人类学伦理——知情社区参与非洲新冠肺炎临床试验。

IF 0.9 3区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS
Sarah J. L. Edwards, Blessing Silaigwana, Danny Asogun, Julius Mugwagwa, Francine Ntoumi, Rashid Ansumana, Kevin Bardosh, Jennyfer Ambe
{"title":"人类学伦理——知情社区参与非洲新冠肺炎临床试验。","authors":"Sarah J. L. Edwards,&nbsp;Blessing Silaigwana,&nbsp;Danny Asogun,&nbsp;Julius Mugwagwa,&nbsp;Francine Ntoumi,&nbsp;Rashid Ansumana,&nbsp;Kevin Bardosh,&nbsp;Jennyfer Ambe","doi":"10.1111/dewb.12367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The COVID-19 pandemic has reinforced the critical role of ethics and community engagement in designing and conducting clinical research during infectious disease outbreaks where no vaccine or treatment already exists. In reviewing current practices across Africa, we distinguish between three distinct roles for community engagement in clinical research that are often conflated: 1) the importance of community engagement for identifying and honouring cultural sensitivities; 2) the importance of recognising the socio-political context in which the research is proposed; and 3) the importance of understanding what is in the interest of communities recruited to research according to their own views and values. By making these distinctions, we show that current practice of clinical research could draw on anthropology in ways which are sometimes unnecessary to solicit local cultural values, overlook the importance of socio-political contexts and wider societal structures within which it works, potentially serving to reinforce unjust political or social regimes, and threaten to cast doubt on the trustworthiness of the research. We argue that more discerning anthropological engagement as well as wider collaboration with other social scientists and those working in the humanities is urgently needed to improve the ethics of current biomedical and pharmaceutical research practice in Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":50590,"journal":{"name":"Developing World Bioethics","volume":"23 3","pages":"242-251"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538500/pdf/DEWB-9999-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An ethics of anthropology-informed community engagement with COVID-19 clinical trials in Africa\",\"authors\":\"Sarah J. L. Edwards,&nbsp;Blessing Silaigwana,&nbsp;Danny Asogun,&nbsp;Julius Mugwagwa,&nbsp;Francine Ntoumi,&nbsp;Rashid Ansumana,&nbsp;Kevin Bardosh,&nbsp;Jennyfer Ambe\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dewb.12367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The COVID-19 pandemic has reinforced the critical role of ethics and community engagement in designing and conducting clinical research during infectious disease outbreaks where no vaccine or treatment already exists. In reviewing current practices across Africa, we distinguish between three distinct roles for community engagement in clinical research that are often conflated: 1) the importance of community engagement for identifying and honouring cultural sensitivities; 2) the importance of recognising the socio-political context in which the research is proposed; and 3) the importance of understanding what is in the interest of communities recruited to research according to their own views and values. By making these distinctions, we show that current practice of clinical research could draw on anthropology in ways which are sometimes unnecessary to solicit local cultural values, overlook the importance of socio-political contexts and wider societal structures within which it works, potentially serving to reinforce unjust political or social regimes, and threaten to cast doubt on the trustworthiness of the research. We argue that more discerning anthropological engagement as well as wider collaboration with other social scientists and those working in the humanities is urgently needed to improve the ethics of current biomedical and pharmaceutical research practice in Africa.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developing World Bioethics\",\"volume\":\"23 3\",\"pages\":\"242-251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538500/pdf/DEWB-9999-0.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developing World Bioethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dewb.12367\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developing World Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dewb.12367","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新冠肺炎大流行加强了伦理和社区参与在传染病爆发期间设计和进行临床研究的关键作用,在传染病暴发期间,还没有疫苗或治疗方法。在审查非洲各地的现行做法时,我们区分了社区参与临床研究的三个不同角色,这三个角色经常被混为一谈:1)社区参与对识别和尊重文化敏感性的重要性;2) 认识到提出研究的社会政治背景的重要性;以及3)根据自己的观点和价值观,了解什么符合被招募进行研究的社区的利益的重要性。通过做出这些区别,我们表明,当前的临床研究实践可以借鉴人类学的方式,有时不需要征求当地的文化价值观,忽视社会政治背景和更广泛的社会结构的重要性,这可能有助于加强不公正的政治或社会制度,并有可能使人们对这项研究的可信度产生怀疑。我们认为,迫切需要更敏锐的人类学参与,以及与其他社会科学家和人文学科工作者的更广泛合作,以改善非洲当前生物医学和药物研究实践的伦理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An ethics of anthropology-informed community engagement with COVID-19 clinical trials in Africa

The COVID-19 pandemic has reinforced the critical role of ethics and community engagement in designing and conducting clinical research during infectious disease outbreaks where no vaccine or treatment already exists. In reviewing current practices across Africa, we distinguish between three distinct roles for community engagement in clinical research that are often conflated: 1) the importance of community engagement for identifying and honouring cultural sensitivities; 2) the importance of recognising the socio-political context in which the research is proposed; and 3) the importance of understanding what is in the interest of communities recruited to research according to their own views and values. By making these distinctions, we show that current practice of clinical research could draw on anthropology in ways which are sometimes unnecessary to solicit local cultural values, overlook the importance of socio-political contexts and wider societal structures within which it works, potentially serving to reinforce unjust political or social regimes, and threaten to cast doubt on the trustworthiness of the research. We argue that more discerning anthropological engagement as well as wider collaboration with other social scientists and those working in the humanities is urgently needed to improve the ethics of current biomedical and pharmaceutical research practice in Africa.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Developing World Bioethics
Developing World Bioethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Developing World Bioethics provides long needed case studies, teaching materials, news in brief, and legal backgrounds to bioethics scholars and students in developing and developed countries alike. This companion journal to Bioethics also features high-quality peer reviewed original articles. It is edited by well-known bioethicists who are working in developing countries, yet it will also be open to contributions and commentary from developed countries'' authors. Developing World Bioethics is the only journal in the field dedicated exclusively to developing countries'' bioethics issues. The journal is an essential resource for all those concerned about bioethical issues in the developing world. Members of Ethics Committees in developing countries will highly value a special section dedicated to their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信