Ita Fitzgerald, Jean O'Connell, Dolores Keating, Caroline Hynes, Stephen McWilliams, Erin K Crowley
{"title":"二甲双胍在治疗成人精神病患者抗精神病药物引起的体重增加中的作用:采用GRADE方法制定首个循证指南。","authors":"Ita Fitzgerald, Jean O'Connell, Dolores Keating, Caroline Hynes, Stephen McWilliams, Erin K Crowley","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2021-300291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adjunctive metformin is the most well-studied intervention in the pharmacological management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG). Although a relatively unaddressed area, among guidelines recommending consideration of metformin, prescribing information that would facilitate its applied use by clinicians, for example, provision of a dose titration schedule is absent. Moreover, recommendations differ regarding metformin's place in the hierarchy of management options. Both represent significant barriers to the applied, evidence-based use of metformin for this indication.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To produce a guideline solely dedicated to the optimised use of metformin in AIWG management, using internationally endorsed guideline methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A list of guideline key health questions (KHQs) was produced. It was agreed that individual recommendations would be 'adopted or adapted' from current guidelines and/or developed de novo, in the case of unanswered questions. A systematic literature review (2008-2020) was undertaken to identify published guidelines and supporting (or more recent) research evidence. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II tool, A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) assessment,and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, where appropriate. Assessment of evidence certainty and recommendation development was undertaken using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We confirmed that no published guideline-of appropriate quality, solely dedicated to the use of metformin to manage AIWG was available. Recommendations located within other guidelines inadequately addressed our KHQs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All 11 recommendations and 7 supporting good practice developed here were formulated de novo.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>These recommendations build on the number and quality of recommendations in this area, and facilitate the optimised use of metformin when managing AIWG.</p>","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"15-22"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788031/pdf/","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metformin in the management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain in adults with psychosis: development of the first evidence-based guideline using GRADE methodology.\",\"authors\":\"Ita Fitzgerald, Jean O'Connell, Dolores Keating, Caroline Hynes, Stephen McWilliams, Erin K Crowley\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ebmental-2021-300291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adjunctive metformin is the most well-studied intervention in the pharmacological management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG). Although a relatively unaddressed area, among guidelines recommending consideration of metformin, prescribing information that would facilitate its applied use by clinicians, for example, provision of a dose titration schedule is absent. Moreover, recommendations differ regarding metformin's place in the hierarchy of management options. Both represent significant barriers to the applied, evidence-based use of metformin for this indication.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To produce a guideline solely dedicated to the optimised use of metformin in AIWG management, using internationally endorsed guideline methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A list of guideline key health questions (KHQs) was produced. It was agreed that individual recommendations would be 'adopted or adapted' from current guidelines and/or developed de novo, in the case of unanswered questions. A systematic literature review (2008-2020) was undertaken to identify published guidelines and supporting (or more recent) research evidence. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II tool, A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) assessment,and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, where appropriate. Assessment of evidence certainty and recommendation development was undertaken using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We confirmed that no published guideline-of appropriate quality, solely dedicated to the use of metformin to manage AIWG was available. Recommendations located within other guidelines inadequately addressed our KHQs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All 11 recommendations and 7 supporting good practice developed here were formulated de novo.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>These recommendations build on the number and quality of recommendations in this area, and facilitate the optimised use of metformin when managing AIWG.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"15-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788031/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2021-300291\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2021-300291","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Metformin in the management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain in adults with psychosis: development of the first evidence-based guideline using GRADE methodology.
Background: Adjunctive metformin is the most well-studied intervention in the pharmacological management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG). Although a relatively unaddressed area, among guidelines recommending consideration of metformin, prescribing information that would facilitate its applied use by clinicians, for example, provision of a dose titration schedule is absent. Moreover, recommendations differ regarding metformin's place in the hierarchy of management options. Both represent significant barriers to the applied, evidence-based use of metformin for this indication.
Objective: To produce a guideline solely dedicated to the optimised use of metformin in AIWG management, using internationally endorsed guideline methodology.
Methods: A list of guideline key health questions (KHQs) was produced. It was agreed that individual recommendations would be 'adopted or adapted' from current guidelines and/or developed de novo, in the case of unanswered questions. A systematic literature review (2008-2020) was undertaken to identify published guidelines and supporting (or more recent) research evidence. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II tool, A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) assessment,and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, where appropriate. Assessment of evidence certainty and recommendation development was undertaken using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.
Findings: We confirmed that no published guideline-of appropriate quality, solely dedicated to the use of metformin to manage AIWG was available. Recommendations located within other guidelines inadequately addressed our KHQs.
Conclusion: All 11 recommendations and 7 supporting good practice developed here were formulated de novo.
Clinical implications: These recommendations build on the number and quality of recommendations in this area, and facilitate the optimised use of metformin when managing AIWG.
期刊介绍:
Evidence-Based Mental Health alerts clinicians to important advances in treatment, diagnosis, aetiology, prognosis, continuing education, economic evaluation and qualitative research in mental health. Published by the British Psychological Society, the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the BMJ Publishing Group the journal surveys a wide range of international medical journals applying strict criteria for the quality and validity of research. Clinicians assess the relevance of the best studies and the key details of these essential studies are presented in a succinct, informative abstract with an expert commentary on its clinical application.Evidence-Based Mental Health is a multidisciplinary, quarterly publication.