文丘里式背包喷雾除污系统的性能测试。

IF 0.5 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Alan Beswick, Claire Bailey, Brian Crook, David Crouch, Jayne Farrant, Gillian Frost, Stephen Stagg
{"title":"文丘里式背包喷雾除污系统的性能测试。","authors":"Alan Beswick,&nbsp;Claire Bailey,&nbsp;Brian Crook,&nbsp;David Crouch,&nbsp;Jayne Farrant,&nbsp;Gillian Frost,&nbsp;Stephen Stagg","doi":"10.1177/1535676019898299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The performance of 2 disinfectant chemicals, peracetic acid (PAA) and hypochlorous acid (HOCl), was evaluated using a Venturi-nozzle-based light decontamination system (LDS) for delivery. The atomization equipment combined low-pressure air and disinfectant via a handheld lance, producing a fine, dense aerosol. A range of microorganisms, including <i>Bacillus cereus</i> and <i>Bacillus anthracis</i> (<i>Vollum</i>) spores, were used as test challenges to evaluate chemicals and equipment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The tests undertaken included assessments over fixed and variable exposure times, use of multiple surface materials, and a live agent challenge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a fixed-time exposure of 60 minutes, aerosolized PAA gave 7- to 8-log reductions of all test challenges, but HOCl was less effective. Material tests showed extensive kill on most surfaces using PAA (≥6-log kill), but HOCl showed more variation (4- to 6-log). Testing using <i>B. anthracis</i> showed measurable PAA induced spore kill inside 5 minutes and >6-log kill at 5 minutes or over. HOCl was less effective.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results demonstrate the importance of testing decontamination systems against a range of relevant microbiological challenges. Disinfectant efficacy may vary depending on product choice, types of challenge microorganisms, and their position in a treated area. The most effective disinfectants demonstrate biocidal efficacy despite these factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data confirmed PAA as an effective disinfectant capable of rapidly killing a range of microorganisms, including spores. HOCl was less effective. The LDS system successfully delivered PAA and HOCl over a wide area and could be suitable for a range of frontline biosecurity applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":7962,"journal":{"name":"Applied Biosafety","volume":"25 1","pages":"28-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1535676019898299","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Testing of a Venturi-Based Backpack Spray Decontamination System.\",\"authors\":\"Alan Beswick,&nbsp;Claire Bailey,&nbsp;Brian Crook,&nbsp;David Crouch,&nbsp;Jayne Farrant,&nbsp;Gillian Frost,&nbsp;Stephen Stagg\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1535676019898299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The performance of 2 disinfectant chemicals, peracetic acid (PAA) and hypochlorous acid (HOCl), was evaluated using a Venturi-nozzle-based light decontamination system (LDS) for delivery. The atomization equipment combined low-pressure air and disinfectant via a handheld lance, producing a fine, dense aerosol. A range of microorganisms, including <i>Bacillus cereus</i> and <i>Bacillus anthracis</i> (<i>Vollum</i>) spores, were used as test challenges to evaluate chemicals and equipment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The tests undertaken included assessments over fixed and variable exposure times, use of multiple surface materials, and a live agent challenge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a fixed-time exposure of 60 minutes, aerosolized PAA gave 7- to 8-log reductions of all test challenges, but HOCl was less effective. Material tests showed extensive kill on most surfaces using PAA (≥6-log kill), but HOCl showed more variation (4- to 6-log). Testing using <i>B. anthracis</i> showed measurable PAA induced spore kill inside 5 minutes and >6-log kill at 5 minutes or over. HOCl was less effective.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results demonstrate the importance of testing decontamination systems against a range of relevant microbiological challenges. Disinfectant efficacy may vary depending on product choice, types of challenge microorganisms, and their position in a treated area. The most effective disinfectants demonstrate biocidal efficacy despite these factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data confirmed PAA as an effective disinfectant capable of rapidly killing a range of microorganisms, including spores. HOCl was less effective. The LDS system successfully delivered PAA and HOCl over a wide area and could be suitable for a range of frontline biosecurity applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Biosafety\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"28-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1535676019898299\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Biosafety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1535676019898299\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Biosafety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1535676019898299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:采用文丘里喷嘴光去污系统(LDS)对过氧乙酸(PAA)和次氯酸(HOCl)两种消毒液的性能进行了评价。雾化设备通过手持喷枪将低压空气和消毒剂结合在一起,产生细而致密的气溶胶。一系列微生物,包括蜡样芽孢杆菌和炭疽芽孢杆菌孢子,被用作评估化学品和设备的测试挑战。方法:所进行的试验包括对固定和可变暴露时间、多种表面材料的使用和活剂挑战的评估。结果:在60分钟的固定时间暴露中,雾化PAA使所有测试挑战减少了7到8 log,但HOCl的效果较差。材料测试表明,PAA在大多数表面上具有广泛的杀伤作用(≥6-log),但HOCl表现出更多的变化(4- 6-log)。用炭疽芽孢杆菌进行的试验表明,PAA诱导的孢子在5分钟内杀死量可测量,在5分钟或更长时间内杀死量大于6 log。HOCl效果较差。讨论:结果表明测试净化系统对一系列相关微生物挑战的重要性。消毒剂的功效可能因产品选择、挑战微生物的类型及其在处理区域的位置而异。尽管存在这些因素,但最有效的消毒剂仍显示出杀灭生物的功效。结论:该数据证实PAA是一种有效的消毒剂,能够快速杀死一系列微生物,包括孢子。HOCl效果较差。LDS系统成功地在大范围内提供了PAA和HOCl,可以适用于一系列一线生物安全应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Testing of a Venturi-Based Backpack Spray Decontamination System.

