卢旺达社区药房的疟疾快速诊断检测:可得性、社区药剂师的知识、许可使用的利弊。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Amon Nsengimana, Joyce Isimbi, Theogene Uwizeyimana, Emmanuel Biracyaza, Jean Claude Hategekimana, Charles Uwambajimana, Olivia Gwira, Vedaste Kagisha, Domina Asingizwe, Ahmed Adedeji, Jean Baptiste Nyandwi
{"title":"卢旺达社区药房的疟疾快速诊断检测:可得性、社区药剂师的知识、许可使用的利弊。","authors":"Amon Nsengimana, Joyce Isimbi, Theogene Uwizeyimana, Emmanuel Biracyaza, Jean Claude Hategekimana, Charles Uwambajimana, Olivia Gwira, Vedaste Kagisha, Domina Asingizwe, Ahmed Adedeji, Jean Baptiste Nyandwi","doi":"10.1186/s41256-023-00324-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Presumptive treatment of malaria is often practiced in community pharmacies across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).To address this issue, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests (m-RDTs) be used in these settings, as they are used in the public sector. However, their use remains unlicensed in the community pharmacies in Rwanda. This can lessen their availability and foster presumptive treatment. Therefore, this study investigated the availability of m-RDTs, knowledge of community pharmacists on the use of m-RDTs, and explored Pharmacists' perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of licensing the use of m-RDTs in community pharmacies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study among 200 licensed community pharmacists who were purposefully sampled nationwide from 11th February to 12th April 2022. Data was collected using an online data collection instrument composed of open-ended and closed-ended questions. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. The chi-square test was used to evaluate the association between the availability of m-RDTs and independent variables of interest. Content analysis was used for qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although 59% were consulted by clients requesting to purchase m-RDTs, only 27% of the participants had m-RDTs in stock, 66.5% had no training on the use of m-RDTs, and 18.5% were not at all familiar with using the m-RDTs. Most of the participants (91.5%) agreed that licensing the use of m-RDTs in community pharmacies could promote the rational use of antimalarials. The chi-square test indicated that being requested to sell m-RDTs (x<sup>2</sup> = 6.95, p = 0.008), being requested to perform m-RDTs (x<sup>2</sup> = 5.39, p  = 0.02),familiarity using m-RDTs (x<sup>2</sup> = 17.24, p = 0.002), availability of a nurse in the Pharmacy (x<sup>2</sup> = 11.68, p < 0.001), and location of the pharmacy (x<sup>2</sup> = 9.13, p = 0.048) were all significantly associated with the availability of m-RDTs in the pharmacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The availability of m-RDTs remains low in community pharmacies in Rwanda, and less training is provided to community pharmacists regarding the use of m-RDTs. Nevertheless, community pharmacists had positive perceptions of the advantages of licensing the use of m-RDTs. Thus, licensing the use of m-RDTs is believed to be the first step toward promoting the rational use of antimalarial medicines in Rwanda.</p>","PeriodicalId":52405,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Research and Policy","volume":"8 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10496312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Malaria rapid diagnostic tests in community pharmacies in Rwanda: availability, knowledge of community pharmacists, advantages, and disadvantages of licensing their use.\",\"authors\":\"Amon Nsengimana, Joyce Isimbi, Theogene Uwizeyimana, Emmanuel Biracyaza, Jean Claude Hategekimana, Charles Uwambajimana, Olivia Gwira, Vedaste Kagisha, Domina Asingizwe, Ahmed Adedeji, Jean Baptiste Nyandwi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41256-023-00324-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Presumptive treatment of malaria is often practiced in community pharmacies across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).To address this issue, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests (m-RDTs) be used in these settings, as they are used in the public sector. However, their use remains unlicensed in the community pharmacies in Rwanda. This can lessen their availability and foster presumptive treatment. Therefore, this study investigated the availability of m-RDTs, knowledge of community pharmacists on the use of m-RDTs, and explored Pharmacists' perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of licensing the use of m-RDTs in community pharmacies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study among 200 licensed community pharmacists who were purposefully sampled nationwide from 11th February to 12th April 2022. Data was collected using an online data collection instrument composed of open-ended and closed-ended questions. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. The chi-square test was used to evaluate the association between the availability of m-RDTs and independent variables of interest. Content analysis was used for qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although 59% were consulted by clients requesting to purchase m-RDTs, only 27% of the participants had m-RDTs in stock, 66.5% had no training on the use of m-RDTs, and 18.5% were not at all familiar with using the m-RDTs. Most of the participants (91.5%) agreed that licensing the use of m-RDTs in community pharmacies could promote the rational use of antimalarials. The chi-square test indicated that being requested to sell m-RDTs (x<sup>2</sup> = 6.95, p = 0.008), being requested to perform m-RDTs (x<sup>2</sup> = 5.39, p  = 0.02),familiarity using m-RDTs (x<sup>2</sup> = 17.24, p = 0.002), availability of a nurse in the Pharmacy (x<sup>2</sup> = 11.68, p < 0.001), and location of the pharmacy (x<sup>2</sup> = 9.13, p = 0.048) were all significantly associated with the availability of m-RDTs in the pharmacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The availability of m-RDTs remains low in community pharmacies in Rwanda, and less training is provided to community pharmacists regarding the use of m-RDTs. Nevertheless, community pharmacists had positive perceptions of the advantages of licensing the use of m-RDTs. Thus, licensing the use of m-RDTs is believed to be the first step toward promoting the rational use of antimalarial medicines in Rwanda.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Health Research and Policy\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10496312/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Health Research and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-023-00324-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-023-00324-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)的社区药房,疟疾的推定治疗经常被实施。为了解决这一问题,世界卫生组织(世卫组织)建议在这些环境中使用疟疾快速诊断测试(m-RDTs),因为它们在公共部门使用。然而,在卢旺达的社区药房,它们的使用仍然是未经许可的。这可能会减少它们的可用性,并助长推定治疗。因此,本研究调查了移动替代疗法的可获得性、社区药剂师对移动替代疗法使用的认知,并探讨了药剂师对许可在社区药房使用移动替代疗法的利弊的看法。方法:对2022年2月11日至4月12日在全国范围内抽样的200名有执照的社区药剂师进行横断面研究。使用在线数据收集工具收集数据,该工具由开放式和封闭式问题组成。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS) 25.0版本进行统计分析。使用卡方检验来评估m- rdt的可用性与感兴趣的自变量之间的关联。定性资料采用内容分析。结果:虽然有59%的人咨询过要求购买m-RDTs的客户,但只有27%的参与者有m-RDTs库存,66.5%的人没有接受过使用m-RDTs的培训,18.5%的人根本不熟悉使用m-RDTs。大多数与会者(91.5%)同意在社区药房许可使用m-RDTs可以促进抗疟药物的合理使用。卡方检验显示,被要求销售m-RDTs (x2 = 6.95, p = 0.008)、被要求执行m-RDTs (x2 = 5.39, p = 0.02)、熟悉使用m-RDTs (x2 = 17.24, p = 0.002)、药房护士可获得性(x2 = 11.68, p 2 = 9.13, p = 0.048)与药房m-RDTs可获得性显著相关。结论:卢旺达社区药房的移动替代疗法的可获得性仍然很低,并且向社区药剂师提供的关于移动替代疗法使用的培训较少。然而,社区药剂师对许可使用m-RDTs的优势持积极看法。因此,许可使用m- rdt被认为是在卢旺达促进合理使用抗疟疾药物的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Malaria rapid diagnostic tests in community pharmacies in Rwanda: availability, knowledge of community pharmacists, advantages, and disadvantages of licensing their use.

