制定和验证一项新的标准化措施,用于评估心理健康服务中的歧视经历。参与式研究项目。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Antonio Lasalvia, Stefano Pillan, Giulia Marzocco, Anna Ambrosini, Franco Veltro, Tecla Pozzan, Camilla D'Astore, Doriana Cristofalo, Mirella Ruggeri, Chiara Bonetto
{"title":"制定和验证一项新的标准化措施,用于评估心理健康服务中的歧视经历。参与式研究项目。","authors":"Antonio Lasalvia,&nbsp;Stefano Pillan,&nbsp;Giulia Marzocco,&nbsp;Anna Ambrosini,&nbsp;Franco Veltro,&nbsp;Tecla Pozzan,&nbsp;Camilla D'Astore,&nbsp;Doriana Cristofalo,&nbsp;Mirella Ruggeri,&nbsp;Chiara Bonetto","doi":"10.1017/S2045796023000689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>People with mental disorders frequently report experiences of discrimination within mental health services, which can have significant detrimental effects on individuals' well-being and recovery. This study aimed to develop and validate a new standardized measure aiming to assess experiences of stigmatization among people with mental disorders within mental health services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The scale was developed in Italian and tested for ease of use, comprehension, acceptability, relevance of items and response options within focus group session. A cross-sectional validation survey was conducted among mental health service users in Italy. Exploratory factor analysis with Promax oblique rotation, the Kaiser<b>-</b>Meyer<b>-</b>Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy and the Bartlett's test of sphericity were used to assess the suitability of the sample for factor analysis. Reliability was assessed as internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha and as test-retest reliability using weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Precision was examined by Kendall's tau-b coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 240 people with mental disorders participated in the study; 56 also completed the retest evaluation after 2 weeks. The 18 items of the scale converged over a two-factor solution ('Dignity violation and personhood devaluation' and 'Perceived life restrictions and social exclusion'), accounting for 56.4% of the variance (KMO 0.903; Bartlett's test <i>p</i> < 0.001). Cronbach's alpha for the total score was 0.934. The scale showed one item with kappa above 0.81, four items between 0.61 and 0.80, ten items between 0.41 and 0.60, two items between 0.21 and 0.40 and only one item below 0.20. ICC was 0.928 (95% CI 0.877-0.958). Kendall's tau-b ranged from 0.450 to 0.617 (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The newly developed scale represents a valid and reliable measure for assessing experiences of stigma among patients receiving care within mental health services. The scale has provided initial evidence of being specifically tailored for individuals with psychotic and bipolar disorders. However, the factorial structure of the scale should be replicated through a confirmatory factor analysis on a larger sample of individuals with these conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"32 ","pages":"e54"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10539746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a new standardized measure for assessing experiences of discrimination within mental health services. A participatory research project.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Lasalvia,&nbsp;Stefano Pillan,&nbsp;Giulia Marzocco,&nbsp;Anna Ambrosini,&nbsp;Franco Veltro,&nbsp;Tecla Pozzan,&nbsp;Camilla D'Astore,&nbsp;Doriana Cristofalo,&nbsp;Mirella Ruggeri,&nbsp;Chiara Bonetto\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S2045796023000689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>People with mental disorders frequently report experiences of discrimination within mental health services, which can have significant detrimental effects on individuals' well-being and recovery. This study aimed to develop and validate a new standardized measure aiming to assess experiences of stigmatization among people with mental disorders within mental health services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The scale was developed in Italian and tested for ease of use, comprehension, acceptability, relevance of items and response options within focus group session. A cross-sectional validation survey was conducted among mental health service users in Italy. Exploratory factor analysis with Promax oblique rotation, the Kaiser<b>-</b>Meyer<b>-</b>Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy and the Bartlett's test of sphericity were used to assess the suitability of the sample for factor analysis. Reliability was assessed as internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha and as test-retest reliability using weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Precision was examined by Kendall's tau-b coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 240 people with mental disorders participated in the study; 56 also completed the retest evaluation after 2 weeks. The 18 items of the scale converged over a two-factor solution ('Dignity violation and personhood devaluation' and 'Perceived life restrictions and social exclusion'), accounting for 56.4% of the variance (KMO 0.903; Bartlett's test <i>p</i> < 0.001). Cronbach's alpha for the total score was 0.934. The scale showed one item with kappa above 0.81, four items between 0.61 and 0.80, ten items between 0.41 and 0.60, two items between 0.21 and 0.40 and only one item below 0.20. ICC was 0.928 (95% CI 0.877-0.958). Kendall's tau-b ranged from 0.450 to 0.617 (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The newly developed scale represents a valid and reliable measure for assessing experiences of stigma among patients receiving care within mental health services. The scale has provided initial evidence of being specifically tailored for individuals with psychotic and bipolar disorders. However, the factorial structure of the scale should be replicated through a confirmatory factor analysis on a larger sample of individuals with these conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"e54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10539746/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796023000689\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796023000689","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:精神障碍患者经常报告在心理健康服务中遭受歧视,这可能对个人的健康和康复产生重大不利影响。这项研究旨在开发和验证一种新的标准化措施,旨在评估精神卫生服务中精神障碍患者的污名化经历。方法:该量表用意大利语编制,并在焦点小组会议中测试项目的易用性、理解性、可接受性、相关性和反应选项。对意大利的心理健康服务使用者进行了一项横断面验证调查。使用Promax斜旋转的探索性因子分析、Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin(KMO)采样充分性测量和Bartlett球形度测试来评估样本是否适合进行因子分析。使用Cronbachα将可靠性评估为内部一致性,使用加权kappa和组内相关系数(ICC)将可靠性评估作为重测可靠性。精度通过Kendall的tau-b系数进行检验。结果:共有240名精神障碍患者参与了这项研究;56也在2周后完成了重新测试评估。该量表的18个项目集中在一个双因素解决方案上(“点火侵犯和人格贬值”和“感知的生活限制和社会排斥”),占方差的56.4%(KMO 0.903;Bartlett检验p p结论:新开发的量表是评估接受心理健康服务的患者污名体验的有效和可靠的衡量标准。该量表提供了专门为精神病和双相情感障碍患者量身定制的初步证据通过对患有这些疾病的更大样本进行验证性因素分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development and validation of a new standardized measure for assessing experiences of discrimination within mental health services. A participatory research project.

