经桡动脉通路对未破裂颅内动脉瘤进行神经干预后桡动脉闭塞的危险因素。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-27 DOI:10.1177/15910199231189927
Michiyasu Fuga, Toshihide Tanaka, Rintaro Tachi, Kyoichi Tomoto, Kenta Kazami, Akihiko Teshigawara, Toshihiro Ishibashi, Yuzuru Hasegawa, Yuichi Murayama
{"title":"经桡动脉通路对未破裂颅内动脉瘤进行神经干预后桡动脉闭塞的危险因素。","authors":"Michiyasu Fuga, Toshihide Tanaka, Rintaro Tachi, Kyoichi Tomoto, Kenta Kazami, Akihiko Teshigawara, Toshihiro Ishibashi, Yuzuru Hasegawa, Yuichi Murayama","doi":"10.1177/15910199231189927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeNeurointervention via transradial access (TRA) is less invasive than via transfemoral access. However, radial artery occlusion (RAO) may occur with TRA. The purpose of this study was to explore risk factors for RAO after coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) via TRA.MethodsForty-two consecutive patients who underwent coil embolization for UIAs via TRA between March 2021 and March 2022 and were available for angiographic evaluation 1 year after treatment were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify potential risk factors for RAO.ResultsSeventeen (40%) of the 42 patients showed RAO. Compared with the non-RAO group, radial artery size was significantly smaller (2.2 mm [interquartile range (IQR): 2.1, 2.4 mm] vs 2.6 mm [IQR: 2.5, 2.7 mm]; <i>p</i> = 0.001) and the incidence of radial artery spasm (RAS) was significantly higher in the RAO group. Multivariate analysis identified radial artery size (odds ratio [OR] 4.9 × 10<sup>-3</sup>, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.4 × 10<sup>-5</sup>-0.38) and incidence of RAS (OR 14.8, 95%CI 2.1-105) as significant independent predictors of subsequent RAO. Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the optimal cutoff for radial artery size was 2.5 mm (sensitivity, 82.4%; specificity, 76.0%; area under the ROC curve, 0.80 [95%CI 0.66-0.95]).ConclusionRadial artery size and RAS represent reliable parameters for predicting RAO 1 year after coil embolization for UIA via TRA. Prophylaxis against RAS and limiting neurointervention via TRA to patients with radial artery larger than 2.5 mm in diameter may reduce the risk of postoperative RAO.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"616-625"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12475381/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for radial artery occlusion after neurointervention for unruptured intracranial aneurysm via transradial access.\",\"authors\":\"Michiyasu Fuga, Toshihide Tanaka, Rintaro Tachi, Kyoichi Tomoto, Kenta Kazami, Akihiko Teshigawara, Toshihiro Ishibashi, Yuzuru Hasegawa, Yuichi Murayama\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199231189927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>PurposeNeurointervention via transradial access (TRA) is less invasive than via transfemoral access. However, radial artery occlusion (RAO) may occur with TRA. The purpose of this study was to explore risk factors for RAO after coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) via TRA.MethodsForty-two consecutive patients who underwent coil embolization for UIAs via TRA between March 2021 and March 2022 and were available for angiographic evaluation 1 year after treatment were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify potential risk factors for RAO.ResultsSeventeen (40%) of the 42 patients showed RAO. Compared with the non-RAO group, radial artery size was significantly smaller (2.2 mm [interquartile range (IQR): 2.1, 2.4 mm] vs 2.6 mm [IQR: 2.5, 2.7 mm]; <i>p</i> = 0.001) and the incidence of radial artery spasm (RAS) was significantly higher in the RAO group. Multivariate analysis identified radial artery size (odds ratio [OR] 4.9 × 10<sup>-3</sup>, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.4 × 10<sup>-5</sup>-0.38) and incidence of RAS (OR 14.8, 95%CI 2.1-105) as significant independent predictors of subsequent RAO. Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the optimal cutoff for radial artery size was 2.5 mm (sensitivity, 82.4%; specificity, 76.0%; area under the ROC curve, 0.80 [95%CI 0.66-0.95]).ConclusionRadial artery size and RAS represent reliable parameters for predicting RAO 1 year after coil embolization for UIA via TRA. Prophylaxis against RAS and limiting neurointervention via TRA to patients with radial artery larger than 2.5 mm in diameter may reduce the risk of postoperative RAO.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"616-625\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12475381/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199231189927\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199231189927","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:经桡动脉介入治疗(TRA)比经股动脉介入治疗创伤小。然而,桡动脉闭塞(RAO)可能发生于TRA。本研究的目的是探讨经TRA栓塞未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIAs)后发生RAO的危险因素。方法回顾性分析在2021年3月至2022年3月期间,42例连续接受TRA线圈栓塞治疗UIAs的患者,并在治疗1年后进行血管造影评估。进行多因素logistic回归分析以确定RAO的潜在危险因素。结果42例患者中有17例(40%)出现RAO。与非rao组相比,桡动脉尺寸明显较小(2.2 mm[四分位间距(IQR): 2.1, 2.4 mm] vs 2.6 mm [IQR: 2.5, 2.7 mm];p = 0.001), RAO组桡动脉痉挛(RAS)发生率显著增高。多因素分析发现桡动脉大小(比值比[OR] 4.9 × 10-3, 95%可信区间[CI] 6.4 × 10-5-0.38)和RAS发生率(比值比[OR] 14.8, 95%CI 2.1-105)是后续RAO的重要独立预测因素。根据受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,桡动脉大小的最佳临界值为2.5 mm(敏感性82.4%,特异性76.0%,ROC曲线下面积0.80 [95%CI 0.66-0.95])。结论桡动脉大小和RAS是预测UIA经TRA线圈栓塞1年后RAO的可靠参数。桡动脉直径大于2.5 mm的患者预防RAS和限制经TRA神经干预可降低术后RAO的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk factors for radial artery occlusion after neurointervention for unruptured intracranial aneurysm via transradial access.

PurposeNeurointervention via transradial access (TRA) is less invasive than via transfemoral access. However, radial artery occlusion (RAO) may occur with TRA. The purpose of this study was to explore risk factors for RAO after coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) via TRA.MethodsForty-two consecutive patients who underwent coil embolization for UIAs via TRA between March 2021 and March 2022 and were available for angiographic evaluation 1 year after treatment were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify potential risk factors for RAO.ResultsSeventeen (40%) of the 42 patients showed RAO. Compared with the non-RAO group, radial artery size was significantly smaller (2.2 mm [interquartile range (IQR): 2.1, 2.4 mm] vs 2.6 mm [IQR: 2.5, 2.7 mm]; p = 0.001) and the incidence of radial artery spasm (RAS) was significantly higher in the RAO group. Multivariate analysis identified radial artery size (odds ratio [OR] 4.9 × 10-3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.4 × 10-5-0.38) and incidence of RAS (OR 14.8, 95%CI 2.1-105) as significant independent predictors of subsequent RAO. Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the optimal cutoff for radial artery size was 2.5 mm (sensitivity, 82.4%; specificity, 76.0%; area under the ROC curve, 0.80 [95%CI 0.66-0.95]).ConclusionRadial artery size and RAS represent reliable parameters for predicting RAO 1 year after coil embolization for UIA via TRA. Prophylaxis against RAS and limiting neurointervention via TRA to patients with radial artery larger than 2.5 mm in diameter may reduce the risk of postoperative RAO.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信