Introduction: The performance of 2 disinfectant chemicals, peracetic acid (PAA) and hypochlorous acid (HOCl), was evaluated using a Venturi-nozzle-based light decontamination system (LDS) for delivery. The atomization equipment combined low-pressure air and disinfectant via a handheld lance, producing a fine, dense aerosol. A range of microorganisms, including Bacillus cereus and Bacillus anthracis (Vollum) spores, were used as test challenges to evaluate chemicals and equipment.

Methods: The tests undertaken included assessments over fixed and variable exposure times, use of multiple surface materials, and a live agent challenge.

Results: Over a fixed-time exposure of 60 minutes, aerosolized PAA gave 7- to 8-log reductions of all test challenges, but HOCl was less effective. Material tests showed extensive kill on most surfaces using PAA (≥6-log kill), but HOCl showed more variation (4- to 6-log). Testing using B. anthracis showed measurable PAA induced spore kill inside 5 minutes and >6-log kill at 5 minutes or over. HOCl was less effective.

Discussion: The results demonstrate the importance of testing decontamination systems against a range of relevant microbiological challenges. Disinfectant efficacy may vary depending on product choice, types of challenge microorganisms, and their position in a treated area. The most effective disinfectants demonstrate biocidal efficacy despite these factors.

Conclusion: The data confirmed PAA as an effective disinfectant capable of rapidly killing a range of microorganisms, including spores. HOCl was less effective. The LDS system successfully delivered PAA and HOCl over a wide area and could be suitable for a range of frontline biosecurity applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Biosafety
Applied Biosafety Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Applied Biosafety (APB), sponsored by ABSA International, is a peer-reviewed, scientific journal committed to promoting global biosafety awareness and best practices to prevent occupational exposures and adverse environmental impacts related to biohazardous releases. APB provides a forum for exchanging sound biosafety and biosecurity initiatives by publishing original articles, review articles, letters to the editors, commentaries, and brief reviews. APB informs scientists, safety professionals, policymakers, engineers, architects, and governmental organizations. The journal is committed to publishing on topics significant in well-resourced countries as well as information relevant to underserved regions, engaging and cultivating the development of biosafety professionals globally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信