针对银屑病关节炎和银屑病患者的疾病特异性心血管风险预测模型的推导和内部验证。

IF 11.4 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Keith Colaco, Ker-Ai Lee, Shadi Akhtari, Raz Winer, Vinod Chandran, Paula Harvey, Richard J. Cook, Vincent Piguet, Dafna D. Gladman, Lihi Eder
{"title":"针对银屑病关节炎和银屑病患者的疾病特异性心血管风险预测模型的推导和内部验证。","authors":"Keith Colaco,&nbsp;Ker-Ai Lee,&nbsp;Shadi Akhtari,&nbsp;Raz Winer,&nbsp;Vinod Chandran,&nbsp;Paula Harvey,&nbsp;Richard J. Cook,&nbsp;Vincent Piguet,&nbsp;Dafna D. Gladman,&nbsp;Lihi Eder","doi":"10.1002/art.42694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To address suboptimal cardiovascular risk prediction in patients with psoriatic disease (PsD), we developed and internally validated a five-year disease-specific cardiovascular risk prediction model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed data from a prospective cohort of participants with PsD without a history of cardiovascular events. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and PsD-related measures of disease activity were considered as potential predictors. The study outcome included nonfatal and fatal cardiovascular events. A base prediction model included 10 traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Eight PsD-related factors were assessed by adding them to the base model to create expanded models, which were controlled for PsD therapies. Variable selection was performed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) penalized regression with 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using measures of discrimination and calibration and measures of sensitivity and specificity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Between 1992 and 2020, 85 of 1,336 participants developed cardiovascular events. Discrimination of the base model (with traditional cardiovascular risk factors alone) was excellent, with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 85.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 81.9–89.1). Optimal models did not select any of the tested disease-specific factors. In a sensitivity analysis, which excluded lipid lowering and antihypertensive treatments, the number of damaged joints was selected in the expanded model. However, this model did not improve risk discrimination compared to the base model (AUC 85.5, 95% CI 82.0–89.1).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <div>Traditional cardiovascular risk factors alone are effective in predicting cardiovascular risk in patients with PsD. A risk score based on these factors performed well, indicating excellent discrimination and calibration.\n\n <figure>\n <div><picture>\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\n </div>\n </figure>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":129,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","volume":"76 2","pages":"238-246"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/art.42694","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Derivation and Internal Validation of a Disease-Specific Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Model for Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis and Psoriasis\",\"authors\":\"Keith Colaco,&nbsp;Ker-Ai Lee,&nbsp;Shadi Akhtari,&nbsp;Raz Winer,&nbsp;Vinod Chandran,&nbsp;Paula Harvey,&nbsp;Richard J. Cook,&nbsp;Vincent Piguet,&nbsp;Dafna D. Gladman,&nbsp;Lihi Eder\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/art.42694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To address suboptimal cardiovascular risk prediction in patients with psoriatic disease (PsD), we developed and internally validated a five-year disease-specific cardiovascular risk prediction model.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We analyzed data from a prospective cohort of participants with PsD without a history of cardiovascular events. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and PsD-related measures of disease activity were considered as potential predictors. The study outcome included nonfatal and fatal cardiovascular events. A base prediction model included 10 traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Eight PsD-related factors were assessed by adding them to the base model to create expanded models, which were controlled for PsD therapies. Variable selection was performed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) penalized regression with 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using measures of discrimination and calibration and measures of sensitivity and specificity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Between 1992 and 2020, 85 of 1,336 participants developed cardiovascular events. Discrimination of the base model (with traditional cardiovascular risk factors alone) was excellent, with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 85.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 81.9–89.1). Optimal models did not select any of the tested disease-specific factors. In a sensitivity analysis, which excluded lipid lowering and antihypertensive treatments, the number of damaged joints was selected in the expanded model. However, this model did not improve risk discrimination compared to the base model (AUC 85.5, 95% CI 82.0–89.1).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <div>Traditional cardiovascular risk factors alone are effective in predicting cardiovascular risk in patients with PsD. A risk score based on these factors performed well, indicating excellent discrimination and calibration.\\n\\n <figure>\\n <div><picture>\\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\\n </div>\\n </figure>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis & Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"76 2\",\"pages\":\"238-246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/art.42694\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis & Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.42694\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.42694","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为了解决银屑病(PsD)患者心血管风险预测不理想的问题,我们开发了一个五年期疾病特异性心血管风险预测模型,并在内部进行了验证:我们分析了前瞻性队列中无心血管事件史的银屑病患者的数据。传统的心血管风险因素和与 PsD 相关的疾病活动指标被视为潜在的预测因素。研究结果包括非致命性和致命性心血管事件。基础预测模型包括 10 个传统心血管风险因素。通过在基础模型中加入 8 个与 PsD 相关的因素,建立了扩展模型,并对 PsD 治疗进行了控制。变量选择采用最小绝对缩减和选择操作器(LASSO)惩罚回归法,并进行了 10 次交叉验证。使用判别和校准指标以及灵敏度和特异性指标对模型性能进行评估:1992年至2020年间,1336名参与者中有85人发生了心血管事件。基础模型(仅包含传统心血管风险因素)的判别能力极佳,接收器运算特征曲线下面积(AUC)为 85.5(95% 置信区间 [CI] 81.9-89.1)。最佳模型没有选择任何经测试的疾病特异性因素。在排除降脂和降压治疗的敏感性分析中,扩展模型选择了受损关节的数量。然而,与基础模型相比,该模型并没有提高风险识别能力(AUC 85.5,95% CI 82.0-89.1):结论:仅传统的心血管风险因素就能有效预测 PsD 患者的心血管风险。基于这些因素的风险评分表现良好,显示出卓越的辨别能力和校准能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Derivation and Internal Validation of a Disease-Specific Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Model for Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis and Psoriasis