Background: Presumptive treatment of malaria is often practiced in community pharmacies across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).To address this issue, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests (m-RDTs) be used in these settings, as they are used in the public sector. However, their use remains unlicensed in the community pharmacies in Rwanda. This can lessen their availability and foster presumptive treatment. Therefore, this study investigated the availability of m-RDTs, knowledge of community pharmacists on the use of m-RDTs, and explored Pharmacists' perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of licensing the use of m-RDTs in community pharmacies.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study among 200 licensed community pharmacists who were purposefully sampled nationwide from 11th February to 12th April 2022. Data was collected using an online data collection instrument composed of open-ended and closed-ended questions. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. The chi-square test was used to evaluate the association between the availability of m-RDTs and independent variables of interest. Content analysis was used for qualitative data.

Results: Although 59% were consulted by clients requesting to purchase m-RDTs, only 27% of the participants had m-RDTs in stock, 66.5% had no training on the use of m-RDTs, and 18.5% were not at all familiar with using the m-RDTs. Most of the participants (91.5%) agreed that licensing the use of m-RDTs in community pharmacies could promote the rational use of antimalarials. The chi-square test indicated that being requested to sell m-RDTs (x2 = 6.95, p = 0.008), being requested to perform m-RDTs (x2 = 5.39, p  = 0.02),familiarity using m-RDTs (x2 = 17.24, p = 0.002), availability of a nurse in the Pharmacy (x2 = 11.68, p < 0.001), and location of the pharmacy (x2 = 9.13, p = 0.048) were all significantly associated with the availability of m-RDTs in the pharmacy.

Conclusions: The availability of m-RDTs remains low in community pharmacies in Rwanda, and less training is provided to community pharmacists regarding the use of m-RDTs. Nevertheless, community pharmacists had positive perceptions of the advantages of licensing the use of m-RDTs. Thus, licensing the use of m-RDTs is believed to be the first step toward promoting the rational use of antimalarial medicines in Rwanda.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Health Research and Policy
Global Health Research and Policy Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.10%
发文量
43
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Research and Policy, an open-access, multidisciplinary journal, publishes research on various aspects of global health, addressing topics like health equity, health systems and policy, social determinants of health, disease burden, population health, and other urgent global health issues. It serves as a forum for high-quality research focused on regional and global health improvement, emphasizing solutions for health equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信