Development and validation of a new standardized measure for assessing experiences of discrimination within mental health services. A participatory research project.

Development and validation of a new standardized measure for assessing experiences of discrimination within mental health services. A participatory research project.

Development and validation of a new standardized measure for assessing experiences of discrimination within mental health services. A participatory research project.

Aims: People with mental disorders frequently report experiences of discrimination within mental health services, which can have significant detrimental effects on individuals' well-being and recovery. This study aimed to develop and validate a new standardized measure aiming to assess experiences of stigmatization among people with mental disorders within mental health services.

Methods: The scale was developed in Italian and tested for ease of use, comprehension, acceptability, relevance of items and response options within focus group session. A cross-sectional validation survey was conducted among mental health service users in Italy. Exploratory factor analysis with Promax oblique rotation, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy and the Bartlett's test of sphericity were used to assess the suitability of the sample for factor analysis. Reliability was assessed as internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha and as test-retest reliability using weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Precision was examined by Kendall's tau-b coefficient.

Results: Overall, 240 people with mental disorders participated in the study; 56 also completed the retest evaluation after 2 weeks. The 18 items of the scale converged over a two-factor solution ('Dignity violation and personhood devaluation' and 'Perceived life restrictions and social exclusion'), accounting for 56.4% of the variance (KMO 0.903; Bartlett's test p < 0.001). Cronbach's alpha for the total score was 0.934. The scale showed one item with kappa above 0.81, four items between 0.61 and 0.80, ten items between 0.41 and 0.60, two items between 0.21 and 0.40 and only one item below 0.20. ICC was 0.928 (95% CI 0.877-0.958). Kendall's tau-b ranged from 0.450 to 0.617 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The newly developed scale represents a valid and reliable measure for assessing experiences of stigma among patients receiving care within mental health services. The scale has provided initial evidence of being specifically tailored for individuals with psychotic and bipolar disorders. However, the factorial structure of the scale should be replicated through a confirmatory factor analysis on a larger sample of individuals with these conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
1.20%
发文量
121
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences is a prestigious international, peer-reviewed journal that has been publishing in Open Access format since 2020. Formerly known as Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale and established in 1992 by Michele Tansella, the journal prioritizes highly relevant and innovative research articles and systematic reviews in the areas of public mental health and policy, mental health services and system research, as well as epidemiological and social psychiatry. Join us in advancing knowledge and understanding in these critical fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信