Derivation and Internal Validation of a Disease-Specific Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Model for Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis and Psoriasis

Derivation and Internal Validation of a Disease-Specific Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Model for Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis and Psoriasis

Objective

To address suboptimal cardiovascular risk prediction in patients with psoriatic disease (PsD), we developed and internally validated a five-year disease-specific cardiovascular risk prediction model.

Methods

We analyzed data from a prospective cohort of participants with PsD without a history of cardiovascular events. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and PsD-related measures of disease activity were considered as potential predictors. The study outcome included nonfatal and fatal cardiovascular events. A base prediction model included 10 traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Eight PsD-related factors were assessed by adding them to the base model to create expanded models, which were controlled for PsD therapies. Variable selection was performed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) penalized regression with 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using measures of discrimination and calibration and measures of sensitivity and specificity.

Results

Between 1992 and 2020, 85 of 1,336 participants developed cardiovascular events. Discrimination of the base model (with traditional cardiovascular risk factors alone) was excellent, with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 85.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 81.9–89.1). Optimal models did not select any of the tested disease-specific factors. In a sensitivity analysis, which excluded lipid lowering and antihypertensive treatments, the number of damaged joints was selected in the expanded model. However, this model did not improve risk discrimination compared to the base model (AUC 85.5, 95% CI 82.0–89.1).

Conclusion

Traditional cardiovascular risk factors alone are effective in predicting cardiovascular risk in patients with PsD. A risk score based on these factors performed well, indicating excellent discrimination and calibration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Arthritis & Rheumatology RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
371
期刊介绍: Arthritis & Rheumatology is the official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and focuses on the natural history, pathophysiology, treatment, and outcome of rheumatic diseases. It is a peer-reviewed publication that aims to provide the highest quality basic and clinical research in this field. The journal covers a wide range of investigative areas and also includes review articles, editorials, and educational material for researchers and clinicians. Being recognized as a leading research journal in rheumatology, Arthritis & Rheumatology serves the global community of rheumatology investigators and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信