后生动物多细胞性的起源:一个潜在的微生物黑天鹅事件。

IF 8.5 1区 生物学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Annual review of microbiology Pub Date : 2023-09-15 Epub Date: 2023-07-05 DOI:10.1146/annurev-micro-032421-120023
Iñaki Ruiz-Trillo, Koryu Kin, Elena Casacuberta
{"title":"后生动物多细胞性的起源:一个潜在的微生物黑天鹅事件。","authors":"Iñaki Ruiz-Trillo,&nbsp;Koryu Kin,&nbsp;Elena Casacuberta","doi":"10.1146/annurev-micro-032421-120023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The emergence of animals from their unicellular ancestors is a major evolutionary event. Thanks to the study of diverse close unicellular relatives of animals, we now have a better grasp of what the unicellular ancestor of animals was like. However, it is unclear how that unicellular ancestor of animals became the first animals. To explain this transition, two popular theories, the choanoblastaea and the synzoospore, have been proposed. We will revise and expose the flaws in these two theories while showing that, due to the limits of our current knowledge, the origin of animals is a biological black swan event. As such, the origin of animals defies retrospective explanations. Therefore, we should be extra careful not to fall for confirmation biases based on few data and, instead, embrace this uncertainty and be open to alternative scenarios. With the aim to broaden the potential explanations on how animals emerged, we here propose two novel and alternative scenarios. In any case, to find the answer to how animals evolved, additional data will be required, as will the hunt for microscopic creatures that are closely related to animals but have not yet been sampled and studied.</p>","PeriodicalId":7946,"journal":{"name":"Annual review of microbiology","volume":"77 ","pages":"499-516"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Origin of Metazoan Multicellularity: A Potential Microbial Black Swan Event.\",\"authors\":\"Iñaki Ruiz-Trillo,&nbsp;Koryu Kin,&nbsp;Elena Casacuberta\",\"doi\":\"10.1146/annurev-micro-032421-120023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The emergence of animals from their unicellular ancestors is a major evolutionary event. Thanks to the study of diverse close unicellular relatives of animals, we now have a better grasp of what the unicellular ancestor of animals was like. However, it is unclear how that unicellular ancestor of animals became the first animals. To explain this transition, two popular theories, the choanoblastaea and the synzoospore, have been proposed. We will revise and expose the flaws in these two theories while showing that, due to the limits of our current knowledge, the origin of animals is a biological black swan event. As such, the origin of animals defies retrospective explanations. Therefore, we should be extra careful not to fall for confirmation biases based on few data and, instead, embrace this uncertainty and be open to alternative scenarios. With the aim to broaden the potential explanations on how animals emerged, we here propose two novel and alternative scenarios. In any case, to find the answer to how animals evolved, additional data will be required, as will the hunt for microscopic creatures that are closely related to animals but have not yet been sampled and studied.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual review of microbiology\",\"volume\":\"77 \",\"pages\":\"499-516\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual review of microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-032421-120023\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual review of microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-032421-120023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

动物从单细胞祖先那里出现是一个重大的进化事件。由于对动物的各种单细胞近亲的研究,我们现在对动物的单细胞祖先有了更好的了解。然而,尚不清楚动物的单细胞祖先是如何成为第一批动物的。为了解释这种转变,人们提出了两种流行的理论,choanoblastaea和synzospore。我们将修正并揭露这两种理论中的缺陷,同时表明,由于我们目前知识的限制,动物的起源是一个生物黑天鹅事件。因此,动物的起源难以追溯。因此,我们应该格外小心,不要陷入基于少数数据的确认偏差,相反,要接受这种不确定性,并对其他情况持开放态度。为了拓宽对动物如何出现的潜在解释,我们在这里提出了两种新颖的替代场景。无论如何,要想找到动物进化的答案,还需要额外的数据,寻找与动物关系密切但尚未采样和研究的微观生物也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Origin of Metazoan Multicellularity: A Potential Microbial Black Swan Event.

The emergence of animals from their unicellular ancestors is a major evolutionary event. Thanks to the study of diverse close unicellular relatives of animals, we now have a better grasp of what the unicellular ancestor of animals was like. However, it is unclear how that unicellular ancestor of animals became the first animals. To explain this transition, two popular theories, the choanoblastaea and the synzoospore, have been proposed. We will revise and expose the flaws in these two theories while showing that, due to the limits of our current knowledge, the origin of animals is a biological black swan event. As such, the origin of animals defies retrospective explanations. Therefore, we should be extra careful not to fall for confirmation biases based on few data and, instead, embrace this uncertainty and be open to alternative scenarios. With the aim to broaden the potential explanations on how animals emerged, we here propose two novel and alternative scenarios. In any case, to find the answer to how animals evolved, additional data will be required, as will the hunt for microscopic creatures that are closely related to animals but have not yet been sampled and studied.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annual review of microbiology
Annual review of microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Annual Review of Microbiology is a Medical and Microbiology Journal and published by Annual Reviews Inc. The Annual Review of Microbiology, in publication since 1947, covers significant developments in the field of microbiology, encompassing bacteria, archaea, viruses, and unicellular eukaryotes. The current volume of this journal has been converted from gated to open access through Annual Reviews' Subscribe to Open program, with all articles published under a CC BY license. The Impact Factor of Annual Review of Microbiology is 10.242 (2024) Impact factor. The Annual Review of Microbiology Journal is Indexed with Pubmed, Scopus, UGC (University Grants Commission).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信