乳房再造术患者人工扩张器植入术后预防感染。

Satoko Onishi, Yoshikazu Inoue, Maki Inukai, Takayuki Okumoto
{"title":"乳房再造术患者人工扩张器植入术后预防感染。","authors":"Satoko Onishi,&nbsp;Yoshikazu Inoue,&nbsp;Maki Inukai,&nbsp;Takayuki Okumoto","doi":"10.20407/fmj.2020-029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Breast reconstruction using synthetic materials has increased rapidly in Japan since July 2013, when national health insurance began covering the procedure. Although synthetic material-based reconstruction of other body parts has not resulted in wounds with complications, this significant advantage is overshadowed by a risk of complications, including infection, following breast reconstruction. We therefore reviewed breast-reconstruction patients who experienced infection after implantation of synthetic materials and the countermeasures we used to address the problem.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 2013 through December 2019, our department performed primary breast reconstructions using tissue expanders (TEs) in 106 patients and secondary breast reconstructions in 39 patients. We retrospectively reviewed these 145 patients in terms of their age, body mass index, timing of the reconstruction, presence/absence of both chemotherapy and radiation therapy before and after surgery, presence/absence of postoperative wound complications, and presence/absence of atopic dermatitis. We then evaluated whether these factors put patients at risk for postoperative TE infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 145 patients who underwent reconstruction with TE, 3 (2.0%) were diagnosed with a postoperative TE infection. Our review revealed that necrosis of the skin around the surgical wound (P=0.004) and atopic dermatitis (P=0.041) were risk factors for TE infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Infection following breast reconstruction with synthetic materials is a serious complication. Thus, patients requiring this surgery deserve optimal perioperative management. For those with known risk factors, a more appropriate surgical approach-e.g., using autologous tissue instead of a synthetic material-could be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":33657,"journal":{"name":"Fujita Medical Journal","volume":"8 2","pages":"42-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preventing infection after synthetic expander implantation in patients undergoing breast reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Satoko Onishi,&nbsp;Yoshikazu Inoue,&nbsp;Maki Inukai,&nbsp;Takayuki Okumoto\",\"doi\":\"10.20407/fmj.2020-029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Breast reconstruction using synthetic materials has increased rapidly in Japan since July 2013, when national health insurance began covering the procedure. Although synthetic material-based reconstruction of other body parts has not resulted in wounds with complications, this significant advantage is overshadowed by a risk of complications, including infection, following breast reconstruction. We therefore reviewed breast-reconstruction patients who experienced infection after implantation of synthetic materials and the countermeasures we used to address the problem.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 2013 through December 2019, our department performed primary breast reconstructions using tissue expanders (TEs) in 106 patients and secondary breast reconstructions in 39 patients. We retrospectively reviewed these 145 patients in terms of their age, body mass index, timing of the reconstruction, presence/absence of both chemotherapy and radiation therapy before and after surgery, presence/absence of postoperative wound complications, and presence/absence of atopic dermatitis. We then evaluated whether these factors put patients at risk for postoperative TE infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 145 patients who underwent reconstruction with TE, 3 (2.0%) were diagnosed with a postoperative TE infection. Our review revealed that necrosis of the skin around the surgical wound (P=0.004) and atopic dermatitis (P=0.041) were risk factors for TE infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Infection following breast reconstruction with synthetic materials is a serious complication. Thus, patients requiring this surgery deserve optimal perioperative management. For those with known risk factors, a more appropriate surgical approach-e.g., using autologous tissue instead of a synthetic material-could be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fujita Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"42-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069269/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fujita Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2020-029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fujita Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2020-029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:自2013年7月国家健康保险开始覆盖乳房重建手术以来,日本使用合成材料进行乳房重建的人数迅速增加。虽然以合成材料为基础的身体其他部位的重建没有导致伤口并发症,但这一显著优势被乳房重建后并发症(包括感染)的风险所掩盖。因此,我们回顾了人工合成材料植入后发生感染的乳房重建患者以及我们用来解决问题的对策。方法:2013年7月至2019年12月,我科使用组织扩张器(te)对106例患者进行了一次乳房重建,对39例患者进行了二次乳房重建。我们回顾性地回顾了这145例患者的年龄、体重指数、重建时间、术前和术后化疗和放疗的有无、术后伤口并发症的有无、特应性皮炎的有无。然后我们评估这些因素是否会增加患者术后TE感染的风险。结果:145例TE重建患者中,3例(2.0%)被诊断为术后TE感染。我们的回顾显示,手术伤口周围皮肤坏死(P=0.004)和特应性皮炎(P=0.041)是TE感染的危险因素。结论:合成材料乳房再造术后感染是严重的并发症。因此,需要这种手术的患者应该得到最佳的围手术期管理。对于那些已知危险因素的患者,更合适的手术方法是:可以考虑使用自体组织代替合成材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preventing infection after synthetic expander implantation in patients undergoing breast reconstruction.

Objectives: Breast reconstruction using synthetic materials has increased rapidly in Japan since July 2013, when national health insurance began covering the procedure. Although synthetic material-based reconstruction of other body parts has not resulted in wounds with complications, this significant advantage is overshadowed by a risk of complications, including infection, following breast reconstruction. We therefore reviewed breast-reconstruction patients who experienced infection after implantation of synthetic materials and the countermeasures we used to address the problem.

Methods: From July 2013 through December 2019, our department performed primary breast reconstructions using tissue expanders (TEs) in 106 patients and secondary breast reconstructions in 39 patients. We retrospectively reviewed these 145 patients in terms of their age, body mass index, timing of the reconstruction, presence/absence of both chemotherapy and radiation therapy before and after surgery, presence/absence of postoperative wound complications, and presence/absence of atopic dermatitis. We then evaluated whether these factors put patients at risk for postoperative TE infection.

Results: Among the 145 patients who underwent reconstruction with TE, 3 (2.0%) were diagnosed with a postoperative TE infection. Our review revealed that necrosis of the skin around the surgical wound (P=0.004) and atopic dermatitis (P=0.041) were risk factors for TE infection.

Conclusions: Infection following breast reconstruction with synthetic materials is a serious complication. Thus, patients requiring this surgery deserve optimal perioperative management. For those with known risk factors, a more appropriate surgical approach-e.g., using autologous tissue instead of a synthetic material-could be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信