31). Furcal (in the pulp chamber floor) and strip perforations with 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 mm in diameter were manually created. The teeth were randomly mounted in bovine ribs and scanned using CBCT. Two radiologists unaware of the study groups observed the images and reported the greatest perforation diameter. The inter-observer agreements were calculated. The diagnostic accuracy was compared for furcal and strip perforations with different sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inter-observer agreement for detecting furcal and strip perforations with different sizes were good. The diagnostic accuracy was 100% for the absence of perforation in each group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CBCT can detect the absence of perforation with high accuracy. The diagnostic accuracy of CBCT in the presence of strip and furcal perforation with different sizes was not significant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-023-00681-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-023-00681-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:根管穿孔是根管治疗过程中可能意外发生的不良事件,会对治疗计划和牙齿预后产生不利影响。本研究旨在评估锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)检测不同尺寸的条状和分叉穿孔的准确性。方法:对155颗拔除的下颌第一磨牙的近中根管进行根管内固定,并将其随机分为4个实验组和1个对照组(n = 31)。手动创建直径为0.5、1、1.5和2mm的Furcal(在纸浆室底板中)和条形穿孔。将牙齿随机安装在牛肋骨上,并使用CBCT进行扫描。两名不了解研究组的放射科医生观察了图像,并报告了最大的穿孔直径。计算了观察员之间的协议。比较不同大小的分叉穿孔和带状穿孔的诊断准确性。结果:观察者对不同大小的分叉穿孔和带状穿孔的检测一致性良好。各组无穿孔的诊断准确率为100%。结论:CBCT可准确检测无穿孔。CBCT在存在不同大小的条状和分叉穿孔时的诊断准确性并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of strip and furcal perforations in different sizes by cone beam computed tomography.

Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of strip and furcal perforations in different sizes by cone beam computed tomography.

Objective: Root perforation is an adverse event that may accidentally occur during root canal treatment and can adversely affect the treatment plan and tooth prognosis. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for detecting the strip and furcal perforations with different sizes.

Methods: The mesiolingual canals of 155 extracted human mandibular first molars were instrumented and randomly divided into four experimental groups and one control group (n = 31). Furcal (in the pulp chamber floor) and strip perforations with 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 mm in diameter were manually created. The teeth were randomly mounted in bovine ribs and scanned using CBCT. Two radiologists unaware of the study groups observed the images and reported the greatest perforation diameter. The inter-observer agreements were calculated. The diagnostic accuracy was compared for furcal and strip perforations with different sizes.

Results: The inter-observer agreement for detecting furcal and strip perforations with different sizes were good. The diagnostic accuracy was 100% for the absence of perforation in each group.

Conclusions: CBCT can detect the absence of perforation with high accuracy. The diagnostic accuracy of CBCT in the presence of strip and furcal perforation with different sizes was not significant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oral Radiology
Oral Radiology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
87
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official English-language journal of the Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and the Asian Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Oral Radiology is intended to be a forum for international collaboration in head and neck diagnostic imaging and all related fields. Oral Radiology features cutting-edge research papers, review articles, case reports, and technical notes from both the clinical and experimental fields. As membership in the Society is not a prerequisite, contributions are welcome from researchers and clinicians worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信