使用随机数据的精神药理学干预的剂量效应荟萃分析。

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Tasnim Hamza, Toshi A Furukawa, Nicola Orsini, Andrea Cipriani, Georgia Salanti
{"title":"使用随机数据的精神药理学干预的剂量效应荟萃分析。","authors":"Tasnim Hamza,&nbsp;Toshi A Furukawa,&nbsp;Nicola Orsini,&nbsp;Andrea Cipriani,&nbsp;Georgia Salanti","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2021-300278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current practice in meta-analysis of the effects of psychopharmacological interventions ignors the administered dose or restricts the analysis in a dose range. This may introduce unnecessary uncertainty and heterogeneity. Methods have been developed to integrate the dose-effect models in meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe the two-stage and the one-stage models to conduct a dose-effect meta-analysis using common or random effects methods. We illustrate the methods on a dataset of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants. The dataset comprises 60 randomised controlled trials. The dose-effect is measured on an odds ratio scale and is modelled using restricted cubic splines to detect departure from linearity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The estimated summary curve indicates that the probability of response increases up to 30 mg/day of fluoxetine-equivalent which results in reaching 50% probability to respond. Beyond 40 mg/day, no further increase in the response is observed. The one-stage model includes all studies, resulting in slightly less uncertainty than the two-stage model where only part of the data is analysed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The dose-effect meta-analysis enables clinicians to understand how the effect of a drug changes as a function of its dose. Such analysis should be conducted in practice using the one-stage model that incorporates evidence from all available studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231575/pdf/ebmental-2021-300278.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose-effect meta-analysis for psychopharmacological interventions using randomised data.\",\"authors\":\"Tasnim Hamza,&nbsp;Toshi A Furukawa,&nbsp;Nicola Orsini,&nbsp;Andrea Cipriani,&nbsp;Georgia Salanti\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ebmental-2021-300278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current practice in meta-analysis of the effects of psychopharmacological interventions ignors the administered dose or restricts the analysis in a dose range. This may introduce unnecessary uncertainty and heterogeneity. Methods have been developed to integrate the dose-effect models in meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe the two-stage and the one-stage models to conduct a dose-effect meta-analysis using common or random effects methods. We illustrate the methods on a dataset of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants. The dataset comprises 60 randomised controlled trials. The dose-effect is measured on an odds ratio scale and is modelled using restricted cubic splines to detect departure from linearity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The estimated summary curve indicates that the probability of response increases up to 30 mg/day of fluoxetine-equivalent which results in reaching 50% probability to respond. Beyond 40 mg/day, no further increase in the response is observed. The one-stage model includes all studies, resulting in slightly less uncertainty than the two-stage model where only part of the data is analysed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The dose-effect meta-analysis enables clinicians to understand how the effect of a drug changes as a function of its dose. Such analysis should be conducted in practice using the one-stage model that incorporates evidence from all available studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231575/pdf/ebmental-2021-300278.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2021-300278\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2021-300278","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:目前对精神药理学干预效果的荟萃分析忽略了给药剂量或将分析限制在剂量范围内。这可能会引入不必要的不确定性和异质性。已经开发了将剂量效应模型整合到meta分析中的方法。方法:我们描述了两阶段模型和一阶段模型,使用常见或随机效应方法进行剂量效应荟萃分析。我们在选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂抗抑郁药的数据集上说明了方法。数据集包括60个随机对照试验。剂量效应在比值比尺度上测量,并使用受限三次样条进行建模以检测偏离线性。结果:估计的汇总曲线表明,当氟西汀当量达到30 mg/d时,反应概率增加,达到50%的反应概率。超过40毫克/天,没有观察到反应进一步增加。单阶段模型包括所有的研究,其不确定性比只分析部分数据的两阶段模型略小。结论:剂量效应荟萃分析使临床医生能够了解药物的效果如何随着剂量的变化而变化。这种分析应在实践中使用纳入所有现有研究证据的单阶段模型进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dose-effect meta-analysis for psychopharmacological interventions using randomised data.

Dose-effect meta-analysis for psychopharmacological interventions using randomised data.

Dose-effect meta-analysis for psychopharmacological interventions using randomised data.

Objective: The current practice in meta-analysis of the effects of psychopharmacological interventions ignors the administered dose or restricts the analysis in a dose range. This may introduce unnecessary uncertainty and heterogeneity. Methods have been developed to integrate the dose-effect models in meta-analysis.

Methods: We describe the two-stage and the one-stage models to conduct a dose-effect meta-analysis using common or random effects methods. We illustrate the methods on a dataset of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants. The dataset comprises 60 randomised controlled trials. The dose-effect is measured on an odds ratio scale and is modelled using restricted cubic splines to detect departure from linearity.

Results: The estimated summary curve indicates that the probability of response increases up to 30 mg/day of fluoxetine-equivalent which results in reaching 50% probability to respond. Beyond 40 mg/day, no further increase in the response is observed. The one-stage model includes all studies, resulting in slightly less uncertainty than the two-stage model where only part of the data is analysed.

Conclusions: The dose-effect meta-analysis enables clinicians to understand how the effect of a drug changes as a function of its dose. Such analysis should be conducted in practice using the one-stage model that incorporates evidence from all available studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Mental Health alerts clinicians to important advances in treatment, diagnosis, aetiology, prognosis, continuing education, economic evaluation and qualitative research in mental health. Published by the British Psychological Society, the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the BMJ Publishing Group the journal surveys a wide range of international medical journals applying strict criteria for the quality and validity of research. Clinicians assess the relevance of the best studies and the key details of these essential studies are presented in a succinct, informative abstract with an expert commentary on its clinical application.Evidence-Based Mental Health is a multidisciplinary, quarterly publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信