{"title":"唾液测试条测定乙醇含量的性能,与气相色谱法和酒精测试法相比。","authors":"Niklas Wargh, Juha Piltti, Pirjo Hedberg","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2023.2255970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We set out to determine the performance of the Testi Technologies enzymatic assay saliva ethanol test strips of three different detection levels: 0 g/L, 0.2 g/L and 0.5 g/L, using as the reference method a gas chromatography analyser (GC). Alcohol levels were measured in 104 volunteers at up to three points in time, using up to three test strips per measurement, while gathering blood samples and breathalyser readings in parallel. The plasma alcohol concentrations (PAC) were determined from the plasma samples using GC. The qualitative results of the test strips were compared to the quantitative results from the reference method, as well as the breathalyser readings, and the amount of true and false positive and true and false negative results were classified using predetermined cut-off levels. The best performing test strips were the 0 g/L and the 0.2 g/L strips. The 0 g/L strips had a sensitivity and specificity of 1.00, as false negatives and false positives were not detected. The 0.2 g/L strips had a sensitivity and specificity [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 0.98 (0.96 - 1.00) and 0.83 (0.62 - 1.00) respectively, an accuracy of 0.97 (0.95 - 0.99), and a diagnostic odds ratio of 205.00 (35.33 - 1189.66). The test strips perform their intended purpose of screening for alcohol consumption well, with their great sensitivity as a defining property compared to other testing methods. For them to be able to be implemented in a clinical setting however, further refinement of the tests' characteristics would be required.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"432-438"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The performance of saliva test strips for determining ethanol levels, as compared to gas chromatography and breathalyser methods.\",\"authors\":\"Niklas Wargh, Juha Piltti, Pirjo Hedberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00365513.2023.2255970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We set out to determine the performance of the Testi Technologies enzymatic assay saliva ethanol test strips of three different detection levels: 0 g/L, 0.2 g/L and 0.5 g/L, using as the reference method a gas chromatography analyser (GC). Alcohol levels were measured in 104 volunteers at up to three points in time, using up to three test strips per measurement, while gathering blood samples and breathalyser readings in parallel. The plasma alcohol concentrations (PAC) were determined from the plasma samples using GC. The qualitative results of the test strips were compared to the quantitative results from the reference method, as well as the breathalyser readings, and the amount of true and false positive and true and false negative results were classified using predetermined cut-off levels. The best performing test strips were the 0 g/L and the 0.2 g/L strips. The 0 g/L strips had a sensitivity and specificity of 1.00, as false negatives and false positives were not detected. The 0.2 g/L strips had a sensitivity and specificity [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 0.98 (0.96 - 1.00) and 0.83 (0.62 - 1.00) respectively, an accuracy of 0.97 (0.95 - 0.99), and a diagnostic odds ratio of 205.00 (35.33 - 1189.66). The test strips perform their intended purpose of screening for alcohol consumption well, with their great sensitivity as a defining property compared to other testing methods. For them to be able to be implemented in a clinical setting however, further refinement of the tests' characteristics would be required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"432-438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2023.2255970\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2023.2255970","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The performance of saliva test strips for determining ethanol levels, as compared to gas chromatography and breathalyser methods.
We set out to determine the performance of the Testi Technologies enzymatic assay saliva ethanol test strips of three different detection levels: 0 g/L, 0.2 g/L and 0.5 g/L, using as the reference method a gas chromatography analyser (GC). Alcohol levels were measured in 104 volunteers at up to three points in time, using up to three test strips per measurement, while gathering blood samples and breathalyser readings in parallel. The plasma alcohol concentrations (PAC) were determined from the plasma samples using GC. The qualitative results of the test strips were compared to the quantitative results from the reference method, as well as the breathalyser readings, and the amount of true and false positive and true and false negative results were classified using predetermined cut-off levels. The best performing test strips were the 0 g/L and the 0.2 g/L strips. The 0 g/L strips had a sensitivity and specificity of 1.00, as false negatives and false positives were not detected. The 0.2 g/L strips had a sensitivity and specificity [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 0.98 (0.96 - 1.00) and 0.83 (0.62 - 1.00) respectively, an accuracy of 0.97 (0.95 - 0.99), and a diagnostic odds ratio of 205.00 (35.33 - 1189.66). The test strips perform their intended purpose of screening for alcohol consumption well, with their great sensitivity as a defining property compared to other testing methods. For them to be able to be implemented in a clinical setting however, further refinement of the tests' characteristics would be required.
期刊介绍:
The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry.
The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.