Matthew T Roberts, Farhad Shokraneh, Yanli Sun, Maddie Groom, Clive E Adams
{"title":"精神分裂症患者心理治疗干预的分类:诺丁汉心理治疗分类的发展。","authors":"Matthew T Roberts, Farhad Shokraneh, Yanli Sun, Maddie Groom, Clive E Adams","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2020-300151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, there is no accepted system for the classification of psychotherapies for application within systematic reviews. The creation of anuncomplicated, understandable and practical classification system is neccessary for conducting reliable systematic reviews.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To devise a system for classification of psychotherapy interventions-for use, initially, in systematic reviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cochrane Schizophrenia's Register used as the source of randomised controlled trial. After being piloted and refined at least twice, finally we applied it to all relevant trials within the register. Basic statistical data already held within the register were extracted and used to calculate the distribution of schizophrenia research by form of psychotherapy.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The final classification system consisted of six definable broad 'boughs' two of which were further subdivided into 'branches'. The taxonomy accommodated all psychotherapy interventions described in the register. Of the initial 1645 intervention categories within the register, after careful recoding, 539 (33%) were psychotherapies (234 coded as 'Thought/Action' (cognitive & behavioural)-1495 studies; 135 'Cognitive Functioning'-652 studies; 113 'Social'-684 studies; 55 'Humanistic'-272 studies; 23 'Psychoanalytic/dynamic'-40 studies; and 63 'Other'-387 studies). For people with schizophrenia, across categories, the average size of psychotherapy trial is small (107) but there are notable and important exceptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We reported a practical method for categorising psychotherapy interventions in evaluative studies with applications beyond schizophrenia. A move towards consensus on the classification and reporting of psychotherapies is needed.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>This classification can aid clinicians, clinical practice guideline developers, and evidence synthesis experts to recognise and compare the interventions from same or different classes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":"24 2","pages":"62-69"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231480/pdf/ebmental-2020-300151.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification of psychotherapy interventions for people with schizophrenia: development of the Nottingham Classification of Psychotherapies.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew T Roberts, Farhad Shokraneh, Yanli Sun, Maddie Groom, Clive E Adams\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ebmental-2020-300151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, there is no accepted system for the classification of psychotherapies for application within systematic reviews. The creation of anuncomplicated, understandable and practical classification system is neccessary for conducting reliable systematic reviews.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To devise a system for classification of psychotherapy interventions-for use, initially, in systematic reviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cochrane Schizophrenia's Register used as the source of randomised controlled trial. After being piloted and refined at least twice, finally we applied it to all relevant trials within the register. Basic statistical data already held within the register were extracted and used to calculate the distribution of schizophrenia research by form of psychotherapy.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The final classification system consisted of six definable broad 'boughs' two of which were further subdivided into 'branches'. The taxonomy accommodated all psychotherapy interventions described in the register. Of the initial 1645 intervention categories within the register, after careful recoding, 539 (33%) were psychotherapies (234 coded as 'Thought/Action' (cognitive & behavioural)-1495 studies; 135 'Cognitive Functioning'-652 studies; 113 'Social'-684 studies; 55 'Humanistic'-272 studies; 23 'Psychoanalytic/dynamic'-40 studies; and 63 'Other'-387 studies). For people with schizophrenia, across categories, the average size of psychotherapy trial is small (107) but there are notable and important exceptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We reported a practical method for categorising psychotherapy interventions in evaluative studies with applications beyond schizophrenia. A move towards consensus on the classification and reporting of psychotherapies is needed.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>This classification can aid clinicians, clinical practice guideline developers, and evidence synthesis experts to recognise and compare the interventions from same or different classes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"24 2\",\"pages\":\"62-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231480/pdf/ebmental-2020-300151.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2020-300151\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2020-300151","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Classification of psychotherapy interventions for people with schizophrenia: development of the Nottingham Classification of Psychotherapies.
Background: Currently, there is no accepted system for the classification of psychotherapies for application within systematic reviews. The creation of anuncomplicated, understandable and practical classification system is neccessary for conducting reliable systematic reviews.
Objective: To devise a system for classification of psychotherapy interventions-for use, initially, in systematic reviews.
Methods: Cochrane Schizophrenia's Register used as the source of randomised controlled trial. After being piloted and refined at least twice, finally we applied it to all relevant trials within the register. Basic statistical data already held within the register were extracted and used to calculate the distribution of schizophrenia research by form of psychotherapy.
Findings: The final classification system consisted of six definable broad 'boughs' two of which were further subdivided into 'branches'. The taxonomy accommodated all psychotherapy interventions described in the register. Of the initial 1645 intervention categories within the register, after careful recoding, 539 (33%) were psychotherapies (234 coded as 'Thought/Action' (cognitive & behavioural)-1495 studies; 135 'Cognitive Functioning'-652 studies; 113 'Social'-684 studies; 55 'Humanistic'-272 studies; 23 'Psychoanalytic/dynamic'-40 studies; and 63 'Other'-387 studies). For people with schizophrenia, across categories, the average size of psychotherapy trial is small (107) but there are notable and important exceptions.
Conclusion: We reported a practical method for categorising psychotherapy interventions in evaluative studies with applications beyond schizophrenia. A move towards consensus on the classification and reporting of psychotherapies is needed.
Clinical implications: This classification can aid clinicians, clinical practice guideline developers, and evidence synthesis experts to recognise and compare the interventions from same or different classes.
期刊介绍：
Evidence-Based Mental Health alerts clinicians to important advances in treatment, diagnosis, aetiology, prognosis, continuing education, economic evaluation and qualitative research in mental health. Published by the British Psychological Society, the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the BMJ Publishing Group the journal surveys a wide range of international medical journals applying strict criteria for the quality and validity of research. Clinicians assess the relevance of the best studies and the key details of these essential studies are presented in a succinct, informative abstract with an expert commentary on its clinical application.Evidence-Based Mental Health is a multidisciplinary, quarterly publication.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
